As you know, the Premier loves surprises.

I often heard Stanley Kubrick’s name when I spoke with friends who are film buffs. I had read ‘A Clockwork Orange’ in high school, and then learned that there was an acclaimed film adaptation directed by Kubrick, although I never got to watch it. Then, during my Freshman year at Cornell, I watched ‘2001: A Space Odyssey’ at the Cornell Cinema, which I again learned was directed by Kubrick. After finishing the film, I was curious how he went from directing that to directing something like ‘A Clockwork Orange’. In my mind, they must be immensely different styles (again, I haven’t watched the latter, but I can imagine what it must be like from the book). This was just a thought, and I didn’t think to really research (Google) any further about Kubrick. And then this past Friday, lo and behold, I learned of another stylistically distinct film by Kubrick, ‘Dr. Strangelove’. If I had looked into this Kubrick at all, I probably wouldn’t have been surprised, but I think it was an interesting experience to one-by-one discover these films. I like to imagine that I am reliving what people might’ve experienced back when these movies were being released (although, maybe not in chronological order).

Anyhow, the movie is great.

Dr. Strangelove: a Cold War What-If

If the United States accidentally launched nuclear strikes against the Russians, what would happen? That’s the question that Dr. Strangelove tries to answer, in the most dark-humorous way possible. As with all movies, I try to find a meaning or message behind what I am watching. While it seems silly and comical, Dr. Strangelove satirically depicts sentiments felt in the United States during the 20th century.

How did I feel about it? It was certainly funny, from the British fellow to the president to Dr. Strangelove (all played by the same actor by the way!). The crazy airbase general and the Texan air captain were equally as superb. I believe you can classify this movie as comically absurdist, a satire about fears of nuclear disruption.

Personally, I found it pretty cathartic. It’s as if all of humanity’s mistakes had culminated into this one point in time where the entire world is decimated. All of the doomsday fiction had come true and everyone went back to the stone age. Take a look at the abnormally long title of the movie itself: Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb. What does it mean to love the bomb? At some point, if the world comes to an end, perhaps we’d also end up thinking of the optimal male-to-female ratio in underground colonies during a nuclear winter.

Wild Hunt

The film Neruda follows Pablo Neruda, a pen name used by the Chilean politician Ricardo Eliécer Neftalí Reyes Basoalto. Neruda is forced underground when the political tide shifts, and the film follows Neruda and Oscar Peluchonneau, the young and perseverant police inspector who is assigned to capture the former. However, Neruda is not content to simply hide from the authorities (and he states that he “will not hide under a bed”); he makes appearances at public venues and leaves evidence of his movements for Peluchonneau to find. Neruda views the situation as a chance to increase fame, increasing his stature as an icon.

I found Neruda to be an interesting and complex character. His charisma and poetry speaks to many people. The word “cult of personality” comes to mind, indeed Neruda’s followers look upon him as a legend. However, he is also a flawed character. There are several scenes in which Neruda engages in…well, Neruda’s former wife and current partner both note that he is fond of women. He drinks a lot, can be short with . Yet this also contrasts with some of his other actions; for example, when he goes out walking and does not have anything for a child on the street, he hugs the child and gives the child his jacket. The complex portrayal made Neruda an interesting, though perhaps not an entirely sympathetic, character.

I did find certain parts confusing. In some scenes, characters would be in one place, and though they’re conversation was still ongoing, they were suddenly in a different setting. There were parts (though without spoiling too much), particularly at the end of the film that were confusing as well. Overall, I enjoyed the film and would recommend watching it.

Pre-(Country of Choice)

To be quite honest, I’ve never been interested in art history. But on Thursday evening, I found learning about art is far more interesting and deep than I imagined. Art is not just history of the piece. It’s also history of the culture. For example, we learned about a lot of ancient culture. (I call it Pre- culture since everything was labeled like that for identification.) In Pre-Columbian culture, vessels were very popular and even in different time periods and cultures you can tell the strong similarities and added traditions.

One interesting cultural fact I learned is about the Pre-Columbian culture. They had to special animals: birds and cats. These animals were thought to be able to transcend. Birds can fly up into the sky and cats can climb trees all the way up. As an avid lover of cats, it caught my attention immediately.

When we started working with the clay, I immediately decided to create a teapot. It was definitely a far bigger challenge than I imagined. But also so much fun. Unfortunately it is not food safe so will not be a functional teapot but a cute one nonetheless! Thanks so much for the workshop. Definitely one of the best events I’ve attended.

A feel-good movie

Last Thursday, I attended the screening and discussion panel of Hidden Figures at Cornell Cinema. For me, it was an enjoyable feel-good movie about three women who demonstrated their exceptional worth and helped pave the path for others. The movie was based on the stories of Katherine Johnson, Mary Jackson, and Dorothy Vaughan, though I would say that they didn’t feature them equally, with the story of Katherine Johnson having had more focus than the others. Katherine Johnson was portrayed as a prodigious mathematician who had the best numerical sense at NASA, while Mary Jackson was played as a fun-loving character who wanted to go to high school extension classes to become an engineer, and Dorothy Vaughan was a natural leader of the West Computing Group who learned and taught FORTRAN.

The movie itself was funny, but as a student in STEM, I would have appreciated more STEM related jokes because that’s a pretty significant part of these women’s journeys. It was pretty obvious at what points the dialogue was really dumbed down to be more digestible, but I guess I was expecting it to be nerdier. The movie, however, did have its fair share of the black experience in southern Virginia in the 60s. I’m still not clear about the history behind it, but it was strange that the movie showed this group of “colored computers,” but no black men working at NASA.

The staring and the awkwardness still present at the time definitely provided the audience insight to the attitude these women faced in their daily lives. There was one scene with a colored and white water fountains, and I can’t help but think about the other people of color, especially Asians and Hispanics, and their experiences at the time. During most of the movie, I was kind of annoyed with the fact that Katherine Johnson’s story included a love interest, but since that thread was based in fact, which we learned at the end of the movie, I tried to forgive it.

After the film, Professor Kim Weeden led a discussion about women in computer science and the film. What I did not realize was the large disparity in women in CS has been increasing rather than decreasing. Many of the CS students I personally interface with at Cornell have been women, but my own experience as a women in engineering has perhaps made me more inclined to seek out other women in similar fields. Looking at last fall’s enrollment statistics, CS ’18 majors in engineering is about 28% female, which doesn’t seem very high, but is higher than the national average. While this can be attributed to many things including the culture of Silicon Valley, one thing that I know shapes many prospective students choice to not pursue CS is the lack of background going into college. People enter top CS programs with a few years of programming experience already under their belts and have a couple years of summer internships because they were encouraged at a much younger age to study CS. This makes entering the major much more intimidating for those with absolutely no coding experience. In my opinion, the gender disparity in CS is largely attributed to how younger children are exposed to the notion that for some reason, being a computer nerd is typically male and uncool, and that creating a positive experience earlier on for more people, especially girls, can help tighten the gap.

During the discussion, one person brought up their disappointment in the white saviorism of the film, to which I have a differing opinion on. African Americans have fought hard for their representation in Hollywood and the media, but have largely forgotten about other people of color to the extent that they complain about things that aren’t just added to reinforce the white narrative. The truth is, things don’t magically change because of minorities’ hard work. In real life, there kind of has to be someone in power that gives you the chance to succeed. Yes, white men helped put them in a position to succeed, but without their own hard work and intellect, they would not have. So while others complain about this representation of minority success, I find it hard to overlook the fact that there are still minority groups who have unproportional and trite stereotypical media representation while the movie was clearly the positive retelling of actual people’s lives. This was a feel-good movie for a general audience and I definitely had a good time watching it.

Who really is Neruda?

The film Neruda left me with a lot of questions. I thought it was difficult to make out the storyline and the characters did not make much sense to me. While eluding capture by the president of Chile, Neruda engages in a game of cat and mouse with a policeman hired to find him. I found some parts ridiculous because at one point he and the policeman are facing each other but the policeman still cannot find him. Some scenes where Neruda is in a brothel just seemed vulgar to me. He did not seem like he really did not want to be found. All the while, his lover and others who love his poetry are doing all the work trying to keep him safe.

Although I thought some parts did not make much sense, one particular scene raised a key question for me. A poor woman asks Neruda that when communism gets to Chile, will everyone be like him, a rich politician and poet, or her, forced to clean up after others? I thought that this was a very valid question to ask, considering how much Neruda loved to party and drink. The film attempted to portray him as someone who cared about the poor workers, but I was personally not convinced. He seemed to just enjoy how everyone adored and loved him.

At the end of the movie, I was also confused about whether the policeman was dead or not. At one point he was in the grave, then at one point he was at a motel! This film was odd and nonsensical at times. However, I think it raised an important question about the credibility of those who are loved by the people. Are they really what everyone thinks they are or is it just their creation of a persona that everyone loves?

Perfecting a Musical

I attended the Cornell Cinema screening of the well-known Oscar nominee, La La Land. This film was fantastic and followed the lives of two individuals, Mia (played by Emma Stone) and Sebastian (played by Ryan Gosling), who were trying to become a household name in show business. It examined the challenges these individuals faced in their personal and professional lives they faced together and separately. Though this film was fiction, it successfully portrayed many of the challenges normal, everyday individuals face in relationships and in their jobs, while trying to improve themselves. It did a great job of depicting real-life challenges, allow the audience the chance to connect with the on-screen personalities. Unfortunately, this film did not win the best picture Oscar, though Emma Stone, who played Mia, won best actress for this film. I feel that if you have not had a chance to view this wonderful film, that you definitely should watch it the first chance you get. Throughout the movie, it was interesting to see how the directors incorporated Stone and Gosling’s musical scenes, as they do not strike me as the type of actors that would play characters in a musical. Overall, they did a fantastic job.

Is It True?

Through the Rose Scholars Program, I was able to attend a very informative table talk on fake news. Fake news is the spreading of false information through common news outlets and broadcasting stations. Fake news is common in today’s society and became very apparent in this past presidential election; it is all around us. Sometimes fake news is extremely apparent and other times it is hard to decipher and can spread quickly through social media sources such as Twitter and Facebook. In order to avoid reading and spreading fake news, follow the following steps: consider the is the article reliable, read more about the information discussed in the article, pay attention to the text itself (look for satire and ridiculous comments), is the author reliable, is the support for the news claim legitimate or fake, check the date of the article, and last but not least, double-check your own bias and make sure it is not overly-influencing you. Outlined above is a list of steps that can help individuals avoid believing fake news. Though time consuming, it is better to be informed about what is truly going on in the world. As fake news can potentially harm individuals and miss-inform the general public.

Identity Through Competition

The Rose Cafe that I attended last Wednesday was quite different from the rest than i attended before. This cafe was more akin to an open discussion with Professor Hill about the history as well as the future of Flora Rose House and the west campus system in general. Professor Hills most pressing concern, one I share with him as well, is the lack of identity of the different west campus houses. Judging from the types and frequency of events held at Rose House, I personally think that Rose House is the more academic house focused on intellectual development while a house like Bethe focuses more on developing its social aspect through fun events like smoothie making and frequent trips to see broadway show in New York City. This is only a personal opinion and whether or not this identity should be further pursued is up to the house professors and staff at Rose House.

As a method of promoting house spirit, I believe that competition is necessary in order to give residents a reason to be proud to be part of a particular house. While intramural sports competition between houses was attempted before in the past, competition can perhaps be encouraged through less physical yet still enjoyable and enriching ways. Some suggestions include having a house food drive for donation to the needy to having board game competitions such as Chess and Go. Another way to encourage competition is by having students participate in community and service events throughout campus. Points can be awarded to the house based on how many residents contributed to each service event. A house cup can be awarded at the end of the year and additional benefits can be given to the winning house such as meal vouchers or free food. The west campus house system in Cornell is still very much a work in progress and I would like to see a much stronger sense of house identity be developed within the time that I reside on this part of campus.

Are You MAD Yet?

With all the tension surrounding the North Korean nuclear program, this Friday Film certainly was topical. The movie this week was Dr. Strangelove, the story of how the world comes to an end through sabotage, mistakes, miscommunication, and possibly from one too many unfunny jokes. It is important to realize that humor (apparently) was very different in the 1960s, so setting that aside we should look to the message that the filmmakers were trying to convey. A general sends out his nuclear bomber planes without consulting anyone else. This leads to the uncomfortable position in which the American president tries to work with  his generals, the Russians, and the eponymous Dr. Strangelove to save the world from an accidental nuclear war. The resulting comedy is based around the ridiculous nature with which everyone attempts to resolve the situation. The general who started the attack has a crazy obsession with “bodily fluids”, the other American generals think that maybe war isn’t a terrible idea, the Russian leader is drunk at a party, and Dr. Strangelove (a former Nazi scientist) seems a little too excited about the destruction of the world. It seems as though humanity is destined to destroy itself by its own incompetence.

So how realistic is this? Spectacularly realistic. There have been multiple examples of how people around the world treat nuclear weapons with little to no concern. It is scary to learn about the number of nukes which have rolled off ships or been accidentally been deployed. In 1958 the US Air Force lost a bomb off the coast of Georgia, they looked for it for years but still have never found it. In 1961 the Air Force did it again in North Carolina, accidentally dropping two nuclear bombs into a swamp. They found both, but one was so deep in the swamp they left it and just bought all the land around it. To this day there are soldiers guarding a bit of swamp so that no one can try and dig it up. During the Cuban missile crisis a Russian submarine mistakenly thought it was under attack so they armed their nuclear weapons. Nuclear war almost started because some Russians heard a weird noise. Then there was the time a US airmen dropped a wrench on an ICBM and almost blew-up most of Arkansas. Even today it was reported that at the North Korean nuclear test site satellites took photos of people playing volleyball. So rather than the image we have of war, grave faces contemplating the fate of the world, World War Three could start while our president eats “the best” chocolate cake and the North Koreans play volleyball.

So are we destined to destroy ourselves in some  morbid comedy? Probably not, despite all the accidents the fail-safes have proved effective. The truly insane thing about all this is that humanity has the capability to destroy itself. It is such a strange concept to kill everything imaginable, and governments really do seem to love.  This is exemplified in the character Dr. Strangelove, he takes a great interest in the idea of a world-wide nuclear war. So we must be responsible with our new power, but remember no to love it too much.

Rose Scholars Feedback

Dr. Hill’s explanation of the Rose Scholars program and the many comments by the scholars during the café provided a great deal of food for thought concerning the future of Rose House. I thought I’d use my blog post to give my own feedback on the Scholars program, since I was a bit quiet during the café itself.

  1. Social Events: I think more events designed with the purpose of encouraging socialization between Rose residents would create a more cohesive community and identity for the Rose system. I have actually never held a conversation with another Rose Scholar at a Rose Scholar event. This might be a result of the types of events I have participated in (films, Rose Cafés, and lectures), and maybe some of the Saturday excursions have more socialization, but I would appreciate some events expressly created for that purpose.
  2. Food Events: Food-focused events, like cookie decorating or dumpling making would make for great social events, and it is still possible to make these activities more “scholarly” by teaching the scholars about the culture or science behind the food.
  3. Plant-Based Food: As another scholar mentioned during the café, if there are food-based events next semester, it would be great if there were vegan options as well. It’s pretty frustrating that even at the cafés, there are no vegan snacks or non-dairy milk/creamer.
  4. Films: During the first semester, I was pretty frustrated with the selection of movies we could see with the Rose Scholars at the cinema, since the events were almost always for documentaries. All films, not just documentaries, have intellectual and artistic value. I’ve appreciated that this semester there has been a lot more variety in the cinema films available for scholars. However, I am a still quite confused by many of the choices. For example, this week, the Cornell Cinema is showing both Pulp Fiction, an extremely popular movie among college students, and Daughters of the Dust, a influential film that would likely stimulate discussions about race and gender, but the Scholar event is Pablo Lorraine’s Neruda. As a biopic, Neruda does have educational value, but it strikes me as likely to be the least popular of the three among scholars.
  5. Scholarly Event Topics: While the café speakers have all been very interesting, I have found the range of topics to be rather narrow. Most of the speakers have spoken about either food or politics. With this semester’s smaller café format and encouragement of scholar participation, I often feel that I have little to contribute in discussions because my studies have not been in these fields. I would appreciate if we had speakers from a wider range of academic backgrounds. I’m an engineer, so I would actually really like to have some engineers/engineering professors come in.
  6. Rose House Identity: I understand that one of the goals of the Scholars program is to cultivate a unique Rose House identity. However, I don’t really understand what type of culture we are trying to create. Is Rose House supposed to be the intellectual house? The pre-professional house? I think the house that is closest to having a unique culture is Cook. Cook is seen as the “international” house because of (1) the language house (2) multi-cultural house events (3) those flags in the dining hall. I think if Rose wants to establish its own culture it should learn from Cook and host events that promote that culture. Or add something quirky to the dining hall decor.
  7. Regular Input: Finally, I agree with other scholars’ suggestions for monthly/weekly input on the events that will be offered. I always see posters for interesting events around campus and would appreciate if there were an easy way to communicate my interest to those who organize the events.

Overall, I have thoroughly enjoyed being a Rose Scholar for these past two semesters. The program has given me a great incentive to attend lectures and see films when I otherwise wouldn’t have, and guaranteed housing is a blessing in Ithaca.

Dr. Strangelove-Cheering for the End of the World

I was fully prepared not like Dr. Strangelove. I am not usually a fan of movies which are, for lack of a better term, weird. Last semester, one my classes showed us the clip of Dr. Strangelove’s alien hand choking him. I don’t recall how this tied in to what we were learning, but I do remember thinking to myself that this was not a movie I needed to see more of. I should not have judged a book by its cover, so to speak.

Dr. Strangelove is an undeniably funny movie. But, some of the films funniest moments are also some of the most unsettling. The film works so well because it gets us, as viewers, to feel both amused and disturbed simultaneously.

My favorite scenes were those involving the B52 bomber crew. If you had to choose who in Dr. Strangelove is the “protagonist”-the one whose story we as the audience are following, the one who strives-I would say it is the bomber crew, more so than the cast in the war room or at the base. To me, the protagonist is the character with whom the audience is asked to identify. The President and his generals are played as jerks and fools-you wouldn’t see yourself as one of them. I suppose Lionel Mandrake’s actions are the most hero-like, but he spends most of the story locked up with a crazy general, and bogged down in a lot of awkward references to said general’s “essence”. He’s played more as pitiable. In any other film, the B52 bomber crew would be the ones you root for, hands down. Their story line-scrappy American underdogs defeat long odds-is a mainstay of American cinema. We come into the film hardwired, so to speak, to like these characters. We feel sympathy for them-when a missile almost destroyed the plane, I, at least, crossed my fingers for it to miss-even though we know the success of their mission will bring about the end of the world.

Kubrick is making a point about the stupidity of American nationalism, and he does it very well. Perhaps the most effective moment in the whole film comes when general Turgidson explains to the President that, even with the entire Russian air force looking for them, there is still a chance the bomber will slip through.  He’s holding his arms out like a plane, proudly bragging about the superiority of the American bomber crew. Then, his face falls, when he realizes that if the plane does get through, the result will be the end of the world.

In the doctrine of MAD, Americans essentially believed that the way to keep ourselves safe was to keep building deadlier and deadlier weapons, to believe in and to maintain our military superiority to Russia. Kubrick suggests that what we were really doing was rushing headlong into oblivion, with Russia right behind us.

Ultimately, the mark of a good film is whether you find something new every time you see it. The Dr. Strangelove Wikipedia page says that the last scenes from the film are the explosions from the Russian doomsday device. I guess I must have misinterpreted the last few lines of dialogue-I thought it was America bombing Russia, trying to avoid the “mineshaft gap” by obliterating Russia, so that we could inherit the world, once the radiation subsided and humanity could emerge again. Which would have been perfect, considering America spends the rest of the film trying desperately to not bomb Russia. But, knowing that’s not how it really ends, I guess it will feel like a whole new film the next time I watch it.

Hidden Figures, not Forgotten Figures

When I went to see the film Hidden Figures, I expected it to be good because of the amount of film awards it won recently. It exceeded my expectation by far. I thought it was not only inspiring, but an encouragement to women in science today. I also felt that it was a reminder from the past about how far America has come as a nation.

The discussion after the movie that was facilitated by Professor Kim Weeden was also very eye-opening about the state of women in science today. It was shocking and surprising that there has been a decline in numbers of women in STEM paths. I think that the U.S. needs to focus on education overall to boost numbers. For the last couple years, attention has been giving to the fact that the U.S. educational system is not as good as other developed countries’ education systems.

I think that this film also drew attention to the importance of remembering people who have accomplished amazing things but are often overlooked. Ordinary people can be heroes in extraordinary circumstances. I think the character Catherine also demonstrated the importance of succeeding where everyone wants you to fail. Although everyone expected her to be unable to handle the pressure, she tried her hardest to prove them wrong. I thought her insistence to be present in the briefing room encourages women today to fight for places and positions they deserve.

Reflecting on the Rose Scholar’s Program

First of all, I’d like to say that I really appreciate the faculty’s desire for feedback on the Rose Scholar’s Program. It’s refreshing to feel like students’ opinions and wishes about a Cornell program are not only heard, but are a necessary building block for success.

