Attempts to Interpret Sundance Shorts

Last Saturday, I had the opportunity to go see a stunning collection of short films from the last Sundance festival.  I enjoyed every one of the films, though I can’t definitively say that I understood some of them.

“5 Films About Technology” is a collection of comedic scenarios focused on modern peoples’ occasionally ridiculous relationships with technology and an interconnected world.  For instance, the ritual taking of food photos in a restaurant.

“Ten Meter Tower” consists of footage of people challenged to jump off of a 10m high dive.  The film is an exercise in constant suspense — person after person goes back and forth between the edge and the ladder, talking themselves into and out of jumping.  It demonstrates how perhaps irrational fears are a common human experience, and the how bravery does not always come from the people one might expect it from.

“Lucia, Before and After” features a young woman trying to get an abortion, and shows how she spends the Texas-mandated 24 hour waiting period after her sonogram.  She tries to beg for a room and food at a hotel, but is turned away.  She dines sand dashes, and sleeps in her car.  She  has no money and no support.  The film highlights how abortion really is the only option for many women.

“Pussy” is a surreal, animated depiction of a woman exploring her own sexual pleasure.  She’s having an unsuccessful evening attempting to masturbate, when her vagina literally peels itself off of her body, grows legs, and walks around like a little animal.  It walks around rubbing itself on all kinds of things to represent her exploring different methods of pleasure and it even scares away a voyeur.  A slightly unnerving, but hilarious and endearing film.

“And the Whole Sky Fit in the Dead Cow’s Eye” completely confused me.  A Mexican man’s cattle die mysteriously due to what is later determined to be a lightning strike.  His mother, is visited by a dead man who tells her that he has come to take her son, so she begs to be allowed to die instead.  Her son tries to kill himself, but  the dead man leads the mother into the woods.  Presumably she has traded her life for his successfully, but I have no clue what it means or what it says about society.

“Night Shift” was one of my favorite films of the collection.  It’s a touching snapshot of a night in the life of a black man who works a degrading and unsatisfying job as a bathroom attendant in a club, while also dealing with a crumbling marriage.  He suffers ridiculous demands and cruel treatment at the hands of his largely white patrons in return for tips.  One man bribes the main character to let him have sex with a girl in one of the stalls.  Another urinates on the ground, and then throws the tip in the puddle while hurling verbal abuse.  Eventually, the man gathers the courage to pull in his wife (who also works in the club) and convince her to dance with him for just one song.  They share a fun and intimate dance, and when she leaves, she says that she “might” have dinner with him sometime.

The setting is particularly interesting in how it contrasts humiliation and joy, the worst and best of humanity, all in one room.  Additionally, the bathroom is empty and claustrophobic, but the music of the bustling club can constantly be heard, which seems to highlight the underlying feeling of being isolated at the edge of the excitement of life.  I think the film’s depictions of uncertainty and lack of fulfillment are universal, but the racial themes are also clear.  I particularly loved how the film made no effort to adhere to a traditional story arc.  As soon as it opened to a man examining divorce papers, I thought for sure it was going to be the story of how he came to terms with the divorce or how he won his wife back for good.  Neither happened.  The film had no conclusion, no closure.  Instead, he simply finishes work and drives home.  That’s it.  That’s the night, so that’s the film.

The film “Come Swim”, was a surreal depiction of…well, something.  A man wakes up in a dilapidated house, and goes about an eerie and lonely workday in a rundown world.  Meanwhile, he is constantly haunted by a voice asking him to “Come swim with me”, to which he responds, “But I don’t want to”.  He compulsively seeks out water and is constantly thirsty.  He feverishly drinks and pours water over himself, but it’s never enough.  At the end of the day he begins driving to the ocean, and in each shot his body begins to decay.  He passes out before reaching the waves, and children appear to drag him into the water.

To me this seemed to clearly be a metaphor for addiction.  A voice in his head tempts him constantly, though he doesn’t want to obey.  The more he drinks, the more thirsty he becomes.  His body begins to fall apart.  He becomes driven by compulsion and seems to die trying to reach a source of ultimate satiation.  (Also, the ocean is saltwater — it would never actually satisfy thirst.)  Other ghostly voices that are heard throughout the film and say things like, “It couldn’t happen to me”.

The second half of the film seems to support this idea.  This time, he wakes up in a normal bedroom and goes to work at an average looking office.  At many of the points where he drank water the first time around, he smokes a cigarette the second.   I actually liked the film better before seeing the second half, when the water could represent any kind of addiction, and the symbolism was less clear.  I even thought the film was somewhat heavy handed at times.

After a brief survey of synopses and reviews, however, apparently nobody agrees with me.  The director herself says the film is about “heartbreak”.  I suppose, just like poetry, everyone can get something different out of a film.  Perhaps the intent of the creators of a film doesn’t matter as much as the interpretation of the viewer.

