Let’s Leave the Term “Chick Flicks” in the 2000s

Although I’m not an avid movie watcher, I enjoyed the discussion surrounding the connection between romantic comedies and feminism. In my opinion, branding romantic comedies as “chick flicks” is anti-feminist. The term “chick flicks” perpetuates a negative stereotype that implies only women can watch these films. Romantic comedies should be for all genders. I think in order to combat this “chick flick” stereotype, film productions needed to introduce new narratives. Maybe film producers are reluctant to change because they think that the traditional rom com tropes sell. Fortunately, movies like “Love, Simon” are changing the idea of what a “typical” rom-com looks like. While this is great progress, this is not enough and more definitely needs to be done. More races, more gender identities, more sexual orientations need to be represented in today’s media.

One thought on “Let’s Leave the Term “Chick Flicks” in the 2000s

  1. While I somewhat disagree with this assessment of “click flicks” being anti-feminist, I can definitely understand your point here.

    I personally think that the term “click flick” is just a hollow label and it’s been mostly been going out of style as a term altogether — it doesn’t mean that only women “can” watch them. Depending on the movie and the overall vibes it gives off, it can reach very different audiences.

    I do agree that some fall into a sort of subcategory of modern media that can get kind of “samey”. “Love, Simon” is definitely a breath of fresh air as more people are being represented, and it’s a great thing to see.