If you see 20 dollars on your bus seat, what would you do? What if it’s a 100 dollar bill? And would your actions change if it’s a wallet?
Although I probably wouldn’t do anything if it’s a 20 dollar bill, if it’s a wallet, I would ask around to see if anyone lost it. My opinion on this was so strong that I even considered it unethical to keep silent if I see a lost wallet, which might contain valuable IDs and bank cards along with a significant amount of cash. But is this the ethical action?
Some people choose not to ask. They considered something that wasn’t a part of my decision making: what if people lie about their ownership of the money? Can you really trust others?
I was taken aback upon hearing this. This reasoning makes complete sense, and this scenario is more complicated than I imagined. If the owner of the wallet has already left the car, asking around would in the best case be futile and in the worst case be an opportunity for others to lie and get away with the money. Situations like these are ethical dilemmas not because some people fail to understand why certain actions are ethical or unethical, but because there’s no simple right or wrong for those actions. Different actions are backed up by distinct considerations, and those considerations stem from both past experiences and personal values. Someone who encountered a similar situation before would evaluate their actions based on the previous outcome. A positive outcome would be the motivation for repeating the action, whereas a negative one causes people to turn to alternatives.
It turns out, the ethical dilemma above do not involve the hardest choices to make. Although people have different opinions on this, most know exactly what they want to do. Many hard dilemmas involve personal relationships. For instance, you find a close friend’s boyfriend cheating on her, would you let your friend know? Situations like this have huge impacts, and our ethics might conflict with our feelings. Making a choice is hard because the optimal choice doesn’t exist during decision making. All choices are probabilistic, and the “best” actions are all retrospective conclusions that involve information you didn’t have back then.
From this seminar, I learned to be more understanding of others actions. Arriving at hasty judgements of others’ actions is risky in the sense that I might not understand their reasoning. While actions harming others are usually clearly unethical, other actions can be a lot more complex. Even though a definition for ethics is standards that most people agree on, in the end, everyone’s understanding of ethics is unique and ethical dilemmas are dilemmas because of this huge variation that exists in our beliefs.