I agreed with most things that were said at the forum, but I identified most strongly with the goal of creating some sort of a unique culture for each dorm on West Campus. This definitely existed freshmen year on North campus. The first question you would ask another freshman would be which dorm they lived in, and each dorm had different stereotypes about it. Unfortunately, most of the stereotypes were about the quality of the buildings, but not all. Now that I wonder why this existed for North campus but not West, I think the answer is that freshmen are more likely to latch onto any semblance of a family. They latch onto any perception of a feeling that they belong somewhere. Whereas sophomores already have a friend group, a “Cornell family”, and are less willing to identify with new places and things.

I’m not sure what the answer to this problem would be, because I know that there’s no way freshmen would be allowed to come directly to West campus, nor is there a way to somehow say (for example) that Clara Dickson is the sister dorm of Rose house. But I don’t think that the problem is unsurmountable. I think the solution has to be tied to a diversification of the dorms on West campus. If there were more discernible differences between the houses, then people would start to filter themselves into the house that aligns most strongly with their sense of identity. How to achieve this diversification is another matter altogether…and any strategy would need mass public and administrative support to succeed. So, theoretically, the first step is gaging support on campus for this idea. Then, maybe we can work to achieve it.

Dr. Strangelove–More Like Just Strange

I went to the showing of Dr. Strangelove completely unaware of the movie’s plot or style. All I knew was that it was widely regarded as one of the best comedies/ general movies of all time. Maybe these characterizations raised my expectations too high, but even had I gone into the movie expecting nothing, I think I still would have been disappointed.

I found the actual viewing experience tiresome and any comedic relief meager at best. While I really enjoyed the message of the film, I just couldn’t stand the way in which it was presented. It’s possible that I just didn’t prepare myself properly for a “comedy” from the 1960’s, or maybe I just don’t find the idea of nuclear war funny. But I do think that at the time the movie was made, it would have provided some much-needed levity to the incredibly tense atmosphere surrounding the Cold War.

Putting aside the actual movie,  I found the idea that one mad general could destroy the world intriguing, if not a bit scary. In the movie, the different bureaucratic levels of the military caused myriad problems, and I don’t think that things have become much simpler now. Our entire system falls apart when someone just decides not to follow orders, and it’s frightening to think that so much trust is placed in faulty human beings who could decide to rebel at any time. All in all, I’m glad I went to the movie because it presented interesting topics, even if I disliked the way in which they were presented.

Hidden Figures

I greatly enjoyed last week’s screening of Hidden Figures. I think few movies can really stir up real emotion within us, and I noticed that several other students in the theater were also moved to tears.

After reading through some of peers’ responses, I was drawn to that by Ilse in particular. I think she made several good points about how the film adopted some elements of white saviorism, by incorporating fictional white characters who assist the main three Black heroines on their way. That said, I think there are good reasons to disagree with this interpretation too.

From what I saw, a number of hostilities were clearly directed by characters such as Harrison, Mitchell, and Stafford towards Goble, Vaughan, and Jackson, ranging from passive aggression, condescension, and insensitivity. This is not even to mention the outright racism inflicted by some of the supporting or minor white characters on them. The film’s message is one of reconciliation, one that ends with the “hidden figures” largely at peace with these white leads, who eventually come to admire and respect them for their hard work. I don’t necessarily think that’s a bad signal to send, especially in times of racial strife. I think it would have been worse for the film to portray every white character as a one-dimensional racist.

That said, I do think the film might unwillingly promote the idea that “hard work” can get anyone ahead, and that outside intervention might not be necessary at all. It promotes the American ideal of individualism, yes, but it relegates the civil rights movement and its social organization to the background. But then again, you can’t fit everything in one film.

Truth in Absurdity

Walking out of the viewing of Dr. Stangelove last week, the crowd was stunned. The film is incredibly unique, it’s dark, funny, and surreal. I had never seen it before, but this entire week my suitemates and I have been quoting it non-stop. In fact, I think it’s one of my favorite movies. It’s very rare that a movie sticks with you or affects you in the same way Dr. Strangelove has done for me. The beauty of the movie is that its seemingly absurdist story of the world being destroyed is actually not absurdist at all. In fact, nuclear nuclear weapons have been prepped to launch on account of misunderstandings more than once. That is absolutely insane to me, and Dr. Stangelove does a wonderful job of showing how something so normal to us (nuclear weapon stockpiles) is absolutely ludicrous.

After seeing this movie, I’ve spent much of this past week thinking about nuclear weapons, and about the end of humanity in general. I listened to a podcast on how a member of the air force was fired simply because he asked if there was a check and balance on the president, who would order a nuclear strike. I also read about how a member of the Manhattan Project had designed a nuclear weapon with the strength to spew enough dirt into the atmosphere to cause an ice age, similar to the level of power of the Doomsday device in Dr. Strangelove. He proposed this weapon to the military in the 1950’s but it was rejected because the military saw no use in a literal apocalyptic tool. It’s difficult to put into words how this makes me feel, it’s a mixture of amusement, incredulity, and melancholy. Dr. Stangelove is great because it portrays all these feelings in a way that I fail to do. It shows how silly and scary humanity can be.

Thoughts on Rose House Events

The Rose Cafés are a key way to bring community on West together; however, I do feel that they are somewhat exclusive to Rose house members alone, which really limits our ability to engage with students from other houses. While I am a strong proponent for continuing Rose House events that draw from a pool of Rose residents, I would encourage planning an event once or twice in the semester that would include inter-residency mixing.

On another note, I would like either more Rose café events to be offered throughout the week or other events with that amount of time commitment. I usually find the café events most manageable. However, this semester was a struggle for me because I was able to attend café events only when my night class canceled (only three). The solution to this was to make as many of the Friday night film screenings as possible, which although I think are very convenient and which I really enjoy (given that I am a cinephile), I found to be quite exhausting having to balance them with my Cinematography and Screenwriting courses, which require me to attend a certain number of film screenings at the Cornell Cinema per semester. I think this amount of watching films becomes quite overwhelming, and I would encourage for the Rose house events to allow students in these situations to substitute (once or twice) the house requirement with fulfilling a course requirement especially when it seems to overlap to such an extent. In regards to the Friday film screenings, I also think they take away from attending screenings at the Cornell Cinema or even the live performance ones at Sage Chapel, which I find to be an incredibly important cinematic experience that should be encouraged above one in a dining hall room where the color calibration from projector to screen and the sound quality is not as immersive as in a dark theater space.

As a double major and a scholar, I am also committed to attending many extracurricular events (receptions and lectures–all of which I find to be immensely exciting and valuable), which often conflict with the Rose house events (ones that are oftentimes study breaks and bonding). I would suggest that perhaps going forward, the Rose house events can include more student input in the types of events that are held.

Dr. Strangelove, A Satiric Masterpiece

Of all the films present in Stanley Kubrick’s vast cinematic reservoir, Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb (1964) is perhaps the masterpiece of satiric cinematic technique, and is demonstrative of Kubrick’s chameleon-like directorial abilities. The film satirizes with charm and grace, granting laughs and chuckles even to a young audience watching it 50 years after its creation. However, its masterful satiric ability is how its laughs are simultaneously terrifying in nature. In the scene where Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake (Peter Sellers) desperately attempts to phone the President of the United States from a phone booth, we laugh as he is being stalled by being short a few coins. Yet, at the same time, we are haunted by the idea that the very system we abide by is halting the savior of humanity, for a mere 20 cents. This adds to the terrifying idea that the current political system of the world is so dangerously unbalanced that not only is the destruction of the world due to one man’s choice, but that its savior is a relatively random person begging for change at a phone booth. It gives a sense of powerlessness through this demonstration, as the top political and military officials of the world essentially helplessly watch and pray that a miracle allows them to stop world destruction. To add to this frustration for the audience, neither country with nuclear weapons even wants this to happen. In other words, even if the countries of the world somehow navigate a path to peace, there is still a chance that it could all blow up for essentially no reason.

More than anything else, this contrast between the comedic and the horrific demonstrates Kubrick’s comedic mastery. No joke in the film is baseless humor designed to get a quick laugh before going back to the action of saving the world. Each comedic sketch, even if seemingly unrelated, delves deep into the problems associated with human psychology, patriarchal power (both social and political), mob mentality, and how it all puts the safety of the world in danger. Even the comedic one-liner that ends the phone booth scene demonstrates this. As Capt. Lionel Mandrake demands Col. ‘Bat’ Guano (Keenan Wynn) to shoot the lock of a Coca-Cola machine to get spare change for his phone call, Guano says, “But if you don’t get the President of the United States on that phone, you know what’s going to happen to you? You’re gonna have to answer to the Coca-Cola company.” Its comedy arises from the expectation of some physical threat being realized as a simple statement of fact. Yet, it is still unnerving, as the quote demonstrates the resistance to breaking the machine because it is private property, even though the world may be destroyed without doing so. It suddenly is more important to follow the law when it comes to a soda machine than saving the world from nuclear destruction.

The film for this reason has as much impact today as it did back when it was released, specifically because our society is still dealing with these same problems. Just as Kubrick seemed to demonstrate in his film, it seems humanity, and specifically men in power, haven’t changed much at all since the dawn of civilization.

The Long History of a Sports Game

There is nothing quite like the Transatlantic series as Paul Wilcox explained. The teams on various sides of the Atlantic traveled before there were even flights between the two continents.

I believe the magic of this exchange is not in the actual events, but in the history that is made between the various institutions. The universities chosen are interesting as they represent the top institutions found in both the US and the UK and gives me the impression that the Transatlantic series is very elitist. That caught me off guard during the talk, although Cornell is an Ivy League school, elitism doesn’t usually come to mind.

It was incredible to see Mr. Wilcox and Dr. Hill talk about the transatlantic series. I could tell that both men are very passionate about it and have put a lot of work into making the series successful. Overall, I think that this is good for the institutions involved and helps bridge barriers between institutions across the Atlantic. I hope the schools will find other areas to also collaborate on in the future.

Sports and Random Thoughts

Paul Wilcox engaged us in a discussion about the Transatlantic Series. Noting the transformative potential of sports, Wilcox noted that they bring people together. As an Honorary Secretary of the Achilles Club, he was able to offer some interesting perspectives about the different. We were able to see photos and videos of athletes at different times in history. As someone who loves to go into the archives to look at materials, this was an especially impactful thing for me to be able to see in the talk.

 I immediately thought of the ways in which sports can be a form of exchange and bring people together, but also how they can maintain barriers and reflect systems of power. I read “What is Intersectionality” in Intersectionality by Patricia Hill Collins and Sirma Bilge for one of my courses, and it illuminated how different power structures come into play on a field that is often portrayed as equal when the players are on it. However, behind the scenes, there are much larger power structures at play. For example, interpersonal interactions can play a huge factor in performance on the field. Bilge and Collins give the example of a Nigerian player on a professional soccer team who was subject to racial epithets from both fans and teammates. These mechanism are a part of a broader system of economic, social, and political marginalization. At times, we forget that these structures creep into our forms of entertainment that are seemingly “fair” and meritocratic. However, they are important and play a large factor in outcomes on an interpersonal and broader level.

Ivy League goes England

Cornell has a lot of unique features in its athletic program because of its membership in the Ivy League. The Transatlantic series is one of those features. Even though I am a big sports fan, I had never heard of this track and field event. Throughout the presentation i recognized a few of the names like Roger Bannister and I read about the Penn Relays in high school, but it was interesting to learn about how the Ivy League competes against Oxford and Cambridge. One interesting tidbit that Mr. Willcox conveyed to us was that for the English teams when they travel to the U.S., they spend about 15 days moving throughout the different campuses and then to New York City and that the dates in which the competition takes place, usually coincides with the English examination period. He also said that in between events, some students will often be seen study for their upcoming exams. This reminded me of the cafe from earlier in the year when the Cornell tennis coach told us a story about how one of his athletes had to drive to and from a tournament while also attending all of his classes. A common perception is that university athletes have it easy and dont have to try as hard in school. These individuals discussed put this perception to shame. One of the themes of the talk was to look at life in a different way and after hearing Mr. Willcox describe the schedules that these athletes have and the performance that they have to obtain both on and off the track is truly astonishing.

A Hidden Figures Curriculum

Last Thursday, I attended the screening of Hidden Figures, followed by a discussion with Professor Kim Weeden. Although I knew the gist of the story, I refrained from reading about it online because I wanted to watch the movie before reading a synopsis/review. Post-movie, I was curious about the the real people behind them.I read more about all three women: Katherine Johnson, Dorothy Vaughan and Mary Jackson. In addition, I read about the movie itself.

Although Hidden Figures did not win any Oscars, it has gotten recognition greater than a couple of awards. For one, Hidden Figures was the highest-grossing Best Picture Nominee.Additionally, Twentieth Century Fox, in partnership with Journeys in Film (a non-profit) and the USC Rossier School of Education, plans to design a free syllabus (Which includes complementary copies of the movie) with eight lessons based on the film. The curriculum is said to include lessons on the context surrounding the film: segregation, the Cold War and the Civil Rights Movement. Although movies are often played in classes, this is one of the first times that I have heard of a film studio commissioning a curriculum based on a movie.

On further thought, it seemed like a really good idea. When I first watched the movie, I was engrossed in the narrative. Internally, I cheered on at every win for the three women and was annoyed at the fictional characters that embodied various racial and sexist prejudices. I was so invested in the plot and the subsequent happy ending that my curiosity, after the movie, extended only to the three women, and I did not think much further about the context of the story.

I feel like the curriculum is a good way to encourage greater analysis. It stops the audience (At least the students that might take lessons in this curriculum) from disengaging with the narrative after the movie is over. It also provokes reflection on aspects of the movie other than the plot, like subtext and so on.

The Transatlantic Series

Last Wednesday, Paul Willcox, president of the Transatlantic Organization came to gave a talk about the track and field legacy that exists among the Ivy League universities, Cambridge University, and Oxford University. And having a passion for sports, I think it was a great talk overall. I remember used to having watched documentaries about my favorite players in basketball and the feats they achieved, and much of my enjoyment was reflected in Mr. Willcox’s presentation about the history and the players that dominated the game. But beyond the joys of hosting the games, Mr. Willcox denoted the taxing schedules their athletes have at hand. Right after the games, these students have to go back to London to take their exams and this talk has made me more appreciative of the effort that athletes put into their work. Not only do they have to balance training and competing, but they also have to balance their studies. After all, they are students just like us.

Though I really wished we could have talked to some of the students that attended Cambridge or Oxford. I personally have seen them in the dining halls, but have not had the opportunity to talk to them. I think it would have been a great way to learn more about other cultures and what life is like in London! A fellow Rose Scholar did also bring this up and I’m glad that plans may potentially be made in the coming years for us to mingle with the athletes.

But beyond the sports gatherings, I also learned about subtle cultural details that separate the US and the UK. For instance, Assistant Dean Hill told us that it was frowned upon when universities asked alumni to donate money as means of showing gratitude. Here, in the US, on the other hand, school organizations frequently send out mail asking for alumni to give back for future development of the school. In fact, even my middle school and high school send e-mails once in a while telling me to participate in alumni affairs, one of which is to give back to the community. All in all, Mr. Willcox gave an insightful talk about track and field development over the years while keeping things engaging.

Improving the Rose House Experience

Tonight’s cafe was different from previous cafes that I have attended in that it was primarily a brainstorming session. We discussed ways to improve the Rose Scholars program and the West Campus Living and Learning system. 

One point that I brought up during the discussion was the idea of rotating events through fixed time slots instead of having the same events at the same time every week. This semester, I have only been able to attend Rose Cafes for the most part because the other times do not fit with my schedule. However, when the “What’s Happening in Rose” email goes out, I often find that the seminar series events and table talks sound very interesting, but they happen at times that I cannot make. I think it would make sense to have events at the same time every week so that people can plan out their schedules ahead of time, but it would be nice to change the events that happen during those times. For example, some weeks we could have a seminar series event or a table talk on Wednesday night instead of a cafe.

I feel like the two main areas for improvement in the Rose Scholars Program are getting more people to come to events who are not Rose Scholars and promoting bonding among residents, especially at the beginning of the year when people are new to the house and still have free time. The first is a challenge because students are busy and will only go to an event if they know that it will be worth their time. I think that events that have clear applications to academic and/or professional success may be popular among people who are not Rose Scholars (the seminar series is a good start). As for bonding events, I think that events with food or a fun activity would be popular. Some ideas are going to one of the free concerts in the commons which run through mid September, having a barbecue at one of the state parks (preferably before the swimming closes for the season), and having an ice skating event after we return from winter break (which has been done in past years).

Creating Community

As I reach the close of my second year in the Rose Scholars program, I found tonight’s Rose café a great opportunity to reflect on the changes I have seen in the program and the ways it could develop in the future. I liked the fact that Dr. Hill opened our discussion with a brief history of the program so that we could see how recent changes fit into the program’s overall history. For instance, I was surprised to learn that the Rose café had only begun to be held in the library room last year and that moving it into the House Professor’s apartment was a return to its original setup. Personally, I have really appreciated this change in location because I like the more intimate atmosphere and because I feel that the restrictions on the café’s size have led to a noticeable increase in attendance at non-café events in the past semester.

After we discussed specifics of the Rose Scholar program, the conversation expanded to cover the overall problems with establishing permanent house cultures on West given the huge student turnover each year. This issue resonated with me since, although I am a rising senior who will be living at Rose for my third year, I would struggle to define what makes life at Rose different from any of the other houses on West. I thought many people tonight made insightful suggestions on ways in which these distinct cultures could be established, such as having inter-house competitions or having each house “adopt” a freshman dorm on North to provide a continuity between freshman and sophomore years. Dr. Hill explained, however, that the current general lottery system and the housing shortage make it impossible for freshmen to self-select houses, so any real solution to this issue will have to involve major changes to the existing system.

Logistics of Rose

At this week’s rose cafe we spoke with Doctor Hill and discussed the logistics of Rose House living, and what could be done to create a more distinct identity among houses. One of the people in the cafe brought up a point that because selection into these houses is largely based on convenience rather than a common interest, this is largely impossible to facilitate. The common interest at the moment, at least among rose scholars, is simply the desire for a bed on campus for next year. Furthermore, I feel that as sophomores at Cornell, we have already established who our close friends throughout college will likely continue to be, and trying to force friendships will be counter intuitive.

I find it really funny that trying to make people more proud to be in the housing group that we live in through physical competition was unsuccessful. Personally, I think that this again has to do with the fact that people only live here for convenience. Further, because Cornell is so academically oriented, people spend their free time mostly studying. I personally would not be that interested in a competition like that, as I am busy doing homework, and I cannot imagine that I am alone.

Another thing that we talked about was having more consistent events. I would really love this. At the moment, I can only make the rose cafe, however it is extremely stressful as most of my assignments are due on Thursday morning. Therefore, I have to go to Rose Cafe, write up a blog post, and then stress as I have lost some time to do a problem set due the next day. Therefore, more consistent events throughout the week would really improve future scholars’ experience.

Sports at Ivy Leagues

Last week we welcomed Paul Wilcox to the Rose Cafe. Being a bit of a video game nerd who was forced into sports earlier in my life, I am personally not very interested in sports, so I was not expecting the talk to solicit much interest from me. I personally could not really care less about the dynamics of a team sport, and ones training regime. However, I was very excited to learn not only that that his presentation was about track and field (the only sport that I have ever participated in since I am uncoordinated), but the presentation also didn’t really focus so much on the sports itself, but more the history and culture exchanged from these sports, and how participating in these sports affected the athlete’s lives.

I ran cross country in high school, however I was only good enough to be the slowest person on my high school’s team to make it into the state competitions. Therefore, hearing about the cultural exchange going on between the athlete’s competing at a collegiate level really drove home how different sports are from a high school perspective and a college perspective. As a high school student, participating in a school sport just meant going to practice and dying for 2 hours. However as a college athlete, so much of ones life at that level revolves around the sport, since being that good at a sport allows an athlete to get more opportunities than they otherwise would be able to get.

When he was talking about the effect that the sport itself has on athletes, I was reminded of the athletes from England in the United States at Cornell last week. He had mentioned that the athletes need to prepare for finals as they begin right after they return. I cannot imagine the stress of having to prepare for finals while also being abroad for a sports meet. I wonder what they will get out of their time in the US other than stress. Personally, if I were in these athlete’s circumstance, I would be too stressed to sleep.

Andre Simores and Brazil

I found Andre Simores’ talk very interesting. He talked about many facets of Brazil and its education system and gave me a good view of the country.

As a professor there, he provided an accurate description of the educational system found in Brazil. Compared to Brazil, American institutions of high education are much better funded and run. A large part of this was that many American Universities are private while most Brazilian counterparts are public.

The political institutions of Brazil are not as well developed as in the US with corruption plaguing many Brazilian politicians. This means that funding for higher education is not a priority for Brazil. Even in public universities in the US, fundraising is a huge priority with donors providing a significant portion of the money. Since Brazil doesn’t have this luxury, their institutions do not remain well funded.

Simores also focused on the economy in his talk. Brazil has a large agriculture industry like the US, but other parts of its economy are not as well developed. Countries like Brazil who are underdeveloped with rich resources really benefit from a well run and transparent government so their resources do not increase corruption and inequality. An example of this is Nigeria, since oil was discovered, the average Nigerian has actually gotten more poor since most of the profits from its natural resources have only gone to a small number of individuals.

For Brazil to have a better higher education system and more developed economy, the government needs to fundamentally change to become more democratic and more accountable.

A Different Way of Looking at Sports

My only connection with Track and Field is watching it as a spectator during the Olympic games. I enjoy watching the sprints-100m,200m because the athletes have such high energy and look like they are flying across the track in a matter of seconds. The endurance and strength of the athletes are reflected in the sport as they are forced to battle against some of the best and fastest athletes from around the world. Since track and field is not a team sport, each athlete is left on their own to reach the finish line before anyone else. I always found it fascinating that no matter where you are in the world, track and field is a common sport in every country. Paul Wilcox’s talk about the transatlantic series showed how track and field helped connect students from different colleges and countries in order to participate in a sport that they were all passionate about.

The historic rivalries between Oxford and Cambridge and Harvard and Yale are broken during the transatlantic games which encourage teamwork among different colleges who are participating to win together. Oxford are Cambridge are usually paired up along with Harvard and Yale and Cornell and Penn. The games allow either the American teams to travel to England or the English teams to come to America in order to participate in the event. Both the English and the Americans face a culture shock while traveling to the other country; however, they bridge the culture gap through their mutual passion for track and field. The athletes not only get the opportunity to participate in one of the most prestigious events for track and field, but also get the opportunity to form long lasting friendships. Wilcox is still on the board of the transatlantic series committee and fondly reminisced about his track and field days. The series is more than just a competition among the best track and field athletes, it is a coming together of different minds and cultures and the positive relationships that grow out of these interactions.

New York City

Sam Beck’s talk taught really altered the way I thought about education. I realized that although I was interested in what I was studying at Cornell, I did not know what I was truly passionate in doing professionally.

And I think that that is something that is important to know, because it is easy to loose motivation if one if just taking classes aimlessly to fulfill graduation and major requirements. Thus I am interested in doing a semester in either New York City or Washington DC during my senior year.

It is fantastic that Cornell can offer these resources to students to let them take classes in these major cities. This change of environment will be good for me, but most importantly, it will allow me to discover what I am truly passionate in. I hope to find interesting internships in my relevant field and work them alongside my classes.

I had not thought seriously about these opportunities until after hearing Sam Beck’s talk. He seriously advocated on behalf of them and talked about the potential that they had to elevate the education of each student. For this I am grateful to him for coming.

Sports=unificaiton

This week I got to attend a seminar by Paul Wilcox.  Although I am not interested in sports, I was able to learn a lot about what sport actually does and how it has the power to connect multiple cultures and society.He talked about Transatlantic Series, which basically track meet between American and UK universities. He talked about how because of the experience, may athletes are able to experience and learn about multiple cultures. Wilcox talked about strangeness in finding love and passion in the same thing, even If the students are form different culture, country, and background. The long history of the Transatlantic series reminds the importance of cultural understanding, healthy competitive plays, and etc. The power to gather and learn is phenomenal and I am amazed by such a long standing tradition.

A Trip Overseas: Cultural Exchange and the Transatlantic Series

Last Wednesday, I listened to Paul Wilcox speak at the Rose Cafe on the Transatlantic Series. I went into the event questioning why I signed up to listen to a talk about a sporting event when I have zero interest in sports. I was pleasantly surprised that I could relate to the talk, for while it was about sports, it also was about cultural exchange. I find it fascinating to consider the fact that there were groups of American college students in the late 1800s, many of them from Cornell, who were getting on a boat and traveling across the Atlantic. Nowadays, this does not seem as big of a deal, since traveling to England only requires less than a day of flying by plane, but back then this was a major commitment. Traveling across the Atlantic took days, and there still was the return trip. This seems like it was a massive endeavor for a group of college students, just for a track and field meet. This idea of an international sporting event was quite new at the time–not even the Olympics had started yet–and it seems astonishing to me that such an event could be pulled off during this time. The fact that this tradition has been able to remain for so long–as well as the fact that there were those willing to put in the effort to have this event back in the time before airplanes–suggests that the chance to actually experience a different culture was worth the effort.

Collegiate Unity Across Oceans: The Transatlantic Series

Mr. Wilcox gave an interesting talk on Track and Field and the transatlantic competitive history that began before my time. Composed of top-tier universities primarily Ivy Leagues and Oxford and Cambridge, the Transatlantic Series is a American-British meet for Track and Field. I didn’t expect this going into the talk because the title of the actual event was attributed to something an athlete in that meet had once said. But his presentation thematically fit it: “Freedom to Look at Life in a Different Way.” I think it is remarkable that these athletes are able to dedicate at least a week of their time to travel across the ocean (traveling was more impressive in the past when boat was the form of transportation) and engage in a competition with their counterparts. Now while it was a fierce series, both sides of the Atlantic winning over the years with a constant shift in victories, Mr. Wilcox highlighted the more social aspect of the experience. After all, it is not often you get to meet foreigners for a continuous period, work hard and sweat alongside them and eat as well. Mr. Wilcox showed pictures of where the participants stayed during the Series and it was a very impressive vacation home. I think it is great that they are able to represent themselves in a sport they clearly love and also bond with others and get a different perspective on life. From what I can tell, the social aspect grew organically and soon became an integral part of the experience. I think it is something valuable, going back to the title of the talk, to not only do what you are given and instead extend beyond. You don’t need to just go there to compete and leave. Instead make friends, socialize and essentially make bonds that could possibly last for a long time. This philosophy could be applied to other parts of life as well.

It was a good talk because he did a fine job of detailing the history of Track and Field, particularly at a collegiate level, giving context. I was only aware of what events the sport involved but nothing totally in depth. The extra information was certainly helpful and interesting to learn. There also a section about the differing cultures and the cultural shock the athletes have when they come over so that was certainly illuminating. I think it is a good thing that this type of event is promoted and facilitated since it allows for collegiate unity across the ocean. I can tell this would quite the experience to go if one had the chance. I am curious if other sports or activities have similar programs in place. It is of course expensive to implement, and I liked learning about how Mr. Wilcox and his fellow colleagues work together to make this event happen, but if it can happen, I don’t think anybody would reject such an opportunity. What would you be interested in if you could get a transatlantic completion of sorts for it?

The Transatlantic Series is for NARPs too

Last Wednesday my fellow Rose Scholars and I were lucky enough to learn about an event that is close to Dr Hill, the Transatlantic Series. Paul Willcox, the president of the organization, gave us a presentation that displayed both the history and the importance of this event. It was emphasized how much the series can help broaden the track and field team’s world view while also strengthening their relationships and building ties with friends overseas. This even goes as far as affecting some of the travelers’ career paths, as Willcox mentioned one athlete who visited the US during the Great Depression and went on to become a global economist as a result.

I can only imagine the life changing experiences that these travelers have. I was fortunate enough to meet some of the captains before they had a dinner Thursday night. In the brief period I spent talking to them, I was able to learn a bit about the education differences in the UK, as well as their experiences in the US. I found it incredibly amusing hearing about what their take on Cornell was, specifically their take on drinking and American parties was great to hear.

I wish that I had been able to speak with them longer, as our conversations were cut short by their meal and my prelim. I was able to take so much out of 15 minutes talking to 3 of the athletes, I can only imagine what spending a few days with them would do. Hopefully, in the future Dr. Hill and Mr. Willcox will recognize that these travels are not only an opportunity for the athletes to broaden their world view, but they also pose opportunities for us NARPs (non-athletic regular people) to as well.

Dr. Strangelove: An Inaccurate Representation of MAD

This past Friday, I attended Rose’s screening of the dark political satire, Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb. Although labeled as one of the best comedies of all time, the film actually did more to scare me than it did to make me laugh. I think this was the movie’s underlying purpose, honestly. It was released in 1964, right in the midst of the Cold War, during which the strategy of MAD (mutual assured destruction) was in full thrust. If you don’t know what MAD is, it is a military theory supposing that the threat of nuclear attack against the enemy deters the enemy from using nuclear weapons. Critics have labeled the film as a satirization of MAD, persuading us of the shortcomings of the strategy. In the movie (spoiler alert!), the USSR has built a doomsday device, which threatens to destroy all human and animal life if activated by a detonation on USSR soil. The US, not having been alerted of this device’s existence, drops a bomb on the USSR, and the movie ends with explosions all across the globe, signaling the apocalypse and showing us the worst outcome of MAD.

Although I do generally agree that the presence of nuclear arsenals globally is terrifying, undesirable, and not ideal, I don’t think that the movie provides a fair and accurate representation of MAD. First of all, in reality, the former USSR would have announced the existence of their doomsday device to the world immediately. They would have wanted the US to know of this device so that the country would be deterred from attacking and ending mankind. The fact that the USSR delayed in doing so was unrealistic and did not represent proper MAD strategizing. Additionally, in the movie, the US has a network of underground shelters to protect against nuclear attack. In reality, these means of protection against nuclear attack do not follow MAD strategizing, as they make nuclear retaliation by the enemy less of a deterrent for nuclear aggression. Therefore, although this movie may seek to show why the Cold War policy of MAD is ineffective, it does not accurately represent how MAD works. Therefore, its hypothesized outcomes of such a theory are null. Nonetheless, the movie fairly encapsulates the worst fears of citizens living through the Cold War. Maybe it’s satirization of nuclear warfare allowed citizens to quell their anxieties and laugh a little. Comedy is the best cure, in the end.

 

The Transatlantic Series

This past Wednesday I attended the talk by Paul Willcox on the Transatlantic Series entitled “Freedom to Look at Life in a Different Way.” The Series is an international track and field event in which the Ivies, along with Oxford and Cambridge, take turns hosting track and field athletic competitions. This event involves the creation of joint teams, Cornell and Penn, Yale and Harvard, and Oxford and Cambridge.

In his talk, he explained the history of the Series starting in 1874. I found the history to be very interesting, but was more excited by the component of cultural exchange and community which exists within the event. The Transatlantic Series serves as an avenue for these athletes to be hosted by different universities both within their own countries as well as in another. The cultural differences experienced here are beneficial in that they simultaneously broaden the mind and expose these individuals to new communities. I find the travel is incredibly valuable in this aspect, but is even more enlightening when it involves the kind of immersive experience offered by the Series.

Additionally, I was interested in the way the Series promotes camaraderie between universities with stark rivalries. In they formation of joint teams, these universities learn to value the other’s particular culture and community. In this one, the athletes can expand their sense of community to include those outside of their own university.

Overall, I found Paul Willcox’s talk quite interesting. As someone who is not involved with sports, his talk provided me with a deeper understanding of the community formed within an athletic team. I came away wishing I was a part of the Series myself!

Universities Coming Together

Last Wednesday, I got to learn about track and field and the Transatlantic Series. What stood out to me from the talk was the aspect of bringing different schools together to enjoy a common interest. The different perspectives gained from this are very interesting. From my own experience with the Esports at Cornell club, having Overwatch teams from Cornell play against teams from other schools, even just over the internet, is really enjoyable. Not only does everyone improve from the experience, but even the little discussions between the players over the internet can be rather entertaining and interesting. In fact, considering the mutual benefits of bringing universities together for Esports and sports in general, we hope to have tournaments in person with other universities in the future!

The Transatlantic Series: Creating Peace

I went to a Rose Cafe where I learned about the Transatlantic Series, which is a track and field competition between members of the Ivy League and Oxford and Cambridge. I learned that the Series was the first “international” athletic competition that the US participated in. While looking through the pictures of the competition in the past, it occurred to me how cultural exchange between countries helps prevent conflict. If two cultures understand each other better, then they are less likely to fight with each other. Competitions like the Transatlantic Series and the Olympics create good will between countries, and they also give people an outlet to show national pride that isn’t war, for example, cheering on your team. In recent years there has been less conflict in the world than there has been previously, and I think that that is due to globalization. As people, food, ideas, and sports migrate between countries, people not only understand each other better, a global culture starts to appear. That’s why I think that international athletic competitions are good for world peace, and I’m really happy that I got to learn more about the first international competition that the US participated in

Transatlantic Series: Importance of Sports

One of the great things about attending the Rose Cafe is having the opportunity to learn about various topics that I would be unlikely to encounter otherwise. At the Rose Cafe with Paul Wilcox, the Honorary Secretary of the Achilles Club, we learned about the Transatlantic Series, which is a track and field competition pitting Ivy League schools in the United States against universities in the United Kingdom. It originated in 1894 (which predates the modern Olympics!), and in its current iteration, Penn and Cornell team up against Oxford and Cambridge, with the location of the event alternating between the universities.

As an avid sports fan, I personally feel that such events are truly awesome. When we think about college athletics and also professional athletics in today’s world, there typically is little interaction between sports teams in the United States and teams in other nations in numerous sports (ex: NBA, NFL, etc.); this is unfortunate since I have always believed that sports possesses a unique unifying power for human beings. Having such events as the Transatlantic Series can be crucial for breaking down barriers and experiencing cultures from all over the world. The fact that the event involves college students is especially neat, and it seems like a bit more exciting and shortened version of studying abroad!

Running Running Running

This past Wednesday, I learned more than I ever thought I could at the Rose Cafe. Paul Wilcox was the esteemed speaker. What drew me to his talk was his credentials. He graduated from Eton College and Corpus Cristi, Cambridge. It amazed me so much I had to hear whatever he had to say, regardless of the topic. Little did I know it’d be about track and field.

He discussed the history of track and field in Cambridge/Oxford and the Ivy Leagues. I did not know how much history and monumental moments in track and field were created by graduates of even my own school. In my mind, I think of Cornell as a great school in academics but never really athletics. But when he talked about how one track and field star and Cornellian broke world record! Thats incredible! Especially with his British accent, Paul Wilcox was able to capture the very full audience and entertain us the entire time (which is very rare for an hour long talk).

Although I can continue to talk about his great talk in track and field, I was actually very interested in the first 5 minutes of introduction more. Paul Wilcox is a shipbroker! I was so amazed at his profession, for it is rare to be in attendance of a talk from a non-academic. His career path as a ship valuer is just so interesting. Not only is he a busy man in career, but he spends his time dedicated to preserving the history and value of the track and field community. He truly is an amazing person and has had an amazing life path.

Thank you so much for talking to us! I definitely recommend to hear him speak if anyone is able to.

The Transatlantic Series: Everything I thought I’d Never Know About Track and Field

This past Wednesday I had the pleasure of listening to the Rose Cafe given by Paul Willcox. I was a bit confused about the topic of the talk as all the information I had was the title. However, I was pleasantly surprised. I did not know anything about track and field before this talk except for some very vague information. There was a large amount of history involved in this talk and I think that made it more interesting for me. Overall, I had never heard of the Transatlantic series. The concept behind it is very intriguing. It is bringing together athletes from two different countries, separated by an ocean. I find it very interesting that they managed to carry the series out even when the athletes had to travel on a ship. To me, this is some serious dedication.

I think that this type of competition is a great idea. I think it is something that would be interesting to do with other areas of life such as with common majors or programs. This kind of opportunity allows a study abroad type experience without having to be away from college. Overall, I was pleasantly surprised by this talk and was very glad that I went.

The Disparity Between the views of the Public and Scientists

The March for science is taking place over this weekend, with it around the corner our table talk was centered around it. There were many ideas discussed, as a non science major I found it very interesting. However, what intrigued me the most was some of the data we discussed.

This data captivated my interest since I assumed the public and scientists agreed that the cause for climate change was caused by human activity. Yet, after seeing this data I began to think why is there a disparity between the view of the public and the scientists. I believe that there are two main causes for this disparity. Firstly, this gap between the view of the public and scientists occur due to the education system. Most people including myself only learnt and understood the severity of climate change and its causes in college. I was not taught about the climate change and the fact that it such a serious problem in present society until I began college. Therefore, I also may have contributed towards the human activities that cause climate change. The solution to this problem is that all students should be educated about climate change and the serious threat it poses to our society at much earlier stage in life than post-secondary education. Those who are unable to attend school should be educated in other ways such as the media about climate change. Therefore, I believe that one cause for such a disparity exists between the public and scientists is due to the education system. 

Secondly, I believe most scientist do not speak out to alert and educate the public about their research and findings. There is more information that scientists have about climate change that the general public does not have. This gap in information also adds to the disparity between the public and scientist on climate change. The solution to this problem is for scientist to make more information about climate change public and in simple laymen terms that are easily understood by people with all different levels of education. This will help more people understand that it is in fact human activity that is causing the plant to get warmer and that we need to all try to reduce activities that harm the planet. 

In conclusion, I believe that the main cause for the disparity between the view of the public and scientist is due to the flaws in the education system and the existence of asymmetric information about climate change that the scientists are aware of but the public is unaware. 

 

Track and Field: Uniting Athletes from the UK to the US

Last week’s Rose Cafe was an extremely interesting talk that shed light on both athletics and cultural exchange (although some would say the two are intertwined. Mr. Paul Wilcox from the UK spoke to us about the Transatlantic series. I had no idea what the Series was prior to the talk and was extremely surprised and impressed to hear about such an international sports tradition! I was definitely proud to hear about Cornell being a part of this sports league.

According to Mr. Wilcox,the Transatlantic Series is a track and field league between Oxford and Cambridge in England and the Ivy League Universities with a four year cycle- with Harvard and Yale touring the UK every four years. Even more surprising to me was hearing that it is the world’s oldest international fixture. As someone who is not particularly interesting in sports, being especially clueless about track and field, what was really interesting was learning about how unique the league by providing participants with cultural exposure and developing friendships across the ocean through the context of sports and high quality competition. The passion in the speaker’s talk really made it clear that this league is much more than just sports, but about international cooperation and unity and friendship.

As an international student who grew up in three different countries, and even as someone simply living in an increasingly globalized world, I think events and opportunities like the Transatlantic Series are extremely important. It is vital that people have the chance to understand different cultures and perspectives and it was really eye opening to learn how sports can offer a platform to do this.

What’s fake

There’s a fine line between being inspired by another person’s work and intentionally imitating a piece of work. During our table talk, we tried to come up with a definition as to what a ‘fake’ piece of work is.  Ultimately, our definition came down to whether or not the artist’s intentions are to purposely gain credit off of the previous artist. If so, then that is a fake. However, if the artist is inspired by another individual’s work and does not claim to be that original artist in any form, then that is not fake work.

The issue with our definition and why this topic is so interesting is because one’s intensions cannot be truly known. Therefore, we thought that the best way to bring to surface the answer is by looking at previous trends and to what extent how is credit given to the original artist.

A Culture of Exchange

I attended Mr. Paul Wilcox’s talk as a part of the Transatlantic Series. I was surprised to learn that our own Dr. Hill organized and created the trophy for the event, as there had been none for the past 80 years. My experience with Track and Field is quite limited, but I enjoyed learning more about its history and development.

What interested me most about the talk was the idea of cultural exchange. Mr. Wilcox noted that the “experience of traveling together as a team and meeting your counterparts (with different cultures, etc.), broadens the mind immensely”. From differences in naming conventions (long jump or broad jump?) to something like having two taps for hot and cold water, learning and experiencing things that aren’t customary is valuable. And I believe that it is this spirit of competition and learning that has allowed the conference to survive the Great Depression and two World Wars. Sports is a perfect platform upon which this exchange may occur, with the Olympic Games being another notable example. Through tough but friendly competition, sport can be a force that unifies people in our world which is more globalized than it has ever been.

 

Unrealistically Nice Characters?

While I enjoyed Hidden Figures, I was slightly uncomfortable with how the film dealt with race. Obviously, I loved seeing black women’s intellects celebrated on the big screen, but I actually felt that the movie’s portrayal of white characters was far too sympathetic. Of the four most prominent white characters (Harrison, Mitchell, Stafford, and Glenn), all four, by the end of the movie, are sympathetic towards the black main characters and take an active role in reducing discrimination against them. This feels somewhat unrealistic, given how pervasive racism was in the 60’s. In addition, much of Katherine Johnson’s achievements in the film are only accomplished because Harrison (a fictional character) goes out of his way to accommodate her. Mary Jackson only becomes an engineer because a white engineer encourages her to do so and a white judge allows her to take classes. This narrative, in the film, feels a bit too similar to the worrisome “white savior” narrative, when a work of art emphasizes how a benevolent white character cures the ills of the people of color. While it is true that these women’s accomplishments were often only possible with the aid of sympathetic white people, it is alarming that the much of the ugliness of the pervasive racism of the time is swept under the rug. This is even more concerning when you consider that both the director and the writer of the film are white.

After watching the film, I thought that perhaps the white characters had been altered from their historical counterparts in order to make them more palatable for white audiences. However, Harrison, Mitchell, and Stafford were all fictional characters created for the movie, and Katherine Johnson actually reported that she didn’t really notice segregation while at NASA. She says, “I didn’t feel the segregation at NASA, because everybody there was doing research. You had a mission and you worked on it, and it was important to you to do your job…and play bridge at lunch. I didn’t feel any segregation. I knew it was there, but I didn’t feel it.” In addition, apparently John Glenn DID have a great deal of respect for Katherine, and really did specifically request that she check the numbers for his launch. All in all, despite some of the disturbing similarities to white savior narratives, it appears that the film was actually mostly accurate in its sympathetic portrayal of the white NASA employees.

What is real and genuine?

This week’s table talk was with GRF Sara. We watched a video from an artist who discussed what is a fake and what and real. The video was extremely dramatic and strange to watch but made some good points for us to discuss and think about. We discussed who owns works of art, music, and other forms of intellectual property and what a copy of these materials are. For some, a copy might be seen as a form of flattery and recognition, but others see copies as a form of stealing. Another student brought up Drake and how many smaller artists feel ripped off by him. Apparently, he uses certain aspects of music from smaller artists than him, but since only a few people know these artists people generally assume that it is Drake’s original work. I wasn’t aware of this until the table talk and was a little upset by this fact. I feel like Drake should give these smaller artists the recognition they deserve, especially since Drake has already capitalized greatly off his work. I feel like as long as someone is not trying to pass off an imitation as the true form, then copies are not horrible. If someone feels inspired enough by a form of art to channel it into their own art, then the original artist is definitely doing something right. However, if someone copies another person’s art and tries to state that they came up with the original idea, then this isn’t right. They are denying the original artist the recognition they deserve. This concept of what is our and what isn’t is especially important in college. When put in tough situations, taking work that doesn’t belong to you seems like an option. We have to realize that these choices hurt the owner of the material. This table talk helped show me the importance of using original work and content.

Running with the British

 

This week at Rose café I heard Paul Wilcox talk about his experience in the transatlantic series a competitive track association. In this association, the Ivy league schools battle Oxford and Cambridge in a series of track and field competitions. The series was founded in 1894, and still exists today. Wilcox talked about his involvement as a runner in his youth, and as a manager now. Back in his day he was a hurdler, who single-handedly challenged some of Cornell’s best hurdlers. Although one might imagine that this series breeds ferocious competition between the world’s most elite schools, Wilcox assured us that the transatlantic series brings its fair share of enlightening and enjoyable experiences to the English runners. He assured us that it’s a pleasure for his athletes to travel to the United States to compete (even if that means they experience a little culture shock).

While I personally don’t know much about track and field, besides the fact that people run, throw things, and jump over things, I was happy to hear his talk. Additionally, I was delighted that I got the chance to meet some of the athletes. I met a young woman named Annabelle who told me she was a high jumper and veterinary student. Immediately I realized how hard it must be for these athletes to travel, work, and compete. I have great respect for student-athletes like Annabelle, and I hope to meet more people like her in the future. In general, this talk was a success, for it forced me to exit the bubble that is my Cornell life and imagine what it’s like to walk, or in this case, to run, in someone else’s shoes.

Life and Art

For last week’s table talk, we discussed the documentary “F” is for Fake.  This documentary was directed and starred in by Orson Wells. It was about infamous fakers Elmyr de Hory and Clifford Irving. De Hory made his name by selling forged works of art by painters like Picasso and Matisse. Irving was infamous for writing a fake autobiography of Howard Hughes.  However, we watched a two-minute excerpt from the movie where Orson Wells’ character begins a dialogue. There were certain quotes that I took from the excerpt and explained my interpretation of these in the table talk. 

The first quote was, “There for centuries, created by men with no signature, there for the celebration of God’s glory and the dignity of man.” He was standing in front of what looked to be a castle and the camera was switching back between him and the castle. I thought this meant that what the structure signified was more important than those who created it.  Another was, “Scientists tell us as a universe which is disposable, works in stone and print last a few decades or a millennium.” “Things fall in war or wear away into the ultimate and universal ash, maybe a man’s name doesn’t matter all that much.” This to me meant that the infamous fakers should not have been outcasted because they committed these crimes, instead, they should have been appreciated for the talents that they possessed. Art tends to physically fade away and new art is always being made. The artists that they were imitating were classic artists, and I feel that the fakers were showing their appreciation for them because they stood the test of time.

“Track”ing across the Atlantic

Before attending the Rose Cafe with Paul Wilcox, I did not actually know what the Transatlantic Series was. However I did remember hearing about the “British track team” being at Cornell and seeing them in the dining halls, without really knowing why they were here. People told me it was to train and compete, but I had no idea that this was a long-standing tradition that started before the Olympics.

The history described by Wilcox was very interesting, and it was obvious that Wilcox is passionate about the Transatlantic Series. It was very interesting to see the progression of the sport through the lens of the Series and it’s connections to Cornell. They were some of the first international sporting matches ever, and Charles Sherril, a competitor in the series, started the starting squat that all track athletes use today. Many of the athletes have gone on to be Olympic champions and world record holders. I think the most interesting thing about this series is the connections made between the schools involved. To be able to bring these teams together, to both combine and compete against one another and be completely immersed in the culture of the school traveled to would be a once-in-a-lifetime experience, and makes the sport even more worthwhile. Being an athlete myself, there is no stronger connection than the shared love for a sport between people. Bringing these two teams together fosters not only skill and strong competition for an exciting meet but creates a bond between these two groups.

I’m glad to have learned about the Transatlantic Series as I now know why there were members of the Oxford track team in Becker for breakfast last week. I think it’s awesome that this tradition has been continued and think that it really enhances not only the experience of the athletes that participate, but the community as a whole by immersing the athletes who don’t attend that school in the culture and practices of the school. The exposure to a different educational environment is mutually beneficial for all involved.

The Transatlantic Series

Tonight’s Rose Café focused on the Transatlantic Series which is a series of track and field competitions between American universities and universities from the United Kingdom. I was previously unaware of the rich history of the series and I enjoyed learning more about the competition. It was interesting to learn that Oxford and Cambridge Universities team up to compete against two North American universities. It must be an interesting experience for the athletes to compete on the same team as their rivals; however, maybe national pride unites the athletes during the competition.

I think it would be interesting to create a similar series in different sports. However, I cannot imagine basketball or football athletes from different institutions temporarily combining into a signal team. Perhaps swimming is a good candidate for a similar transatlantic competition series.

The speaker tonight also displayed great passion for the games. It was clear that the games have had a large impact on his world view. I think his passionate speaks strongly to the value of cultural exchanges at a relatively young age. It would also be valuable to have such a cultural exchange with student-athletes from countries with greater differences. Athletics is a great way to bond and these interactions could go a long way toward increasing sensitivity between nations and cultures.

I was happy to learn about a tradition that Cornell is deeply involved in.

How Would You Like to Be The First

This past Thursday, the Rose Scholars attended a screening of the academy award winning movie Hidden Figures at Cornell Cinema. Personally, when I heard that there was an event to watch this movie and attend a discussion session afterward, I did not hesitate to sign myself up. For various reasons, I was not able to watch this movie in theaters and getting to watch it at school, even on the pseudo bench at the very back of the theater next to another person, made the entire experience worthwhile.

I understood the gist of the movie, about the influence of black women in NASA and its impact on the advancements in exploring space. However, what I had no clue about were the lengths to which these women went to get the recognition they deserved and lay the ground for future generations of minority women. The movie was set in a segregated atmosphere, where the separation between whites and colored people remained a very evident part of society. The acting was phenomenal, to say the least, with one of the main protagonists Katherine Johnson – played by Taraji P. Henson – bringing me to tears in by expressing just how hard it was to be a single mother of three children, be more intelligent than the men she worked with and still be ostracized for her gender and race, and have to struggle with the way the world viewed her. I have never felt more empowered as a Latina woman to hold my head up high, to all the trials and discrimination that will come my way, and simply face it head on to the best of my abilities.

At the end of the screening, there was a discussion about the movie and the influence that Cornell’s math and computer science departments have had on innovations with NASA. It was crazy to learn that without Cornell math department, chances are that the first mission launch to space would either not have been possible or not have occurred when it had. Additionally, the growth of women in the field of computer science has allowed for more opportunities for women in the STEM fields to find careers in mostly male occupied professions. I hope Hollywood continues making films such as this one in the future; one’s that are based on true stories meant to motivate and wake up the youth of today to take advantage of all the privileges we have.

 

 

Myths of opportunity

This week’s film GATTACA was a look forward into a future ruled by eugenics. The protagonist Vincent, in spite of his curiosity and determination, is fated to never achieve his dream of becoming an astronaut due to an impending fatal heart failure. Rather than accept his doom, he cheats the system, adopting the genetic identity of a “superior being” to rise to the top. While the film chronicles our hero’s journey and warns against the destructive potential of genetic engineering, I also evaluated GATTACA as a critique of the America dream.

Perhaps the most disturbing element of the world that GATTACA depicts is the tacitness of eugenics. As Vincent narrates, it was illegal for employers to select candidates based on their genetic dispositions. However, the existence of technology that could alter one’s genetics ensured this was a factor ubiquitous in the ordering of a society. This parallels the vestiges of legal discrimination that leaves inequalities in today’s educational and economic structure. Additionally, the peak of society, as presented by the film, is lonely and unsatisfying. The subtle conflict between Vincent and Jerome represents this much more effectively than the cliched “clash of brothers” (Anton vs Vincent). Jerome, born with a genetic superiority than many could only dream, is unable to achieve perfection and victory in swimming competitions. His suicide at the end of the film is an admission that Vincent had done something that he never could by achieving his dream. This accomplishment rendered the original Jerome superfluous.

The Transatlantic Series and community building

In case you couldn’t tell by everything about me, I am not the most athletic person. In fact, if you placed me in a room with a randomly selected group of people, there is a pretty good chance that I would even be the least athletic person in that room. Despite my best efforts (and my father’s, bless his heart), I have never found any great passion or aptitude for doing sports, and with the exception of hockey I am generally not that keen on watching sports either. (I’m excluding the Olympics here. I rally hard for the Olympics.) That said, 20 years on I am more or less sports literate in that I understand basic rules of most of the popular sports and only sometimes forget that the Superbowl is a thing until the day of the Superbowl. I am not track and field literate. My knowledge of the sport before the talk began and ended with “People run various distances, jump various heights, and throw various things”. My strategy whenever I had to run a mile in gym class was to jog the straightaways and walk the corners of the track field. Now that all the track and field people are cringing and/or laughing and/or shaking their heads, let’s move on to my thoughts on Mr. Paul Wilcox’s talk. All of said thoughts should be taken with a grain of salt because, as I’ve mentioned, I know nothing.

What interested me most about the talk when I read about it was first the title because I have a weakness for talking about life and world views, and second was the history of the Transatlantic Series, something I hand’t even heard of before the talk. How do you get nerds to a sports talk? History! It was really interesting to hear about the series from Mr. Wilcox who is clearly very passionate and invested in it. I thought it was incredible how this competition has survived through two world wars, the Depression, and countless other tests of time. I think what makes this series so resilient to the winds of change is precisely what Mr. Wilcox mentioned or alluded to multiple times in his talk: the Transatlantic Series isn’t just about track and field. It is an opportunity for athletes and coaches to experience something new, to make connections with people who share their passion, to travel to new places, and above all a way for people to use their sport to expand their world view. From competing with members of a team usually considered their rivals, to connecting with student athletes from another country, to seeing the long lasting effect this opportunity has from people like Mr. Wilcox and Dr. Hill, the Transatlantic Series is about much more than track and field (though I don’t think that bit should be discounted either). It has very clearly built a strong community and as such has been able to continue the tradition for many years.

Sports and Cultural Differences

This Wednesday I was able to participate the talk given by the Honorary Secretary of the Achilles Club, Mr. Paul Willcox. To be honest, I do not have much knowledge about sports. I was pleasantly surprised to learn about the history of transatlantic series, which started two years before the Olympics Games.

Every year, athletes in the U.S. go to England to compete as well as experience their cultures; and athletes from Oxford and Cambridge come to U.S. colleges to do the same. As a matter of fact, the athletes are in Cornell right now.

There are two things that Mr. Willcox mentioned that I find very interesting. First of all, the athletes coming from England to compete are also under the pressure of studying for their finals, which will take place right after they go back to England. While the U.S. athletes will go to England in June, they will be more relaxed, since they have already finished their finals. But athletes in England might be in a disadvantageous situation because they will be out of school for a while, which means they will not be in training for sometime. I have always wonder how do athletes balance their academics and training. For me, I do not join too many clubs or extracurricular activities simply because homework takes up too much of my time. I cannot imagine how much pressure athletes have from both school work and sports. Second of all, Mr. Willcox mentioned that the funding provided for athletes to come to the U.S. is rather limited. While in the U.S., the culture of giving is very prevalent and alumni make big donations, in England, donation is quite difficult. Mr. Willcox explained that this is due to cultural differences. In England, people are more low key about their lives and tend to hide their wealth; whereas in the U.S., success is more acknowledged and celebrated, which justify the act of donating. This difference is also discernible from daily conversations. When being asked ‘how’s it going’, in England, people tend to reply with ‘could be worse’, whereas people in t he U.S. tend to reply with ‘I’m good’. It is very interesting to see that even though we speak the same language, cultural differences have a profound impact on the institutions and systems of particular regions.

In short, this talk was very insightful as it went beyond the history of sports and touched the social and cultural aspects beneath it.

Untold Stories: Hidden Figures

Hidden Figures (2016) came out at a time that appeared to be a promising transition from the first African-American president to the first female president, when the political and social tensions in this country were rising heatedly but remained very much hopeful; that not being the case, the film, like many others from recent years—Dear White People (2014), Fences (2016), Moonlight (2016)—serves as a reminder of the perpetual systematic oppression that is the historical backbone this country continues to live on. It is very refreshing to watch empowered black women on the big screen in a Hollywood production, which is rarely the case (maybe Dear White People comes close to it, but even that was an independent film that did not engage with that dialogue specifically). Hidden Figures was both informative and entertaining; it was energizing to witness these women succeed in assisting the space race in the mid-1960s as human computers and somewhat shed a heroic light on stories that oftentimes remain unrecognized. Hidden Figures not only introduces an important conversation on race but also on women in STEM field research. It is interesting to take this in light of recent changes to the Barbie doll collection which now offer Barbie’s in different shapes and sizes (tall/petite/curvy) and advertisements for kids such as the “Princess Machine” or the Verizon video that promote the messy, lab-like, building-block child’s play catered for young girls.

Comparing the U.S. and U.K. Through Sports

On Wednesday, I went to the Rose Cafe hosted by Mr. Paul Wilcox, the Honorary Secretary of the Achilles Club – a club for Oxford and Cambridge track and field athletes. It was interesting to learn about what it was like to be an athlete in the late 1890s and 1900s. I learned that the Transatlantic Series had brought a team across the Atlantic before the Olympic games had started.

We learned about some important figures in these competitions, namely Charles Sherrill, who pioneered the crouched starting position for running in 1894. Eddie Gourdin, an African-American, set the world record for long jump: 25 ft, 3 in – a huge win. Another record was Roger Bannister running a mile in under 4 minutes. The many photos and videos that Mr. Wilcox showed us truly captured these momentous occasions, while also showing how these competitions have changed over the years, along with athletic clothing and training methods.

Mr. Wilcox brought up what an experience it was for a team to travel together across an ocean on a ship for a week. They had the opportunity to see a different culture and perspective. He also discussed some differences between the U.S. and U.K., particularly greetings and donating to your alma mater. In the U.S., it is strongly encouraged to donate to your alma mater, yet frowned upon in the U.K. Attitudes are also different: asking “How are you” to an American may bring a “Pretty good” response, while in the U.K., one may respond “Not too bad.”

Overall, this talk broadened my understanding of athletics from an international perspective. I learned quite a lot, especially how much training is required to excel as a world-class athlete in track and field. I look forward to future Rose Cafes to keep expanding my knowledge.

Political Satire and Black Comedy

This week’s Flora’s film was the 1964 movie Dr. Strangelove. Before watching it, I read some of the reviews and learned that it had nearly universal critical acclaim. Some even describe it as one of the best comedies of all time. I had really high expectations going into it, and I have to say that I really enjoyed the movie. It was simultaneously absurd and tragic, satirical and concerning. The basic premise is that a mentally deranged general oversteps his authority and orders the dropping of a nuclear bomb on Russia. The president and top politicians and generals try desperately to stop it and save humanity but of course nuclear warfare ends with only one outcome and that is complete destruction. Even though this movie was made in 1964, it seems like the world today is once again on the brink of nuclear war, between North Korea, Russia, China, and the United States.
It is really interesting to note how comedy and satire often make a distressing situation somehow seem more bearable. I personally don’t think I would have mentally survived the last election season if it weren’t for late night TV and internet memes. Even though comedy is silly and light-hearted, I think it’s a truly necessary part of society.

What does a ‘Fake’ mean with regard to nature of authorship?

The table talk on “F is for Fake” was based on the ideas presented by Orson Welles in his documentary. Initially released in 1974, “F is for Fake focuses on Elmyr de Hory’s recounting of his career as a professional art forger; de Hory’s story serves as the backdrop for a fast-paced, meandering investigation of the natures of authorship and authenticity, as well as the basis of the value of art. Loosely a documentary, the film operates in several different genres and has been described as a kind of film essay.

When we began discussing the documentary by Welles I was confused by the ideas and the message that he wanted to convey to his audience since I did not understand the model used to define what a fake is as many definitions apply to the term. Yet, as the discussion progressed and we agreed on a model to define what fake really means with regard to authorship it helped me understand the message that Welles was trying to convey through his documentary.

We decided that for something to be fake there has to be an original and that the thing that is “fake” is merely a copy of the original. Thus, unless an original exists a fake cannot exist with regard to authorship. For example, if I were to use my friend’s login credentials and post a blog on her behalf that blog post would not be classified as a fake as I am writing something while stealing her identity, which can be classified as impersonation as opposed to being a fake. Therefore, a fake means the copy or forgery of an original piece of art (music, literature, film, painting, sculpture etc.) and if and only if an original exists to copy off of will it be classified as a fake.

 

Knowing Your Rights: Immigration

President Donald Trump Recently Proposed a travel ban prohibiting entrance of refugees from Iran, Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Libya, Yemen and Somalia into the United states in an effort to stop ‘radical Islamic Terrorism’ from entering the United States. This ban also prohibits green card holders and refugees who have already undergone background checks from entering the US. Understandably, this executive order has been met with outrage and concern throughout the nation. Now many immigrants are concerned that the new approach shown by the Trump Administration may end with unjust deportation. I attended the discussion on understanding President Trump’s Executive order, held by Matthew Hall, Professor Steve Yale-Loehr, Brendan O’Brien, and Pakistani Author Raza Rumi, to better learn what changes we could reasonably expect as an effect of this executive order. I was encouraged to learn, form the ensuing discussion that this executive order is being battled in the courts, and that there is legislation that protects students attending Cornell from immigration officers. Although the executive order has adversely affected millions of Americans, including students here at Cornell and around the nation, I hope that this discussion provided some measure of security and a show of solidarity for those affected by this executive order.

Thoughts on the Super Bowl

Each Year, a significant portion of the american populace gather in front of their televisions to watch the biggest sporting event of the year, the Super Bowl. this year, the New England Patriots and the Atlanta Falcons will play for the glory of raising the Lombardi Trophy. Off the field, a large commercial onslaught occurs as, corporations and businesses all battle for one of the coveted commercial spots that air between the plays. The NFL has lost a large amount of its appeal for me over the years. The NFL seems very artificial and restrained to me; in fact, I have switched to college football as my primary source of sports entertainment because of the NFL has been going. With Massively commercialized games to rampant off the field issues that some of the athletes get themselves into, I’ve looked elsewhere for entertainment. Hopefully some changes will be made by the time Super Bowl 52 comes around.

Sports’ Alternative Role

This past Rose Cafe series featured Mr. Paul Wilcox, the Honorary Secretary of the Achilles Club since 1987. He talked about the Transatlantic Series, a track and field series that took place and invited participants from various higher education institutions in both England and the United States. I found this talk interesting because I did track and field in middle school and for a season in high school, so I could personally relate to the role sports played in my life in bridging communication gaps within society and the community.

I especially enjoyed how Mr. Wilcox touched upon this communication power that sports has on different communities and cultures. The Olympics is a modern example of really bringing the world together through athletic talent; but more so, the Olympics shows a sign of sportsmanship and unity. Mr. Wilcox emphasized how the experience of traveling together as teammates and meeting counterparts from the other side of the world really broadens the mind. I can wholeheartedly agree with this statement.

Mr. Wilcox also discussed the history of different relays which I found interesting as I love learning about history, and having not known how far back track and field travels, it was cool to see how the sport has developed to further bring people from different cultures and organizations together.

A Film Worth Watching Twice

I saw Hidden Figures for the first time over winter break and really enjoyed it, so I was excited to see it for the second time at Cornell Cinema tonight. Even though I remembered the plot clearly from my first watching, I came away from tonight’s showing with a lot of new insights into the film. For one thing, it was a very different experience to see the film in a packed theater with people laughing, clapping, and commenting throughout. While I have been to many films where the audience clapped at the end, I thought it was great tonight that people clapped throughout the film after the scenes in which the protagonists stood up to the racist and sexist hierarchy they encountered at NASA.

I also found the talk and discussion after the film added a lot to my understanding of the themes the film portrays. While Hidden Figures is a very upbeat film with a typical “Hollywood ending” in which the female protagonists succeed in their career goals despite the obstacles of racism and sexism, Professor Weeden provided an important reality check on the continued lack of female and minority representation in the computer science field. I was very surprised to learn that even at Cornell, which is above the national average, only 20-some percent of computer science undergrads are women.

Additionally, I really enjoyed hearing other people’s opinions on the film as a whole in the discussion time. One person expressed the idea that parts of the film promote a white savior mentality by portraying many of the gains the women achieved as stemming from concessions from the white male establishment. While I agree that some of the scenes could be read this way, I also thought that many scenes in the film, like when one of the protagonists smuggles a book out of the segregated library so that she can teach herself computer programming, emphasized the women’s agency and initiative in securing changes in their lives. Listening to her viewpoint on the film, however, definitely encouraged me to analyze the film’s message more critically and be aware of potential issues with the portrayal of these “hidden figures.”

Cultural Differences Through Sport

Yesterday I had an opportunity to listen to a talk made by Mr. Paul Wilcox about the Transatlantic Series, a track and field series which was first contested 2 years before the olympic games with contestants from prestigious institutions in England and America. It was quite fortuitous that I stumbled upon this talk as earlier in the day I noticed a group of athletes speaking with English accents and assumed they were at Cornell for a track and field meet. Little did I know that that night I would be able to learn more about and partake in the rich history of this event with a long and rich tradition.

The talk was an interesting exploration about the role sports plays in society and higher education. In particular, I really liked how Mr Wilcox talked about how sports can be used as a tool to bridge the gap between cultural and organizational differences. According to Mr Wilcox, when traveling with a group of people who are passionate about a sport, you often bond because of this shared love in an unfamiliar setting. The series is also a great opportunity for British students to learn more about life in American higher education and vice versa, learning more about the differences in culture through interactions with students and faculty. One observation in particular that I found interesting was how the differences in how people great each other mirrors cultural norms. As Professor Hill put it, in America when you ask people how they are doing, people would often respond with “good” or some similar variation. In England, people instead respond by saying “not to bad”, showing that boastfulness is looked down upon in England much more compared to America.

Another difference that Mr Wilcox pointed out that I found interesting is the spirit of giving. In America, rich alumnus are encouraged and sometimes expected to donate to their Alma Mater after becoming successful. In England, quite the opposite belief is held. Instead, the mere act of donating to your Alma Mater is considered an ostentatious act of bragging and is highly discouraged. While English is the official language in both UK and America, cultural differences is an area that people from both countries can stand to become more educated about. Hence it is important for the Olympics and the Transatlantic Series continue to be held in order to bridge the differences that separate nations in this rich tapestry of the world.

The Real Story Behind Sports

Yesterday, Mr. Paul Wilcox spoke with the Rose Scholars about the importance of sports in Britain over the course of two centuries. He is the Honorary Secretary of the Achilles Club – a track and field club for Oxford and Cambridge athletes – and is therefore well educated in the origins of track and field and how it molded the best of people. It was interesting to hear the importance of being an athlete in the late 1800s and early 1900s. Students would be removed from class for over a week at times to train and compete for the soul purpose of representing their country and winning the gold. Even before the Olympic Games became a huge event, the British were hosting the Transatlantic Games to bring forth athletes during that time.

I loved how Mr. Wilcox showed so many historical black and white photos of track athletes, military men, and college students. It was incredible to see how clothing, athletic physique, and methods of training have evolved over the years. Today, there is no doubt that America has some of the best, highest quality machines to develop and athletes body into a future first place, gold medalist. But more than that, it was so touching to see how much athletes really treasured what they did, the training they endured, and the success they achieved in representing themselves and their country. Nowadays, it seems like athletes are much more interested in making lots of money, having tons of sponsors, and simply becoming a big name. There are definitely still some athletes that practice their sport for the love of the game, but with the rise in popularity and fame and fortune, it is hard for many to remember what they stand for.

I think that the amount of training necessary to be a successful track and field star is ridiculous; the stamina and drive necessary to run hundreds of meters or even short distance requires both mental and physical training that cannot be learned overnight. It was a pleasure having Mr. Wilcox, and I hope to meet more athletes from Cornell in the future.

What is fake news? (and, a piece of fake news)

In the fake news table talk, we addressed what fake news is, and how we can help stop the spread of fake news.

For me, fake news is anything that the media publishes that is misleading (intentionally or not), or perpetuating wrong information. In my opinion, the media should be held accountable to fact check their information and they are responsible to publishing the right information. However, the public should also take all the news/information that they read with a grain of salt–that is especially true if you have access to the education and resources that allow you to fact check and critically think about what you’re reading. However, I don’t find the fake news issue to be too critical amongst our society today. By that, I mean that I don’t necessarily distrust news networks; I give them some benefit of the doubt, but I do try to read the news without getting my emotions involved so I can logically piece the article together. Does it make sense? What are the implications of this event and what are some of the historical background that relates to this? News networks will often try to get us to feel/respond a certain way (sometimes unintentionally, sometimes intentionally) just through the rhetoric of the article and the way it is presented. CNN tends to be liberal, and Fox will be conservative, etc. Fox will vilify the liberal agenda and CNN the opposite, for example. But, if we take out the subjectiveness in these media pieces, then we can better judge for ourselves the validity of the articles.

Here I will be sharing something I consider “fake news.” Taiwan recently banned eating dog and cat meat.  CNN wrote an article about it.

Here’s what’s true:

  • Taiwan recently banned eating dog/cat meat
  • Individuals who eat or trade dog or cat meat can now be fined between $1,640 and $8,200.
  • Pretty much all the facts in this article.

But here’s what makes it “fake news”:

  • The article almost unintentionally (or intentionally) make the reader believe that Taiwan is a country that has participated in eating dog/cat meat through the random pieces of information about other Asian countries that eat dog/cat meat. The videos and pictures were all taken in China. 
  • Fact is that nobody eats dog/cat meat. Taiwan just decided that they needed a law so they knew what to do when they catch people who do it. But the population of people who eat dog/cat meat in Taiwan is extremely rare. As in, it’s not part of our culture at all.

This article is an article based on truth, yes, but there are so many parts of it that make this article misleading. It gives people who are not familiar to Taiwan the wrong ideas about the country and almost paint it in a negative light by including all the videos/pictures of animal abuse in China.

As a person who regular reads CNN, I’m actually quite disappointed in their coverage of this legislation. But it just shows that even a piece with all the facts can be misleading, just in another way.

Immunotherapy (Table Talk 3/20)

Immunotherapy is a fairly new development in medicine that boosts the body’s natural defense system in order to fight cancer. There are several ways to do this, including stopping/slowing the growth of cancer cells and boosting the immune system to identify and fight cancer cells. This talk was really interesting to me as a premed student and I was really impressed with GRF Shiv’s knowledge on this topic as well as his passion for this field.

I will say the talk left me a bit confused at times simply because most of the content of this table talk included very specified knowledge. That said, it only encouraged me more to look up the information afterwards, and in my own time I was able to learn more about it myself and reinforce the knowledge GRF Shiv passed on to us.

After the table talk and my own web-searching, I found out that there are many different methods of immunotherapy. Antibodies can be made in a lab and then used to detect/flag cancer cells so that the body knows to destroy them. Another interesting one was using genetically modified viruses to kill cancel cells. Finally, T-cells can be modified to treat cancer as well (CAR-T therapy). I find these developments in research to be encouraging for the future of medicine. Because there are so many different types of cancer and cancer cells vary from person to person, we’re still having trouble securing a “cure” for cancer. But perhaps the day that we do won’t be too far from now!

Take Me To Carnival

Two weeks ago Andre Rozemberg Prixoto Simores, an agricultural economist from Brazil, spoke to the Rose Scholars about the beautiful country of Brazil. He focuses on the crops that are grown in the country and the fertility of the soil in order to benefit the fruits that are produced each season. During his lecture, he spoke about the various states within the country of Brazil, the one’s that are popular as well as the one’s that contain more naturistic landscapes that are less inhabited. As expected, Mr. Simores spoke about the love of soccer that is embedded in Brazil’s culture; I can not deny Brazil’s team being one of the best soccer team’s in the world every year. Personally, I try to not cheer for Brazil’s team during the World Cup, which happens every four years, simply because they always make it to the semi-finals. I like rooting for the underdogs.

Brazil is a country filled with so much beauty and history that tourists can really gain many life lessons and experiences by visiting. A part of Brazil that has always touched my heart are the favelas that continue to be a large part of Brazil’s impoverished society. As Mr. Simores explained, though Brazil is rich in agriculture and tourism, an important part of the country is the corrupt government that rules as well as the huge gap between the very rich and the extremely poor. The favelas are made up of houses built practically on top of each other, with children wearing barely any clothes and the families have very limited access to water. Additionally, the Amazon Rainforest, that remains home to many indigenous tribes, contains poverty as well, though tourism in these areas keeps these families alive.

I personally would love to visit Brazil some day. As a child of two Peruvian parents, Bazil is a neighboring country that contains such rich flora and fauna with historical landmarks that it has always been a dream for my family to travel there. More importantly, as a lover of dance, attending Carnival to enjoy the people, the food, and all the festivities is something I plan on crossing off my bucket list some day. It was wonderful having Mr. Simones and his wife here to speak with us. It is also inspiring to know that he is staying at Cornell, gaining knowledge to bring back to his home country so as to make it a better place.

Learning about other cultures through competition

As a runner, I found Paul Wilcox’s talk tonight particularly interesting. I haven’t competed in a track event since high school, but listening to Mr. Wilcox talk about track and field and watching old videos of races made me want to get back out there on the track.

Mr. Wilcox discussed the history of The Transatlantic Series, a competition in which university track and field athletes from the US and the UK cross the ocean to compete against each other. Started in 1894, two years before the first Olympic Games, The Transatlantic Series has been bringing students from different cultures together for over a century. It not only gives students an opportunity to get to know athletes from across the Atlantic, but also from other schools within their own country, since the competition places rival schools on the same team, such as Cornell and Penn vs. Oxford and Cambridge.

Participating in The Transatlantic Series sounds like an incredible experience, allowing students to compete against new competitors and learn about differences between the two cultures. In a world where countries are always in disagreement, it is amazing how events like the Transatlantic Series, the Olympic Games, and the World Cup are able to bring people together from rival schools or rival countries over a common love of excelling at their sport. 

Finding Unity in Competition

Paul Wilcox’s discussion of the Transatlantic Series and the Achilles Club really underscored how coming together through sports, competition, and shared passions creates a common ground from which people with different backgrounds and worldviews can come together to learn from perspectives that are different from their own. I rowed throughout my four years of high school, and each year, members of the Men’s and Women’s rowing teams of St. Edwards Oxford, a boarding school in England, came to visit my high school in Philadelphia. Though my experience was not nearly as steeped in history and tradition as is the Achilles Club and the Transatlantic Series, I can enthusiastically agree with Mr. Wilcox’s assessment of how interesting, informative, and fun it can be to have the freedom to look at life in a different way. Even though I never went to visit St. Edward’s in England, I learned so much by just talking with the rowers about everyday, taken-for-granted differences. The students from St. Edward’s, for example, found yellow school buses to be exciting and fascinating because they had never ridden in one but had seen them in the movies. My teammates and I, however, had drastically different interpretations of the desirability of riding the bus to Boathouse Row. This example of the school buses is just one of the multitudes of differences between the United States and the United Kingdom that we discussed. In fact, most of our conversations centered around this topic. As the sentiments of Mr. Wilcox and Dr. Hill captured, it can be really inspiring and refreshing to learn that a vast and yet-to-be-discovered world exists outside of our everyday experiences.

As in the Transatlantic Series, there was some friendly competition between our two schools. After practicing together for about a week, boats from my high school and boats from St. Edward’s raced each other in the Head of the Schuylkill. Interestingly, rowers from both my high school and St. Edward’s  even joined as a crew to compete together in some races. Combing this experience of cultural sharing with the experience of coming together as teammates or competitors to celebrate a common dedication to a sport is really powerful. It is difficult to describe, but I believe that perhaps this power stems from the fact that after finding out just how different our lives, perspectives, and traditions may be, we find out how fundamentally similar we all are. We share a desire to continually improve, a desire to endure for the sake of our teammates, and a desire to win. After learning about the rich history of the Achilles Club and Transatlantic Series, I can certainly see why someone would want to re-experience this tradition eighty years later.

Environmental Diversity in Brazil

Watching the 2016 Summer Olympics, I was fascinated by the culture and landscape of Rio de Janiero, Brazil. The beautiful coastlines, colorful art, and the tropical climate showed the vibrant and warm atmosphere of Brazil’s people and their surroundings. Brazil is the fifth largest country in the world by area and population and has one of the largest economies in the world. The country’s rich history and breathtaking natural reserves make it the ideal tourist destination and one of the most popular countries in South America. Even though I was aware of the Brazil’s contribution to world tourism, I was more interested in learning about Brazil’s economy and the lifestyle of its citizens. Andre Simores’s talk about Brazil opened my eyes to the modern economy and society in Brazil and how land and climate affect day to day living in the country.

Andre started out by mentioning that the work culture in Brazil is slightly different that in the US. People usually get a two-hour break for lunch during which they go home to have a heavy meal full of rice, beans, and meat, and then return to work. The hot and humid climate in Brazil is not conducive to working outdoors for long periods of time, therefore workers usually take long lunch breaks to cool down before starting work again. Andre works in the agriculture industry mainly with dairy production. His area of expertise deals with dairy supply chains and the diffusion of innovation among dairy farmers and technology. Andre showed us different images of regions across Brazil. The terrain and landscape varied through each of these regions and I was surprised to see how the climate and environment changed from one region to another. While Andre and his family, reside in a hot and humid region, there are wetlands, deserts, and tropical lands scattered all over Brazil. The diversity of Brazil’s land truly makes it one of the most desirable places to visit in the world.

Andre Simores’ Brazil

At the past Rose Cafe, we had the pleasure of listening to Andre Simores talk about his home country of Brazil. Previously, my knowledge on the country was mostly comprised of the Amazon Rainforest, Rio Carnival, and their national soccer team. In Andre’s talk, however, I was introduced to a wide range of topics concerning Brazil that have perked my curiosity to learn more about this multifaceted country.

Andre started out the talk by giving us all a quick geography lesson. Through his presentation of the various landscapes found in Brazil via google images, I was surprised to see such a variety. From deserts to forest to their own version of the Everglades here in the United States, I don’t know why I never bothered to imagine anything other than a tropical environment, especially considering Brazil’s status as the 5th largest country in the world.

The talk then shifted to more specific topics, including the agriculture and educational system in Brazil. Some of the main exports Andre mentioned were raw sugar, soybeans, and poultry meat, which I found pretty surprising to note. Andre didn’t talk too much about the dairy industry that he is involved with, which I think would have been interesting to hear and compare to that of the United States. In regards to the education system, Andre noted how in Brazil, the top universities in the country were public institutions that only those that had the opportunity of attending a private preparatory school were able to go to. This type of system, sometimes completely opposite of the United States, tends to contributes to the unequal distribution of wealth in the country that Andre also spoke on.

Overall, it was a pleasure to attend this event. I came in not thinking of Brazil outside of the World Cup and came out with newfound knowledge and curiosity about this dynamic country.

 

Physical & Economic Geography of Brazil

After hearing Andre speak about how the physical geography of Brazil varies vastly within the country, I was interested in learning more about the huge contrast. The fact that Brazil holds both the Amazon Rainforest and Brazilian Highlands is particularly captivating for those exploring the country. After reading about both the rainforest and Highlands, something interesting I found out is that the Amazon River is home to approx. 1/3 of all known animal species and makes up half of the world’s rainforests. Considering this information and taking into account the Highlands, it can be concluded that Brazil’s topography is pretty diverse, making it interesting to study and visit.

In terms of Brazil’s economic geography, Sao Paulo is responsible for about half of the country’s GDP and 2/3 of manufacturing. Something noteworthy about this topic is the fact that Brazil’s sugar cane production (12% of the world total) is used to create gasohol which powers a portion of Brazilian automobiles. Given the fact that Brazil’s key industry is automobile production, we can see that Brazil is vertically integrating its production, which is an interesting strategy.

Democratic Change and Ethanol

I really enjoyed last week’s Rose Cafe with Andre Simores from the Mato Grosso do Sul State University in Brazil. During the talk, he touched on a multitude of topics related to his native country, but I particularly enjoyed two of the topics in particular, because I believe they can be related to events in our own country in recent times.

Simores mentioned how in Brazil, there exists fuel made from 100% sugar cane ethanol, and how this supports a vast agricultural industry while also reducing fossil fuel emissions. I mentioned that in the U.S., we also have fuel partially made from ethanol, although in our case, it’s made from corn. I have conflicted feelings about the use of ethanol. On one hand, as Brazil demonstrates, it can be quite effective in cutting down on pollution, but in the United States, it has caused a negative economic impact due to the existence of vast, unsustainable subsidies provided to agribusiness (I wonder if this is also the case in Brazil?). In the end, I think I would support its usage, although I wonder if there’s a way to easily break up agricultural oligopolies in existence.

I also asked Simores about the recent impeachment of President Dilma Rousseff. He claimed that this was the exercise of democracy in a nation which had only recently transitioned from authoritarian rule, but qualified that the policies made by the Workers Party of Rousseff and her predecessor, Lula de Silva, had benefited many by bridging the divide between the poor and the rich. He also seemed to imply an impeachment had been politically motivated. I think this raises interesting questions about President Trump. Would it be fair to remove him from office, or would this be an abuse of our democratic institutions?

 

Life in Brazil

Last Wednesday, Andre Simores, a professor at Mato Grosso do Sul State University, came to give a brief talk about his life and experiences in Brazil. He specifically targeted points of interests such as the famed Rio de Janeiro and spoke about the local landscapes and cultures of cities of Brazil that he has visited in the past. Since most of my exposure with Brazil comes from the Olympics, it was eye-opening to listen to different experiences of someone who has been there for most of their life.

The first difference that Professor Simores pointed about between Brazil and Ithaca is certainly the weather. Since Brazil is near the equator it barely gets cold there while we recently had a snow storm that gave us a cozy snow day. But besides the expected weather difference, I was surprised when Professor Simores pointed out a cultural difference. In Brazil, people typically eat a dinner-type of meal (rice, beans, meats, etc.) during lunch time while resorting to breads, milks, and cheeses for dinners. He had said that he did not expect there to be a full course meal for dinner and I thought this was interesting since I would certainly be hungry if I only ate breads and cheeses for dinner.

In addition, beyond listing some small cultural differences, Professor Simores introduced to us a lot of the different landscapes that decorate the land of Brazil. For instance, there’s the Amazon Rainforest, which is a popular for tourists and researchers since there are vast number of species and organisms that inhabit the woods. There’s also the Pantanal, which is the world’s largest tropical wetland area. In fact, this destination has been here for so long that the horses here have evolved to the point where they can navigate through the wetlands easily!

But besides talking about the points of interests in Brazil, Professor Simores also talked about the education system in Brazil. And much like how tutoring is in the United States, people who have the resources to get an early advantage (which, in Brazil, is done through private high schools) are typically the ones to go to better universities. This is certainly a problem that is plaguing Brazil since there’s a definite line between the rich and the poor. Professor Simores attributes this to a lot of government corruption. And while he thinks that it’s going to take some time to fix, Brazil is certainly moving forward and starting to rebuild their economy for a better future.

Two Men Enter; One Man Leaves

On Friday, we watched Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome and since this is the first time I have watched any of the Mad Max films, I did not have much to work with in terms of expectations. While much of the plot was a bit confusing to me in the beginning, a quote that stood out to me was during the fight between Mad Max and Blaster, the giant that was being controlled by a man named Master. The fight was in a dome/nest like enclosure with the rules being “Two men enter, one man leaves.”. In the context of the fight, I didn’t think that this quote meant much. In fact, it was to be taken literally since it would be an all-out fight where one man would kill the other.

However, I did feel that this quote played back to the end of the movie when Mad Max sacrifices himself to let all the children and Master leave on the plane. It seems that Mad Max “entered” the mission to save the children since the children were seeking to return to a civilized world. And in order for them to leave, Mad Max had to be the one who was left behind in order for the others to survive.

What I did not get, however, was why Mad Max would even risk his life for the others. Once he comes upon the children that have been hiding and waiting for a captain to bring them to salvation, Mad Max immediately denies that he’s their savior. Instead, he claims that he is just a regular man that happened to pass by. But his actions say otherwise. This led to me to think that Mad Max was the indirect meaning of his quote. When he sees that the children are in danger, he puts himself out there to save them and in doing so risks his own life.

All in all, I think that the movie was okay. I was not particularly interested in the plot itself since it was a bit confusing for me to jump straight into the third movie of the series. However, I am certainly interesting in checked out the previous installments to see what they hold.

Andre Simons at Cornell

Two weeks ago, we welcomed Andre Simores to Cornell, a visiting agricultural economist who spoke to us about life in Brazil and the agricultural economy. He had spoken to us about his experience being a professor at Brazil, and the differences between American educational institutions and Brazilian educational institutions. In his opinion, American institutions are much more prosperous than Brazilian institutions. To me, likely reasons for this are that American institutions are largely research facilities, and therefore draw faculty who want to do research. Furthermore, the cost of attendance is 60k+ a year, and therefore the university receives funding to provide the best educational opportunities possible.

I enjoyed the part of the talk when Simores used google maps and google images, with the aid of his girlfriend, to show us the geography of Brazil, and the locations of the cities that he lived in and other populated cities. I was not familiar with the geography of Brazil nor the scenery and agriculture, and enjoyed this casual way of becoming better affiliated with it. Before this talk, I was only really familiar with Rio de Janiro due to the olympics.

Finally, as he is an agriculture economist, Simores also spoke to us about the agricultural economy in Brazil. He stated that Brazil’s agricultural economy was not nearly as well developed as the United States’ in some parts.

Altogether, I really enjoyed the insight Simores had to offer on various topics, and enjoyed his cafe.

Our Mad World

Being a huge fan of the lore in Mad Max: Fury Road, I could appreciate the underlying messages concerning gender hierarchies and preservation, but I admit I expected the older films to be pure entertainment with outrageous cars and wild shoot-em-up scenes. For what I thought would be a solely adrenaline-rush film, Mad Max: Beyond Thunderdome tackled large overarching systemic problems inherent in society from the dawn of civilization. Civilization itself is the main target of Mad Max: Beyond Thuderdome as it lambastes man’s systems of control and capability for self-destruction.

The post-apocalyptic civilizations present in the movie are the base-instinct driven Bartertown and the pious youth of the oasis. Bartertown for its part is a slum laid in filth where man live beside beast as they are ruled over by resource controlling elites who keep the inhabitants preoccupied with pleasures to the senses. Even the name of the town reveals man’s first intent after bringing himself to ruin, to once again begin reconstructing the market to gather resources that support their self-indulging life styles. As a stark juxtaposition, the only other civilization to develop is that of lost boys who live off the oasis. The band of innocent youth are meant to be portrayed as untouched by knowledge and greed filled desires that drive Bartertown, and instead devoting their lives to a belief-system which revolves around “the knowing” and a promise of great technological treasures. The setting immediately invites analogies of Hell and Eden, as man with all his knowledge of machinery and harnessing methane must live in a brutal, unclean hole while the children who have yet to been enlightened by “the knowing” live in perpetual youth in harmony with the Earth. Avoiding any further reading into Biblical-lessons that an interpretation of this story with the Moses-like Mad Max could invite, I believe the depicted communities exemplifies the film’s critiques of control systems and harmful tendencies.

Both groups show a part of our world to reveal underlying influences on our lives. In the community of the children, they build elaborate myths founded on their idealistic interpretation of Viewmaster images. These legends are purported as fact when Max fulfills their prognostication, creating the foundation for a civilization similar to many modern systems in belief and values.  Bartertown portrays the less moralistic side to our society, exposing our lust for self-indulgence. The largest and most important example demonstrating this is the Thunderdome. The rules that govern the Thunderdome are barbaric, nonsensical, and base, yet serve as the only system of order to control the population. It’s the only set of rules all participants in this community agree to since it fills their need for viewing violence and perpetuating the persistent rule of “might makes right.” Bartertown and Thunderdome draw comparison to our world through their economic system and technology, but reveal the unpleasant side of our civilization. In the same way that religious lies control the community of children, the world of adults is controlled by elites who satiate our ignoble needs. Adults are given a code of law written by Aunty Entity and promoted  by hidden figures interested in distracting society. These figures present themselves as the announcer who represents secretive interests at play controlling our attention while working against us. His allegiance to secret societies is exposed as he bares the masonic square and compass while coaxing denizens to have faith in the entrapping system. Mad Max 3 serves to warn viewers how the systems that dictate our actions are man-made constructs vulnerable to lies and abuse.

In the world of Mad Max there still exists hope when the children, though they were convinced into staying ignorant and confined to the oasis, finally make it to their promised land to start a new society with passing settlers. To prosper as humans, the goal is then to go beyond the Thunderdome, to in some spiritual sense go beyond the systems that control us and avoid the self-destructiveness invited by the corrupting nature of man.

Balancing You and the Image of You

Being an AEM major, I’ve been hammered with various interview tips that are presented as methods to help you “Ace the Interview”.

“Script stories that tell your strengths”, “Always look them in the eye”, “Make your weakness genuine, insightful, and then back it up with how you are working on your weakness”, “Separate yourself”, “Everything in your stories and experiences should connect back to why you want to work here, why you can contribute to the team, and why they should pick you”. These are just some of the various tips that I heard.

While these tips do make sense and are extremely helpful, I can’t keep myself from asking at what point do you stop being your best self and start to be a person you are not to get the job you think you want? At what point does “fake it till you make it” start to hurt you? What percentage of people force themselves into something only to be miserable working day to day? While we focus a lot of attention on performing well on interviews, we hardly ever hear about the fit and happiness of those who receive the jobs after. I am curious if there is a difference in interview experiences between the people who are happy and people who are unsatisfied with their current occupation.

That being said, I am also wondering about the effectiveness of interviews. At some point I feel like it may become similar to that of standardized testing needed to be admitted into college. Ultimately it may depend on whether a person is a good public speaker, well practiced, have the talent at talking to a semi-stranger, and is good at promoting themselves. While some of these qualities are necessary on the job, some may not be. In fact, skills that may be needed are often hard to detect. I wonder if there are certain types of interviews that are more effective compared to others.

I guess ultimately the best thought to keep in mind is something that Sarah brought up – remember to be yourself and that you are interviewing them too. Try to be the best version of you while still being you.

Thoughts on Brazil

Last Wednesday I participated in Rose Cafe with Andre Simores on the topic of Brazil. Simores touched topics range from geography, culture, to governance. It was interesting to me when he mentioned some of the differences between the U.S. and Brazil. In Brazil, although the universities are free, one needs to have good grades to get into those universities; and public high schools are not good enough. In other words, in order to get college education, one needs to have the financial resources to enroll in a private high school. This is very different, as in the U.S., to some extend, one needs to have financial resources to get quality education in both high school and universities. It was also interesting that for Brazilians, the most important meal of the day is lunch, when they will have rice with bean, and steak; whereas here, we have more food options at dinner. In addition, Simores also discussed the political environment in Brazil and it seems like Brazil is on the path to become more democratic country.

To be honest, I did not have much knowledge about Brazil other than key words like rain forests, soccer, Rio de Janeiro, and the Olympic Game. I wonder why my knowledge about the country, which has the fifth largest population, is so limited; meanwhile I know a lot more about developed countries, even those I have never visited. I tried to recall the textbooks I read and I don’t remember learning about Brazil in world history. The only detailed discussion on Brazil I encountered before was in the Global Cities class I took last year here in Cornell, when I had a reading talking about the aftermath of the 2016 Olympics.  I realized that there are only selected countries with significant political and economic impacts being featured in textbooks; and Brazil with the fifth largest population in the world, is not included. Therefore, it is the power dynamics behind the decision to include certain countries into the discussion of world history and to ignore others that results in my limited knowledge. And all I could do now is to make up the missing knowledge through other sources.

Flash from the Past

Comedy has definitely changed in the past 84 years.  It is difficult to put something like Duck Soup in the same category as any of The Hangover’s or Superbad.  And that’s not to say it’s any better or any worse, but one noticeable difference between the weathered comedy I saw at Cornell Cinema and many of the newer comedies I’ve seen is tempo.  In one of the first scenes of Duck Soup, as soon as Groucho Marx makes his way on screen, he proceeds in a rapid fire of witticisms, many of which are direct insults.  It seemed like the main feature of the comedy was the comedy itself and that the movie’s plot had been built around that fact.  In contrast, I view a lot of modern funny movies as movies that have comedy built into them.  The funny things said and the funny actions performed go with the flow.  Groucho, and later Harpo and Chico, lead the movie with their antics.

Something comedy often does, true in the past and today, is make fun of controversy/ sensitive topics.  It did seem that Duck Soup had its fair share of comments/jokes directed at women.  I appreciate when humor occasionally borders along the edges of inappropriate to make a point.  For example, a comedian may make light of his own personal struggle with drug addiction.  He can still ultimately give the audience a new perspective on what it’s like to be addicted to drugs all the while making them laugh due to how the subject matter has been delivered.  I did not feel the Duck Soup jokes directed at gender, and some I believe at race, had reoriented my views or given me any additional insight.  I do not think they were maliciously placed necessarily, but are instead from a time where they might be viewed as commonplace and therefore viewed as acceptable.  I do think it’s important to still be able to make fun of serious situations, especially in a world that, as a general trend, is increasing its politically correctness.  But at the same time, there’s is a difference between something novel that may rub you the wrong way, and something hackneyed that seems more a cheap source of laughs, especially when it is viewed as offensive by a certain group of people.

Duck Soup did have its funny moments.  Even though some of the other humor used was classic gag humor commonly used in old cartoons, it still seems funny because of its innocence.  Some things simply don’t take a very deep level of thought and are able to evoke what seems like a more natural, unabashed laugh out of the audience.  All around, I recommend seeing the film as it can offer laughter, while still giving the viewer at least a small window through which to view 1933 in America.

On Brazil, its biomes, and its school systems

I was particularly intrigued with Brazil and its history and culture after watching City of God a few weeks ago during one of Flora’s Friday Films, and it was to my pleasure that Professor Andre Simores, an animal science and economics professor at the Mato Grosso do Sul State University, came to speak at last week’s Rose Cafe about just that.

As an equatorial country, Brazil is known to be hot and humid; however, because the country is so large, there are many varying ecosystems within Brazil. Professor Simores elaborated more about the different climates in these various ecosystems. He spoke about the Cerrado, a tropical savannah region, the Pampas, which are fertile lowlands, the Pantanal, which are wetlands, the Amazonia, the rainforest region, and Caatinga, the drylands.

He also spoke about some interesting cultural differences between Brazil and the U.S. One topic that intrigued me was the Brazilian school system. Brazil has tuition-free public universities, which is amazing to a U.S. private-goer myself. However, the good high schools are private, and you must go to a good high school in order to get into a good college. This is the reverse of the U.S., where many of the high schools are public, but you must pay tuition to go to a private college. It makes me wonder what the pros and repercussions of each system are. Perhaps the American system is set up so we have more room for error–if we fool around when we are younger, this doesn’t stop us from going to a decent college However, it seems like Brazilians have a lot more to lose if they don’t get into a good high school.

It was interesting to hear about cultural differences such as this one at the talk last Wednesday–I am sure there are countless more. I wish Professor Simores the best during his stay here in the U.S., and I hope he enjoys living here on Cornell’s lovely campus.

Brasil Ecosystems

At last week’s Rose Cafe, Andres Simores and his wife joined us to speak about their country, Brazil. Before this Rose Cafe, I had only heard of Brazil in the context of Rio Olympic Games and occasionally the Zika virus. I imagined Brazil’s main ecosystem to be a rainforest.

Andre showed us images of the many different types of ecosystems in Brazil. These ranged from salt marshes, the rainforest and even more desert like environments.

Andre also spoke about the education system at Brazil and how public universities there differ from the universities here. Him and his wife also explained the difficult political situation in the country.

All in all it was a great talk and it definitely moved Brazil up on my list of countries to visit.

An insight into Brazil

From the last Rose Cafe, our speaker Andre Simores is a Ph.D. in Applied Economics and a Professor in his home country.  He spent his time allowing us to experience the beauty of Brazil’s landscape and gave us an insight into Brazilian culture.

Brazil is the fifth largest country behind China, the United States, Canada, and Russia. They use Celsius degrees and the metric system. He mentioned that the weather outside that day was about 10 degrees Celsius.  He explained what were appropriate dishes for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. For breakfast, people ate bread and fruit, while drinking milk.  For lunch, they had a dish that included rice, bean paste, meat, and veggies.  For dinner, they ate a sandwich. People usually worked from 8-12, have a two-hour lunch break, and then continued to work from 2-6. The capital is Brazilia. He showed us pictures of other cities in Brazil and gave brief descriptions of the agriculture that make them unique from one another.

Pantanal is known for its breed of horses that can eat grass from the bottom of water which means that they have adapted to wetlands Pampas is a  flat area that has very productive soil. Amazonia has a dense rainforest. Cerrado has small trees. Caatinga is the poorest area in terms of agriculture it seems to represent a desert, water from the rivers are used to grow agriculture there.

 

Wait, so Brazil isn’t just Rio and then the Amazon?

I really enjoy Rose Cafes where I get to hear about another country from somebody who is from there because they always debunk misconceptions I have about said country. The biggest one for me with this one was the ecological diversity of Brazil. I knew that Brazil was a very large country, but I still somehow assumed that most of it was tropical rainforest? I don’t know why either, so don’t ask. The point is it was cool to hear Andre Simores talk about his work in different areas of Brazil and show pictures of said areas that were very different from the Brazil I had in my mind before the event.

It was also cool to hear him talk about the difference between colleges and universities in the US versus Brazil. I thought it was interesting that for Brazilian students, public universities are the top tier universities, but a large number of said students went to private high schools. It seems to be the reverse of what it is in the US, where most high schoolers attend public universities but there is a conception that private universities are better than public universities. I also thought it was interesting that the implications of this mean that as more private high school students fill up spots in the free public universities, students from public high schools who may have a harder time affording tuition have a hard time getting into the free public universities. Simores also made it sound like most students don’t live in university housing.

All in all, it was cool to hear about Brazil and Brazilian colleges from someone who lives there because it brings a perspective I had never heard before.

Some (mixed) thoughts on cities and stars

Having been left at the station by the La La Land hype train, I was excited to be able to see it at Cornell Cinema with Rose House. It had come highly recommended to me personally, so even though I was aware of some of the criticisms it had garnered, I was fully expecting to thoroughly enjoy it. And I did! Sort of. I think. Maybe.

I’ll start with the easy stuff because I am clearly still unable to speak about this movie coherently. La La Land is visually stunning. The cinematography was really cool (the opening scene with the camera moving through the cars on the highway stands out) and the colors were beautiful. To me, the use of color really added to the whole romanticized and fantastical mood of the film. Additionally, it was really cool to see the traditional Hollywood musical style of movie applied to a contemporary setting. I think the film did a really good job of staying true to that old Hollywood style, but bringing it into a more modern era. In my find, the whole film is about the dangers of romanticization, so placing the film in that colorful, shiny, old Hollywood setting really speaks to the themes of the film.

The tricky part for me is the plot and the characters. For most of the film, I remember thinking “Wow, I am really not enjoying this as much as I think I should and I can’t pinpoint exactly why.” I’ve had quite a lot of time to think about it, including a chat about it over lunch with one of my friends back home who I consider the biggest movie person I know, and I still can’t pinpoint exactly why. For starters, I think the plot wasn’t anything new or exceptional. The whole young, broke idealists trying to make their dreams come true in a big city trope didn’t shock or amaze me. It wasn’t bad, I just didn’t think it was groundbreaking. And I didn’t really like the characters. I don’t think you were necessarily supposed to like them, but I do think you were supposed to at least find them interesting, which I didn’t. And not just because Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone’s singing was strictly passable (although that’s a pretty big movie musical pet peeve of mine. Like, go for the trained vocalists not the big name actors please). I don’t know, something about the characters just didn’t captivate me.

I was talking to my friend about the ending, and we both agreed that it was kind of weird that they both seemed to get everything they wanted at the end. He thought it was even weirder that they got everything EXCEPT each other, but that point actually redeemed a lot of the movie for me. The whole scene at the end where Mia and her husband end up in Sebastian’s successful jazz club and we see the crazy love montage of Mia and Sebastian moving through movie sets of the story as if they had stayed together and ended up just as successful really was the best part in my opinion. Because the whole scene is so romanticized and fantastical that you realize that the reality where Mia and Sebastian could have had it all and had each other is just that, romantic and fantastical. And the smile they exchange at the very end lets the audience know that they know that too. The fact is that they could only pursue their career dreams when they were NOT together. Take that as you will, but to me that really cemented the movie in my mind and is what made me finally come to the conclusion that yes, I liked La La Land.

Brazil: A Fascinating Nation

Last Wednesday I attended the Rose Café lecture on Brazil with Andre Rozemberg Peixoto Simoes, a doctorate student at Federal University of Vicosa studying modern economy and society. Mr. Simoes’ talk was interesting. I knew Brazil was one of the most populated countries in the world, but I didn’t realize it was the fifth largest country in the world. I was also surprised to learn that Brazil has many diverse environments including a vast wetland known as the Pantanal which is home to some of the world’s most unusual flora and animals. Brazil’s Northeast region is one of the poorest regions in the country. I was surprised to learn that this area also has a lot of dry land and boasts some of the most beautiful beaches and resort areas including the Praia da Barra da Tijuca near Rio de Janeiro. This helps the economy because it boosts tourism, but the area is still home to many of Brazil’s poorest residents. This is just one example of the wide gap between Brazil’s rich and poor that has plagued Brazil in the last decade. It was interesting to learn that one of the reasons for this gap is because Brazil has only been a democracy since 1985. Since democracy took hold in Brazil, its government has had two impeachments which have led to corruption and economic hardship. Mr. Simoes’ research focuses on another economic problem, the fluctuating price of milk. It was interesting to learn that the price of milk is not controlled by Brazil’s government as it is in the United States. Instead, if too much milk is produced, the price drops dramatically and farmers starve. Mr. Simoes suggested that in order to boost the economy, the government should make it easier for more people to get an education. I did not realize that a college education in Brazil is actually free, but only wealthy students can afford to take the necessary classes and tests to gain admission. Overall, I found the lecture very interesting because I have never travelled to Brazil so it was exciting to see pictures of the beautiful country and learn so much about it. My favorite pictures were of the Amazon Rainforest. One day, I would like to see it in person and see if the pictures do it justice.

Fake News for a New World

Last Monday, I attended the table talk about fake news. I thought it really opened my eyes to the responsibilities of regular consumers of news. When people share fake news, it gains attention and more people believe the news that isn’t true. Although the problem of fake news gained national attention with the presidential election last year, it is not really new. People have always created stories to trick consumers of news into believing false things about one person or another.

During the talk, GRF Magdala focused our attention on solutions to this problem. We spoke about checking sources, reading carefully, and only subscribing to reputable sources like the New York Times. We also spoke about how difficult it was to find the time to source-check every piece of news we read. I learned about the detriment it was to serious journalism. I think that everyone has a responsibility to decrease the amount of fake news we read and give attention to.

Not only does fake news cause people to believe things that aren’t true, it also has the potential to cause accidents. When people believe that someone is in danger as a result of fake news, they can behave in a way that is dangerous to others. We also discussed whether people should be prosecuted for such crimes. I think that fake news brings new questions and demands on society. These questions are indicative of a fast changing technologically inclined world that needs to adapt.

The Beauty of Brazil

This past Wednesday I attended the Rose Cafe and heard Andre Simores discuss Brazil’s culture and natural landscape. I have never traveled outside of the US or Canada, so I found this to be very interesting. Hearing Andre discuss his country was very intriguing. He pulled up pictures to show us what the different areas of Brazil looked like. These pictures varied from dense rain forests to desert like regions. I had no idea that Brazil had an environment with such a high amount of variation. It was also interesting to hear about the school systems and how the public colleges are the most prestigious. This is the opposite of what is true in the US. Andre explained that those who make it into the public universities mostly come from private schools. So even though University is free, it is mostly the wealthy that go to the public universities. This was an interesting concept to me. This limits higher education to only those that can afford a private school tuition.

Overall, I found this talk to be very interesting. It was nice to learn about another culture and their perspectives on certain things such as education.

Parallels in Gattaca

Though Gattaca is a science-fiction film which shows a dystopian society where humans are born to be the genetically best they can be, the society in Gattaca bears a lot of resemblance to our own. The idea of being born into your DNA is accepted to different extents for each person, and science has shown the effects of nature and nurture coming together to change outcomes. Even though this genetic predetermination is accepted, our society, like that in Gattaca, is widely stratified based on the circumstances a person is born into. The notion of inequality is very much stable and unchanging.

The society in Gattaca emphasizes the genetic makeup of the individual, but the film shows the power of the individual beyond his DNA. Gattaca conveyed the importance and self-determination of identity in a protagonist who rises above what his genetic makeup destines to create his own life. In this same sense, our society values the underdog who is able to rise above circumstances to success. Overall, Vincent’s perseverance left a hopeful message, inspiring us all to look past our flaws and believe in our ability to succeed.

Feedback loop into immortality

First off, the movie GATTACA was, by my standards average. Though it seemed hackneyed at times, and the acting seemed, as many have said before, “low-energy,” the premise was intriguing enough for me to keep wanting to watch the movie, all the way to the bitter, abrupt end.

I did not realize the impact the movie had on me, however, until I got launched into a debate with my friend over a text chat. I had mentioned that this selective genetic process could lead to self-augmentation, and, as an incurable cynic, I only foresaw disaster from this.

I believed that if people were able to make their offspring smarter, then this would incur a positive feedback loop (Oh boy, I do love me my positive feedback loops). People would begin to focus singularly on the pursuit of becoming smarter. Each generation would become an improvement on the previous, but, ever curious, we would continue to wonder what lay beyond our (enhanced) realm of understanding. Thus, we would focus on improving our intellect, perhaps obsessively. This stems from the assumption that people aren’t satisfied with knowing enough; people are only satisfied once they know everything. To know everything, of course, is impossible.

As people get smarter, then issues start to arise. People become suspicious of the unknown, and it is impossible to predict what a smarter person might do. Those who remain unaugmented in any way could become oppressed without even knowing it. Who knows what humanity might have to sacrifice in this ultimately obsessive pursuit of infinite intellect?

The transcendentalist counterargument is that it is better for humanity to expand our boundaries for the betterment of our race. What stars could we explore with augmented minds? What discoveries could we uncover, what breakthroughs could we achieve?

I don’t buy it. Maybe I’m just far to skeptical to believe it. But I do know that almost any resource-consuming positive feedback loop is destructive. If this is the way that humanity is going, well, I am most certainly quite worried.

The Murderous Desert

Upon first glance, there is not much to be said about Max Max: Beyond Thunderdome. It is the third in the series, and the second one to feature the titular character, Mad Max, surviving in the hostile, barely-hospitable Australian wasteland. There seems to be no innovation here: only a continuation of the previous movies’ breakthroughs.

And yet, it has received critical acclaim, immortalized by a cult following. Though it isn’t the first of the Mad Max series featured in this post-apocalyptic realm, it is the first to contain a semblance of civilization in the blasted wasteland.

Bartertown: a cluster of ramshackle hovels, which could hardly be considered a town. However there still remains a semblance of order. Their denizens stay not only because the deserts outside of Bartertown are riddled with raiders and sinkholes, but also because of their sacrosanct “law”:

“Two men enter. One man leaves.”

Mad Max: Beyond Thunderdome may seem samey or corny to us, but for its time, it was definitely a new take on cinema. Though Westerns had been in decline, a simple change of setting proved to be wildly successful. Instead of cars, cowboys ride cars and buggies; instead of tyrannical sheriffs or bold vigilantes, we have Auntie, Master, and Mad Max himself. Instead of mysterious and hostile Indians, we have the tribal coven of children from the crashed 747 flight. Yet, one key theme remains the same. Though the denizens of Mad Max seem to be struggling to survive, they are in reality struggling to maintain their humanity in the face of an overwhelmingly brutal landscape, one which is hell-bent on destroying the sanity of man.

Different people in the movie have different ways to accomplish that. The children cling to their belief in their exodus to civilization. Auntie thirsts for power over Bartertown.  Yet, Max only clings to his humanity by upholding a sense of right, one which had been engrained into him from his days as a policeman. He was a guardian before the world ended, and he still clings to that need to protect the weak.

Any conflicts the characters may have had between each other were due to their motivations, which were spurred by the burgeoning world around them.

Building Better Humans

Gattaca provides a necessary inspection into a problem that we will eventually have to face, which is the decision to apply genetic modifications to humans. The arguments against revolve around the consequences if we “tamper” with nature and the arguments in support tend to focus on the “perfect” human. The extremes are irreconcilable, but it is obvious that if we look at specific points of both sides there will be some middle ground resulting in minor modifications to the humane gene.

While speaking with two students who were vastly more informed on the subject than I was, I got a good grasp of the full range of concerns of the opposition. For one, there’s the fear of another Nazi-esque eugenics movement, which is rooted in the reasonable concern over who decides what gene mutations are superior. Whoever this arbiter figure would be decides the fate of human evolution. Doubtless, there would be backlash over every decision stemming from each protester’s sense of what needs to be preserved in the gene pool. This is without taking into the account the more spiritual side of tampering with nature, as in some sense we’ve already done a good deal of this with the more spiritual disputants unknowingly enjoying the reaped benefits and human modifications would only serve to benefit everyone if done correctly. Done correctly is the second point of contention, as it implies avoiding all the frightening eugenics and focuses on improving human intelligence and physical capability, but avoids how to account for the unknown. I’m unprepared to argue against this point as I was oblivious to the fact that, at this moment there apparently already exists differences in blood types that may be considered unfit, but help survival rates in Africa against disease. How to plan and foresee what changes to the work nature has carefully handcrafted over millennia would likely become a huge topic of study. The third point, which I find a little less troublesome if strong privacy ethics are upheld or enough generations take up genetic modifications, is the fear of social genetic stratification. That is to say, some people’s genes are better because they have more of X and Y or a person is inferior for a position because they carry the Z gene. All points carry merit, but they all have solutions, however difficult these may be to apply.

If Genetically Modified Humans were to come into existence, I believe much of the rational concerns from the opposition could be quelled by judicious application of the technology. Assuming we only focus on what I imagine are shared “absolute qualities” by all societies, such as increased intelligence and genetic health of muscle and other tissue. These qualities are things that the GMH’s could decide to fully utilize or not, meaning no one forces a more physically capable human to run more or the more intelligent people to study. Addressing the opposition point of who decides the measure for intelligence, I mean in the sense of absolute intelligence such as faster chemical neuron signals and better memory which has served to benefit, as far as I’m aware, every human and past civilization. As for capability to understand abstract ideas and an appreciation for art, I believe those are subjective and modification should be avoided. I am no geneticist and I have no clue how one would pinpoint these beneficial modifications, but as a thought experiment to say if we ever could, if the route taken was highly cautious of past human-failures, I do not see a viable argument for purposely halting progress towards building a better human.

While this may all be easy to say, it is likely near impossible to perfectly apply this system and man will inevitably lapse back to repeat some atrocity from history, but maybe a modified human wouldn’t.

Despair in the City of God

While watching City of God, I was overcome with the feeling of hopelessness of life that the less fortunate might bare. Beyond just the conditions that residents endure in a favela, Brazilian slums where gangsters and drugs define the social order, the actions of nearly all the characters did not contribute to progress in their own life or impact in the lives of others and seemed ultimately meaningless. Perhaps it’s the fact that the story crosses multiple generations stretching back to the 60’s, which has given time the opportunity to erode the memories of the events and our ability to sense their impact. Or it could be that stories that unfold on another continent don’t easily find their way into the lives of others. The cycle of power and content of Brazilian authorities served to compound these issues as I felt the film gave an oddly nihilistic impression concerning the lives of the poor in a land without law.

One big way the movie conveys the low regard for life in the favela is the amount of death portrayed in the film. During the turf war, countless numbers of gangsters from both factions are murdered as the film jumps from scene to scene of the bloody dispute. While the life of a gangster who terrorized the town and took part in murders might seem less important, the span of time covered by the film allows viewers to watch the transformation of children to mobsters. Since youth, these children dream of owning a gun and being a successful gangster, perfectly demonstrating how dreams or even hopes of greater accomplishments are non-existent in the favela. The most blatant show of disrespect for the value of life comes from Li’l Z, a pathological killer who revels in the stardom of being the most powerful boss. As a child, L’il Z is capable of killing tourist, friends, and children. He plays games with the lives of children who have never brought him harm and feels obligated to return to the house of a man whose wife he killed in order to finish the husband as well. As he is arguably the centerpiece of the movie, Li’l Z’s brutal actions perhaps reveals the indifference the film has regarding life.

Though death may be common in the favela, there is still a chance to make a change with one’s short, hard life, but as City of God shows, residents are trapped and even lured into playing the cycle of power inherent in slums. Even if the countless gangsters avoided a turf war and Li’l Z’s propensity for killing was quelled, the residents of the town follow the same cycle across all three generations. There will be a younger generation who overthrow the old in order to build a brief empire of drugs and weapons, only to be toppled by a more ruthless youth. With the exception of Rocket, a reporter who narrates the repeating generational struggle, every child from the favela followed this cycle while never bringing any change or aspiring to be something above the unfortunate life they were born into. Again the film hints that the lives of children in the favela are doomed to be inconsequential and live out the unchanging cycle.

To the outside world, whether the residents of the favela were alive or dead seems to have no impact, reinforcing the mood of nihilism. The journey of the characters would only live on in print of forgotten newspaper headlines or the single memory of Rocket. It’s less a concern of whether the events actually occurred, it’s about the fact the events could very well have occurred and life would carry on for everyone else as if they never happened. To live a life where no impact was made, even towards improving the system you were unfortunately born into, is a tragedy.

A view of Brasil

Last weeks rose cafe included a discussion about some of the sites and interesting facts of Brazil. House guest Andre Simores was an interesting hour where he discussed many simple facts about brazil ranging from education standards to places to visit. I personally don’t know much about Brazil. As a Bolivian woman, I go to South America quite often to visit family and friends. While I have accustomed myself with most of South America, Brazil still seems like a foreign land to me. I have never been to Brazil and the presence of Portuguese seems a daunting barrier. I have heard about the highs and lows of Brazil, from the amazing tourist opportunities such as the beaches, landmarks, and cities, but also the lows such as high rates of poverty and crime. We had also discussed the difference in education between Brazil and the United States. Simores discussed that the two countries were similar in types of higher education, and that public universities in Brazil were some of the best universities offered. But difference arose in primary and secondary school, where the public system was viewed as lacking. If families could afford it, they would try by any means to send their children to a private school. Going to a private school for primary and secondary school was one of the best ways to ensure a child would be able to attend a good university. These are very interesting disparities between the two countries Brazil is an interesting place I would definitely want to visit and hopefully will be able to at some point in time.

Bird, Bird, Bird, Bird is the Word

Before this past weekend, I had no idea bird watching could be so fun and rewarding! Along with GRF, Ty, and a fellow Rose Scholar, I visited Cornell’s renowned Lab of Ornithology. However, to be honest, my favorite part of this event was the bird watching prior to the tour of the lab. I think one of the most valuable lessons gained from the day was to pay attention to your surroundings. I mean, think about. Most of us wake up every morning and walk to class without even knowing what animals, particularly birds, we are surrounded by! Birds are so diverse in sound and personality; they’re definitely more than just a pretty tune in the morning.

So here’s a few things I learned that might help you be a bit more aware of your surroundings. Hopefully this encourages you to stop by the lab or take a walking bird watch tour at some point during your Cornell experience!

As a beginner, you might find it logical to try and memorize different birds by the way they look; however, it would actually be easier to remember the way a bird acts and what they sound like before attempting to remember what different birds look like. The reasons behind this are that birds can be difficult to differentiate. Also, depending on where you are and the weather, you’ll rarely ever get a perfect view of a bird. A lot of the time you won’t even get to see the color on the bird, only shades and shape. Also, if you’re able to identify birds by their sounds, your life becomes a lot easier because once you hear a bird, then you can focus on looking for it (instead of looking for a bird without being able to identify the sound).

What I found most interesting was learning how to identify birds based on their behavior. For example, the American Robin tends to spend its time on ground, with bunny like hops. This is characteristic of many birds in the thrush category. Or take for example, the finch (forgive me I don’t remember exactly what type of finch) tends to hang out in groups high up at the tip of trees. They’re so chatty! They almost sound like they’re gossiping amongst themselves. Chick-a-dees literally make the sound “chick a dee dee dee”. They’re cute little fellows that are always curious and willing to get  little closer to see what’s going on, especially when humans walk by. Blue jays are characterized by bully-like behavior and their chirp is a bit harsher than any of the other bird previously mentioned.

I know this sounds like it’s a lot to memorize, but I promise it’s so much fun! Once you see the birds for yourself, you’ll see how unique their personalities can be. It’s also really rewarding once you’re able to remember what a bird sounds/looks like and how it behaves. Now I can show off some of bird identification skills with some of my friends.

Following the walk, we got a tour of the lab. This was my first visit, and I definitely plan on going back to cover the whole lab. The tour offered a more biological and historical perspective of birds and background on the creation of the lab and what it holds. Below I have attached pictures of some pretty fancy birds, however, the lab is not limited to just these figures. I highly recommend stopping by to see the vast amounts of information the lab holds. Bird definitely is the word!

 

A little bit about Brasil

This past Wednesday evening, I listened to a talk by Professor Andre Simores from Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. We started out learning about the geography of Brazil. I never realized how large and expansive the country is. We also discussed recent political events, important cities, and the olympics.

One of the main topics of discussion was the high inequality levels. This is to say that there is an unequal distribution of wealth within the country. I am currently in a class in which we systematically try to understand the causes of inequality, how to measure it, and concrete policy approaches that can remedy the conditions resulting from a high level of inequality. One thing that we learned is that political instability and corruption can stunt a country’s potential for economic growth. This is because an inability to have faith in institutions means that investors will not take risks and the country will not be able to progress into the process of industrialization.

Another important factor in economic growth is access to education. We learned from Professor Simores that it is often the wealthy who have access to advanced public universities. Since they are able to attend the best private schools, these individuals are able to attend the best public universities after graduation. As a result of the barriers to access into higher education, many stay in the cycle of poverty.

I realized by taking my course, and while listening to this talk that inequality is a highly complex topic to attempt to attack. There is no one prescription for attempting to resolve the issues that arise. It is important to understand that there are hundreds of different ways to solve complex problems like these and no one policy can solve all the issues attached to economic inequality.

 

Brazil: A Diverse Country

I went to a Rose Cafe last Wednesday where we learned more about Brazil. The speaker spoke about the diverse climate in Brazil, from beaches to wetlands. This really surprised me because I thought that the majority of Brazil was rainforest. The speaker also talked about how the president recently got impeached, and that when I realized that I really did not know much about Brazil. It’s one of the biggest countries in the world, so it was a bit startling to realize how little I knew about it. I remember very briefly going over South America in 9th grade, but we spent 2 weeks talking about the entire continent. And now in college, as a science major, there really wasn’t any reason to take a class about South America or Brazil. It can be hard to teach students everything about the world, and the education system has to pick which pieces of information to cut. I really enjoyed going to this talk because I learned a little bit more about life in Brazil. I appreciate these Rose Cafes because I get to learn some things about the world that I wouldn’t have know otherwise.

High expectations

Like many of the Rose Scholars in the group, I had not seen La La Land yet. In fact, I am so behind on new movies, or really most movies, that I didn’t actually know anything about it other than a little bit of what happened at the Oscars and that it was a musical. I guess I never realized how many covers of its songs I’ve heard in other places, but the music was familiar, which may have actually worsened my experience watching it for the first time. Personally, I don’t really understand all of the praise it has received, but I also know my movie tastes tend to be misaligned from a lot of popular opinions.
From the hype that it’s gotten and the positive expectations going into the movie along with the fact that I enjoy musical movies, I didn’t enjoy this movie as much as I thought I would. Maybe if I saw if again it would grow on me, but it seemed a little too contrived and cheesy. I understand fading the background and having a spotlight on an emotional soloist in a theater production, but I was slightly annoyed every time it happened in this particular movie. Unlike a live production, there are so many more interesting things you can do with a scene and camera angles that aren’t zooming into a face with a dark background. I think with a clearly large budget and the fact that it is a movie could have resulted in some better cinematographic choices.
I don’t want to make this post into a rant about why I didn’t enjoy the movie, because that’s not really the case. I enjoyed the movie bits much more than the musical bits, which I think was my main issue. I understand casting big-name stars, but I wasn’t on board with all the artistic choices. The singing wasn’t as strong as I expected, especially coming in after watching fantastic renditions of the songs elsewhere. Perhaps the vocal tones the producers were going for were met, but I think was expecting a more musical-theater-sounding quality to the voices. Another thing that was distracting was arms. Or maybe just the dancing in general. While there were some great scenes where I thought they took good advantage of the fact that they were shooting a movie and not a stage production, it was pretty obvious who wasn’t trained as a dancer. In some ways, the movie even recognized this, like with the cheesy silhouettes in the observatory and the very boringly shot tap scene.
While I enjoyed the acting for the most part, I don’t really enjoy watching an established actor pretend to be a struggling actor who keeps auditioning and finally gets their chance. I get that this may have been their dream in the past, but at this point, if Emma Stone were less likeable, I would have been very irritated watching her bad auditions. Also, why was Ryan Gosling the only white person who liked jazz in the movie? There are definitely things that musicals can get away with, but I wasn’t enamored with the overall movie to overlook smaller parts.
Overall, the movie didn’t meet expectations, but I still had an enjoyable time watching it. There were definitely parts where I laughed and definitely appreciated some of the artistic choices made, but this I don’t think this is ever going to be a favorite movie musical for me. I think it tried to mix elements of movies and musicals in different ways, but not always cohesively. While I would definitely give it another shot and will probably watch it again sometime in the future, I can’t really pinpoint my current feelings on the production.

La La Land is artistic gold

Though I really enjoyed the plot and songs of La La Land, what fascinated me the most was the overall layered artistic composition of the whole film. At first glance, the movie seems to have a typical and digestible front. The story-line is simple: boy and girl meet and fall in love. The main characters are simple: girl wants to be an actress, boy wants to be a jazz musician. The color scheme was focused around the 3 primary colors: red, yellow, blue. The songs are fun and catchy, the scenery is bright and everything is really sweet and perfect like a typical rom-com musical would be.  However, this seemingly simple base is what allows for the director, the artist, to attract audiences to what looks like will be a fun and enticing dream-like experience, while setting the foundation to create something much more complex.

To start, the movie seems to be set in two worlds–one in which there is real life, and one which is a fantasy of real life. Being a musical, random cuts to perfectly choreographed song and dance all seem to happen in the dream-like part of the reality, when moments are happiest and seem so perfect and happy or exciting that they almost couldn’t be real (think: “pinch me I must be dreaming” kind of effect). In contrast, the parts of the movie in which conflict or less-amicable feelings arise are usually more quiet, almost no music in the background. In addition they happen more often through the “winter” and “fall” chapters of the film (identifiers which seem to represent emotional seasons, not just natural ones).

The music and the colors in the film all help to set different moods in less obvious ways that also seem to sway the audience in more subtle ways–kind of like experiencing a feeling in a dream, where you can’t necessarily pinpoint your feelings because you do not have total control over what might happen next. La La Land really does a great job of artistically composing the film to create a brilliant effect on the plot and the audiences.

drango, the d is silent

To be honest, I thought this movie was weird. I came away with this impression likely from a combination of not having seen the prequels (apparently, this Mad Max was third in the original series) and not being able to discern the dialogue at times. However, I appreciated some parts.

I don’t think I could contribute any meaningful comments on the plot or its role in the series as a whole, so I’ll discuss what I thought about the aesthetic of the movie. As I was watching it, I was reminded of ‘Rango’, the 2011 western-esque animation starring Jack Sparrow as a chameleon. Back when I first saw it, I absolutely enjoyed it, maybe partly because I was going through a spaghetti-western phase at the time. A distinct memory I have is the discussion about the movie with a close friend. For him, he said he hated the movie because it was ‘ugly’. I argued that it was an intentional ugliness that was central to the movie’s identity, as the movie wouldn’t be as effective with ‘Finding Nemo’ textures and palettes. Anyhow, I was reminded of his point throughout the Bartertown scenes in ‘Beyond Thunderdome’, as everything about the town was ugly. It felt stifling at times, and although this was definitely intentional, I can understand how my friend might have felt when he watched ‘Rango’. Although, the rusty steampunk (?) look of the vehicles in the chase scenes towards the end of ‘Beyond Thunderdome’ was pretty great, and I can see why they stuck with that look in the most recent Mad Max film (I haven’t seen it, but similar chase scenes with similar vehicles were shown in the trailers for it).

Now that I think about it, ‘Beyond Thunderdome’ and ‘Rango’ share a theme: an outsider shows up in some established community, he’s mistaken for someone else, he’s expected to save the day, he disappoints everyone, and then he ends up saving the day. Interesting~

Brazil & Football: National Unity in a Heterogeneous Country

This past Wednesday, Andre Rozemberg Prixoto Simores, a professor at Mato Grosso do Sul State University, spoke to us students about his native country of Brazil. Simores touched on his nation’s culture, agricultural practices, geographical regions, and socioeconomic situation. In this amalgam of topics, I found Brazil’s obsession with soccer, or, football as it is called there, to be the most interesting. Simores explained to us that football is a HUGE deal in Brazil. I actually knew this beforehand, as I have read that soccer game days are considered national holidays there, whilst sometimes the deceased get a soccer team flag draped over their coffins.

I can’t speak to why Brazil cares so much more about football than America does. But I can understand why football is so important to Brazil as a country. Simores mentioned that that the gap between rich and poor in Brazil is of great magnitude. In addition to socioeconomic disparities, Brazil contains geographically dissimilar regions. It comprises rainforests, wetlands, savannahs, and plains, and intersperses booming cities with sparse rural areas. Therefore, overall, Brazil contains a variety of diverse peoples having different geographic and socioeconomic experiences. Football is the shared experience that strings together this population of disparate folks. It is how national unity is achieved.

Therefore, football is more than just a sport in Brazil. It is the common language, breaking through geographical and social class boundaries. What fills this role in America? Sports? Politics? This is an important question to ponder if we want to improve cohesiveness and unity across the US.

 

Our current world

The movie Mad Max was one of the most interesting movies I have watched thus far in the Flora’s Film collection. One of the main points of the movie was to acknowledge the presence of technology in our lives. The children were stranded on the island. They wanted to go back to the civilized world with technology and modern devices. Technology has made our lives easier by making information more accessible. Sometimes we take our access to technology such as personal computers and smartphones granted. We do not realize the tremendous importance it has in our lives. In addition, there was no religion in Mad Max, although there were a set of principles people seem to follow. People followed a “leader.” Similarly to God, the leader was someone who people laid expectations on. Overall, I think the movie was decent.

La La Land The Land of the Unrealistic

It is rare to see musicals today; after all this movie was made in 2016 and not the 1950’s. But there is one thing music and musicals do to us: they cheer us up. I watched La La Land for the first time last Sunday.

The film’s backdrop is in LA, so maybe it is more appropriate to write the title as LA LA Land. I also checked the definition of “la la land”: “Los Angeles or Hollywood, especially with regard to the lifestyle and attitudes of those living there or associated with it.” I never knew that … I knew the gist of what the phrase means, as described by its second meaning: “a fanciful state or dreamworld.”

The movie opens with a traffic jam, which is a sure way to bring the worst out in people. But this is a musical, so folks end up breaking into dance and song. And there is a sense of a place where everything is magical and dreams come true. Of course no musical is complete without a girl meets boy storyline … we meet Mia and Sebastian. She is a struggling actress, and he is a musician who aspires to open a jazz club. Certainly his ambitions are more nostalgic since there are probably few people who aspire to be jazz artists these days. But it is that nostalgia for a romantic time of the musicals that is embodied here. And the chasing of your dreams. The ending (five years later in movie time) was interesting. Mia is a famous actress, married with a daughter. She stumbles into a Jazz club that Sebastian has opened (so he also got to his dream). And the two of them are left imagining how things may have gone if their relationship had worked out.

There is one interesting line from Sebastian that striked me as interesting, more describing our lives and a hopeful view of the human condition in general: “This is the dream, it’s conflict and it’s compromise but it’s exciting!”
It’s was great to see a musical film that is recently produced. And it is not a redo of a broadway show; there were original songs developed for it. The cinematography and choreography were amazing. For someone young like myself who hasn’t grown up watching musicals, it was a fun entertaining movie that cheered me up.

Brazil in Transition

On Wednesday, I went to the Rose Cafe hosted by Andre Simores, an agricultural economist and professor from Brazil.  He began his talk by providing a primarily geographical overview of Brazil, telling us some interesting facts, such as Brazil being the fifth largest country by population.  Simores then discussed the current political climate in Brazil, along with agricultural questions surrounding his research.  

Brazil is diverse in many ways, geographically in particular.  There’s Mato Grosso, with its wetlands, the Amazon rainforest, and Caatinga, an arid area.  Brazil is also economically diverse, with an economy based not only on agriculture, but also aerospace engineering, among others.  For example, Embraer, which is based in Brazil, is the world’s third largest airplane manufacturer, specializing in smaller jets.  

Unfortunately, Brazil has a high degree of inequality, with its northeast part being the poorest.  Yet, Simores would describe Brazil not as a developing country, but rather a country in transition.  After twenty years of a military dictatorship, Brazil has implemented democratic reforms.  Yet, this transition is not without its challenges.  The past two presidents have been impeached for scandals involving corruption and money laundering.  Although power has transitioned peacefully between presidents, Brazil faces mounting obstacles, including high debt and a struggling economy.  In addition to economic struggles, Brazil’s education system favors the rich who can afford private school before heading to the public universities.  

Simores finished his talk by emphasizing how stability is critical to maintaining quality of life everywhere, not just Brazil.  Agriculture faces a volatile market and spot pricing.  I learned that the U.S., for example, will buy excess milk to keep prices stable.  The surplus milk is turned into powdered milk or cheese, and often is served in public schools.  Simores is studying the relationship between dairy farms and processors.  

Overall, this talk gave me a better perspective of the world, and I learned a great deal about life in Brazil.  I was surprised to hear that lunch is the main daily meal, not dinner like in the U.S.  I look forward to future Rose Cafes to keep furthering my perspective and understanding of the world.  

Technology and Mad Max

Watching “Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome” made me think how much technology impacts our lives. The main plot is about a man (Max) who exiled to a desert and ended up in an area where Boeing 747 crashed. The children who were survivors of the accident were left in the oasis desert by their parents. They were desperate to go back to fly to their home land and live in civilization. However, they weren’t able to fly back home since they had no one to fix the air plane. They thought that Max will take them to the civilized world that they saw in the pictures left by their parents which have sky scrapers and bright cities. Personally, the main take away from the movie was appreciation of the technology that we take for granted these days and using them effectively for the common good. I am not surprised that this 1985 movie was chosen over the current movies. I definitely encourage you to watch it over the break!

“Civilization” of the Self

I walked into Flora’s Friday Film ready to see Mad Max Fury Road, as I didn’t realize “Mad Max” was a larger concept. Instead, I saw a younger Mel Gibson and Tina Turner in a film which spoke about the nature of civilization and naivety of children beyond the low-budget but surprisingly well-done action scenes.

Mad max is the prototypical loner-hero combo, a wandering nomad. When he battles Blaster in the Thunderdome, Max stops, sparing Blaster’s life when he finds out he is mentally challenged. His behavior sharply contrasts that of the residents of bartertown, who show no mercy and demand a death. Civilization is not so civilized, and this installment of Mad Max shows the humans living together may congregate towards more feral, mob-like mentalities instead of good.

On the other hand, the children who rescue Mad Max are innocent and unknowing in nature, akin to the lost boys of the Peter Pan story. The create a reality for themselves based on limited evidence and are able to stand by it despite the accumulation of facts presented.

The movie caused me to think about how humans get from being those children, to being members of a society whose core beliefs are not always good. The contrast between individual and group, and child and man run deep, and may be astonishingly accurate even now.

Why is it Called Thunderdome?

My first question after watching Mad Max: Beyond Thunderdome was why is this film even called Thunderdome. The “Thunderdome” is a cage fight which lasts maybe a quarter of the movie, and it wasn’t discussed before or after that scene. Arguably, the movie could more accurately called Mad Max: Underground Pigs, or even Mad Max: Airplanes since there were multiple scenes which featured an airplane prominently.  It seems like some movie executive liked the word “Thunderdome” and made that the title. The content of the movie was about as logical and thought-out as the title. The plot gets a little lost halfway through the film and society has REALLY taken a weird turn considering its only been like 30 years since the start of the apocalypse. Apparently the moment law and order break down, humanity’s first course of action will be to start wearing headdresses and covering our cars in cow hide. So should anyone watch this movie? Yes.

Thunderdome isn’t a good movie, but nevertheless it serves a purpose as a representation of the culture of the 1980s. Some of the things which we label as flaws in the movie were put into the film intentionally. Therefore, they shouldn’t be seen as flaws, but rather indications of how culture has changes over the last 30 years since this movie was made. Now I know that the 1980s aren’t some mysterious era which has been obscured by the mists of time. Nevertheless, old media from the past is a good way to see the feelings, emotions, and values o the people during that time. Thunderdome, or really any 1980s movies (there are better ones), should be watched to view a culture which is different from our own. We can learn from the experience and maybe understand how our present culture has come to be.

Mad Max

Last Friday I attended the showing of Mad Max in Rose Main. I had never seen the film before, and was thus surprised by the societal commentary present. The depiction of the primitive law, and the way in which people conduct themselves in a post-nuclear society spoke to certain sociological implications of human nature and formation of society.

Specifically, the Thunderdome and “break a deal, spin the wheel” laws were interesting in their basis in retributive justice, which we have started to stray away from currently as a society. It was incredibly interesting to see the way in which the film explained the formation/need for order in a dystopian, post-apocalyptic society. Another component of the commentary I found interesting was the society of children who believed Mad Max was their deity figure. This scene in particular said much about the formation of religion, and has interesting implications for the way in which information can be distorted through generations to form a mythology, in addition to the way in which religion is a product of disastrous circumstances.

Overall, I found the film entertaining and interesting from an ethnographic point of view. The film’s setting really makes you think about the way our own society would degrade and rebuild in the case of such a circumstance.

Bird watching: A Great Hobby

I don’t remember when or why I started bird watching. I do know my middle school science fair project was about whether expensive bird seed attracted more birds than the bargain brand, thus justifying the extra expense. Result: Maybe, if you believe a seventh graders science. (I did get to make an awesome stacked bar graph, breaking results down by number and species.) I haven’t been “birding” much recently, and visiting the Cornell lab of ornithology reminded me of why I started birding in the first place. So I’d like to use this blog post as something of a PSA for why everyone should birdwatch.

Firstly, birding is a great way to relieve stress. It gets you out in nature. Also, birds are both cute and charismatic. Our guide at the lab of ornithology talked about the value of anthropomorphizing birds, so that you can recognize and remember them by their personalities, rather than relying on field marks. And, to someone with experiences, birds definitely seem to have unique characters. Blue Jays are loud and abrasive, sort of bullying. Mourning doves have a slightly goofy, pigeonish thing going on. Cardinals move with quick, jerky movements that sometimes seem almost robotic.  Getting lost in the world of birds is a good way to distract yourself.

But, you can also get super competitive with your birding. A lot of birders keep “life lists” of all the species they have ever seen. It’s kind of like Pokémon, except that with thousands of species worldwide, it isn’t really feasible to catch them all. Or, you could go with more of a Moby Dick metaphor, chasing down that one bird that alludes you. For me, it’s the Brown Creeper. They smallish, with white bellies and brown wings. They climb trees in a characteristic spiral pattern, using their tails to prop themselves up as they go. And I would very much like to see one. According to the range maps, they are fairly common in Ithaca and its environs, and yet I cannot find them.

Our guide also said that learning about birds helps connect you to the natural world. It provides a sense of constancy when you travel. Ithaca can be very different from where I live, but the birds are see here are all the same ones I observed for my bird seed science fair project. So, I would tell everyone, at least learn a few birds, the ones you most commonly see. Especially during the spring, it’s nice to know which birds you here singing as you walk around campus (a lot of times, it’s robins. They have a nice, musical song).

If I can go further, I would suggest that if you only learn one local bird, make it the Chickadee. They have a sort of cream color on their bellies, grey on their wings, with a black beard a black cap on their heads. They have a roundish body, golf ball size or thereabouts. Birders often use mnemonics to describe bird songs, which for the most part I cannot make heads or tails of, but chickadees honestly do say “Chicka-dee-dee-dee”. They’re probably my favorite backyard bird, because they’re adorable and gregarious, usually the first to discover a newly set up feeder.

I believe the best reason to go birding is expressed by something I learned at the end of my tour. Our tour guide told us that the statue in front of the lab is of a passenger pigeon. I say we should all appreciate nature now, because as the passenger pigeon proves, there is no guarantee that any species will persist forever.

Mad Max: A Symbol of Cold War Fears and the Flaws of Civilization

Last Friday, I attended Rose’s screening of the post-apocalyptic film, Mad Max: Beyond Thunderdome. Although I didn’t particularly enjoy the movie, I could see why it was an important film for its time. It was released in 1985, one of the final years of the Cold War. Through this lens, we can view the movie as an encapsulation of the fears of the American people, who foresaw nuclear devastation and destruction by the USSR. These anxieties towards the Soviet Union are manifested in two important scenes. The first is Bartertown’s (the town to which protagonist Max travels to take back his stolen belongings) punishment of Max, as they send him to the “Gulag.” Gulags were, in reality, Stalinist labor camps, where high mortality rates and difficult working conditions befell people sent there. The second scene referencing the USSR is that in which a Bartertown resident is thrown into a pig pen to be eaten by the animals. I saw the use of pigs as a clear reference to Animal Farm, an allegory in which author George Orwell uses farm animals to portray the Russian Revolution and Stalinist era of the USSR. In the book, pigs represent historical Russian figures, including Stalin and Lenin. Therefore, in this scene,  the pigs could be construed as a symbol of the USSR, and their near consumption of a Bartertown citizen as a representation of the fears of the American people.

In addition to manifesting Cold War fears, Mad Max also makes interesting points about what it means to be a civilization. The movie portrays civilization and savagery, two normally dichotomous concepts, as synonymous. Bartertown is a symbol of both the civilized world and barbaric tendencies. With infrastructure, livestock (pigs), a source of electrical energy (porcine feces), merchants, blacksmiths, and a bar, the town can be viewed as a civilization in the post-apocalyptic world. On the other hand, the level of savagery is profound: residents challenge other residents to fight in Bartertown’s Thunderdome, where “two men enter and one man leaves.” When Max enters the Thunderdome for a fight to the death, the citizens of Bartertown are sadistically thrilled and energized that they will get to see someone killed. This movie thus makes the important point that savagery and civilization are not mutually exclusive. It reminds us that we must pay attention to our own civilization because even though we have infrastructure, a Constitution, roads, and settled homes, we are not immune to the possibility of savagery and barbarism.

Master and Blaster, Mind and Body

Last Friday, I watched Mad Max: Beyond Thunderdome in the Rose dining hall. I had seen the newest installment, Fury Road, when it came out, and I thoroughly enjoyed it not only because of the action but because of feminist icon Furiosa. Fury Road being my first exposure to this post-apocalyptic universe, it was interesting to see how dated this movie, made in 1985, was compared to the 2015 film. The color and resolution quality of Beyond Thunderdome was one noticeable difference, but another obvious indicator could be seen from Mel Gibson’s mullet, a classic 80’s hairstyle, compared to Tom Hardy’s shorter style.

While I found Beyond Thunderdome interesting as a time piece, beyond that I found nothing extremely compelling about the plot. However, I did think the dynamic between the characters Master and Blaster was an interesting statement about the division between mind and body. Master is a dwarfed man who sits on the shoulders of the physically able and strong Blaster, and together they form one character “Masterblaster.” Master is portrayed as intelligent and power-hungry, with a deep understanding of the political heirarchy of Bartertown. He knows that though he seemingly is in charge of literal pig shit, he in fact controls the whole town because the fecal matter of the pigs powers the electricity, and without power, the town cannot function. Blaster is  portrayed as the brawn, following the commands of Master to a T. He is revealed during his fight with Max to be developmentally disabled with the mental functions of a child, as Master screams “Don’t kill Blaster! He’s just a baby!” On his own, Master is disabled by his dwarfed height, and without Master, Blaster is lost and without guidance. This symbiotic relationship to me represents that the two components, mind and body, though functional on their own, are incomplete without core aspects of the other.

Mad Max – A lot of pig shit

I really enjoyed the 80s vibe of Mad Max, but that’s probably the only good thing I can say about it. While I am a fan of apocalyptic stories, it was difficult to see the messages, if any, that Mad Max intended for audiences to grasp. Perhaps it’s one of those movies that you should watch multiple times before you understand the meaning. Perhaps it would’ve been better had I seen the first two movies.

It was a typical post-apocalypse film, but toward the end Max meets a lot of raggedy children, survivors of a crashed 747, which reminded me of Peter Pan’s “Lost Boys.” As with all movies, I try to look for symbols. I found it interesting that society in Bartertown is not actually that different from society today. There is a clear separation of classes in the movie: the ruler Aunty, the “regular” folk, and the pig workers underground. We worship sports and entertainment just like Bartertowners love the Thunderdome.

But I think most importantly–and I’m not completely sure this was intentional–it seems that in hard times people will always look up to someone, or something. Many people on this planet are religious, and while there was no religion in Mad Max, there was always someone that people looked up to or yearned for. For the people of Bartertown, this was Aunty and, for a little bit, Master Blaster. As for the kids? They basically worshipped the idea of their captain coming back to save them. In fact, they were so sure that when they found Max they believed he was their lost captain. Of course, Max made clear that he was not, but eventually, after saving them multiple times, was Max not their hero, their captain? Did he not eventually lead them to safety and thus become the captain whose story they carved into the sides of the oasis?

Perhaps we should remember that even if something we believe it isn’t true, there may be something else that’s just as good, and that when people are desperate, they will believe anything. Like fake news.

Brazilian Landscape, not Agriculture

Wednesday’s Rose Cafe with Andre Simores seemed a little off topic and off the cuff, but it was very interesting to learn about the different parts of Brazil. Simores went into great detail about the different climates and landscape present in the country. The google images shown of the country I’m sure are only a small testament to how beautiful the diverse landscape of Brazil truly is.

Andre also spoke to the education system in Brazil. He talked about how the best universities are public and free to go to. However, it is mainly the wealthy who are able to go to these schools. This happens because the wealthy people are able to afford to go to private high schools and can get into the best universities. This is a really sad phenomenon, especially in a country that has such a divide between the rich and the poor, and a country that is trying to fix that and improve the overall economy. I’m not sure how this could be fixed, as tuition is already free. Also, if you bring in people who do not have as good of a base education by finding the brightest in worse high schools, they often fall behind in college which can lead to many issues, like dropping out and even depression.

I wish that Andre Simores spoke more about his work and the agriculture industry in Brazil. They hold a great part of the world’s rainforests, which are being compromised by the agriculture industry because of deforestation to create either grazing land for cattle or to plant crops. Brazil is a key player in agriculture, and hearing a Brazilian’s perspective on the issue would have been really interesting.

culture SHOCK

Last Wednesday, I attended the Rose Cafe where Andre Simores spoke about his home country, Brazil. I learned a lot of things about Brazil that I had not known before, including Brazil is the 5th largest country, and there are a variety of ecosystems, from the rainforest near the Amazon River to rural and agricultural areas of Minas Gerais. Simores and his wife also discussed the differences in schooling between Brazil and the US. In Brazil, those who can afford it send their children to private high schools in order to ensure they will get a full ride to a public college, while in the United States, usually those who attend private high schools attend private colleges.

The most important difference that I observed was the cultural differences that occurred even just within the talk itself. Simores was obviously still in the process of learning English and giving a talk in front of a room full of native English speakers was probably no easy task. I took French in high school for 4 years and barely felt comfortable presenting in front of my class during this time, so I would not have been surprised if Simores was a bit nervous by the presentation. It was easy to see some of the cultural differences, even in the way Simores spoke and presented his information, and even working through the presentation doing Google searches. It really emphasized the differences between American and Brazilian culture, as using a laptop and doing Google searches is second nature for almost all Americans, and really got me thinking and considering the living circumstances of other places. In addition, the language differences were evident as certain English phrases were different from Portuguese phrases, even if they have the same meaning. It is very easy at Cornell to get wrapped up in schoolwork, social life and extracurricular activities and forget about other cultures, but I think this talk reminded me to consider others more, and was a learning experience for both sides.

Google Brazil

Today Andre spoke about Brazil. He reminded us that Brazil is huge! It is the fifth largest country in the world. It has almost every kind of climate, from dry grass lands to tropical wetlands. He showed us pictures of the most beautiful places in Brazil. To be honest, this google image search went on a little too long for my taste. Luckily, he dove into deeper topics as the talk went on. Andre assured us that the new president is bringing about positive changes. Previously, the politics of Brazil were extremely corrupt. It still exists, but the people are starting to fight against the corruption. Corruption is one of the biggest problems in Brazil, and it weakens all of its institutions.  Andre went on to discuss the history of democracy in Brazil, and the  cycles of change that occurred to create the current government.

This talk was informative, but I was disappointed about the style of the talk. While I learned things about Brazil that I didn’t know before, I realize I could have easily acquired this information from a wikipedia page. I wish Andre spoke more about his personal experience, or about his area of expertise which is dairy supply. I appreciate the effort Andre put into teaching us about Brazil. However, I hope the next Rose café will teach me more than I can learn from a quick google search.

Mad Max: A Mixed Bag

Last Friday, I went to go see Mad Max: Beyond the Thunderdome. I had heard a lot of good things about the Max Max franchise, so I was expecting great things. Unfortunately, I did not enjoy the movie as much as I though I would. It was a post-apocolytic action film, so that might have had something to do with it. I don’t particularly like action films. The writers tried to make the violence humorous but I did not find it very humorous. But, compared to the other action movies that I’ve seen, this was one of the better ones. I did enjoy the character “Master”. He was quite funny. I really found it sad when “Blaster” was killed. He was mentally challenged and I really don’t think that he should have been killed. I’m glad that I went to go see Mad Max because now I know why a lot of people enjoy the movie.

La La Land: Living up to the hype?

Last Sunday, I saw the film La La Land for the first time. Despite it being one of the most talked about movies so far this year, I managed to avoid all spoilers so I could take in and enjoy every moment of the movie experience. So, if you haven’t seen La La Land and plan to do so at some point, beware that there are major spoilers below!

Walking into the theatre, I wasn’t sure that I was going to like the movie. Perhaps because of the way that it was presented, I expected it to be a cliche, romanticised story about dreams coming true, finding true love, etc. Furthermore, there are some criticisms of the film for being problematic. For example, one reviewer deemed it to be “whitewashed nostalgia” which is of course an important issue that should be talked about in the movie industry.

However, as soon as the movie began, I forgot about the real world and was immediately absorbed into the charm of the opening sequence. The flawless acting, storytelling, and singing made for a great production. The film also surprised me in ways I did not expect. In particular, I loved the ending. I think most people expected a “perfect” ending between the two main characters but I prefer the true ending because it shows that we do not live in a fairy-tale world and things don’t always work the way you want. We always live with some regrets and “what if’s,” but that’s okay.

On some degree, I do think the movie was a little bit overrated. I think the idea that “Hollywood loves movies about Hollywood” applies here. I personally couldn’t relate so much to the film’s themes such as the struggles of being an artist, but I imagine it would resonate well with a certain audience. I didn’t find the movie to be life-changing or incredibly revolutionary like some of the other films nominated this past awards season, but nonetheless I do think La La Land is a great production with catchy songs that certainly knows how to entertain an audience for two hours.

Parallels between Beyond The Thunderdome and Fury Road

Mad Max: Beyond The Thunderdome is the second Mad Max movie that I’ve watched, the first one being Fury Road. Although I preferred Fury Road, I found both of the movies interesting because of the similarities that they shared. Granted, it was probably Fury Road that was inspired/loosely based off  Beyond The Thunderdome.

Both the movies are set in a desolate, desert area, where water and fuel is cherished. Both have a dictatorial leader, who literally lives above the rest of their populaces. In Fury Road, Immortal Joe lived in a rocky cliff above everyone else. He controlled resources of water that he showered from above, based on his mood. In Beyond The Thunderdome, Auntie Entity also lives above everyone else, in a house lifted on stilts. Although she doesn’t shower water like Immorten Joe, she too is in a position of great privilege.

Another interesting parallel was the idea of ‘labelling’ human beings. In Beyond The Thunderdome, we notice that a man is marked as a ‘Pig Killer’, because he tried to feed his family by stealing a pig. Similarly, in Fury Road, once Max is captured, he too is tattooed to be a ‘human blood bag’. Furiosa too had a mark on the nape of her neck.

The plots of the movies also shared similarities. In Beyond the Thunderdome, Savannah calls out to the group of children to signal that she found someone. In Fury Road, Valkyrie also calls out to the Vulvalini of Many Mothers. In both movies, the calls signified important changes in the plot. In Fury Road, Furiosa meets the Many Mothers and later discovers that she was taken from them as a child. In Beyond The Thunderdome, Max meets the abandoned children who he decides to help.

Both movies shared many similarities, almost so that watching them in succession could almost feel repetitive. In both movies, Max is portrayed as the saviour, who never gets gets saved. At the end of both movies, Max’s story line is ended abruptly, leaving the audience unaware of his future plight. This would probably allow greater freedom for the production of sequels.