A lack of understanding

I’ve always heard about Sundance, but I was never really interested in the idea of eclectic films. I don’t know if my mind has changed after viewing a compilation of shorts from Sundance. That’s not to say I don’t have eclectic tastes; mine just don’t seem to match up with what Sundance tends to tout. To be honest, it seemed like a collection of videos you might find on the weird part of the internet. Perhaps my perception of a short film is skewed because I grew up with access to online video sharing, but I don’t understand trying to hold film to a more expensive standard.

The shorts were definitely eclectic. The first one dealt with water and obsessive thoughts, and honestly, I didn’t want to watch it. It made me uncomfortable, which I guess was part of its intent, but I didn’t understand its purpose. This was sort of a running theme throughout the shorts – I guess I’m just not the target audience for these pieces. The shortest short was one on technology, and to be honest, I don’t really know why it was part of this collection. It’s a concept that is overplayed and unoriginal and besides the quality of the equipment used, I don’t think the writing or acting were superior to something you would find in a quick youtube video.

Perhaps my problem in not understanding these shorts is online content. Since there was so little plot happening in the first short with the water and in a short about a bathroom attendant, I just felt like they were a little too long. I get that setting up a character is important, but I felt like I didn’t need to see that much. Since I’m regularly busy with other things to do, I often watch sped-up videos or just stop watching if I feel like there’s a lot of nothing going on.

Another short that seemed very internet to me was the one with the diving board. It seemed very strange to me how this experiment was set up. It’s not like these were completely random people that went to the pool that day and walked up 10 meters to the platform. There was clearly some incentive to them jumping. Also, the participants clearly knew about each other, because one of them even mentioned an older woman taking the leap. This one too felt like it was longer than it needed to be.

The weirdest short was the animated short about a vagina. It’s a piece about a woman exploring her body but suddenly the vulva comes off and turns into its own creature and rubs itself against different things in her apartment, but the woman is still connected to what the pussy experiences. This, to me, was the epitome of weird internet video.

Unless there was a message I just wasn’t getting, these shorts just did no resonate with me. I don’t think I would watch anything else made by the same people if their work tends to be similar. Call me a millennial, but I would rather stay at home and curate my own viewing experience of online videos, or shorts (whatever that terms actually means).

“Ten Meter Tower”: Taking the Leap

“Ten Meter Tower” is the epitome of Swedish film: quiet, slow-paced, and raw. One of the Sundance Shorts selected for the 2017 Sundance Film Tour, “Ten Meter Tower” places it’s “actors” – ordinary people who had never jumped off of a ten meter diving board – on a sparse set, consisting of just the diving board with unconcealed microphones recording them as they made the decision to jump, or not. The directors, Maximilien Van Aertryck and Axel Danielson, kept the focus on the diving board itself, sometimes juxtaposing two divers making the decision at different times and occasionally switching the frame to show them fall or emerge from the water.

We are used to presentations of courage in unusual situations with lots of drama, danger, and often ideals and/or lives at stake. But here was a very ordinary situation with everyday people, no dramatic lighting or music to distract from a decision that ultimately had no consequences. Here was a battle between instinct (it’s no wonder your body tells you not to drop into a ten meter free-fall) and intellect (you know it won’t hurt you, you’d be embarrassed to climb down), and even though it’s on a small scale, it’s deeply poignant. The film authentically captures what it is to be crippled by doubt and the effort it takes to overcome your fears and take the leap. Director Van Aertryck writes in a New York Times Op-Ed, “‘Ten Meter Tower’ may take place in Sweden, but we think it elucidates something essentially human, that transcends culture and origins. Overcoming our most cautious impulses with bravery unites all humankind. It’s something that has shaped us through the ages.” The film is a surprising revelation of this basic human struggle, and its quiet drama is captivating.

In the last scene, as if to say that our own private struggles are great drama in their own way, the unembellished style of the body of the film makes way for the classic drama of film: the camera follows the last diver in slow motion as she plummets to the water below, body turning over and over in her star-spangled swimsuit. “Ode to Joy” blasts triumphantly, and her feet slide smoothly into the water:

Gladly, as His heavenly bodies fly
On their courses through the heavens,
Thus, brothers, you should run your race,
As a hero going to conquest.

 

You can watch “Ten Meter Tower” and read more about it here.

Capturing the moment

This Sunday, I went to see Sundance film with my Rose Scholar fellow friends together. It was an interesting experience, because it’s my first time seeing short film in a cinema. Each films are featured in different special ideas and ways that they send their message across in a short 20~30 mins time. Some of them capture the momentum feelings; one described the short moment in daily life; some capture a short decision making time.

Due to the nature of short films, they have to be short, so there’s not much room for them to develop a convoluted plot or story that lead you through the developing of each characters life to their destiny. Instead, in short film, they captured a moment in life, normally not exceding a day or even half a day. I think it’s a very different genre of arts comparing to the 2 hours film that we normally see.

At first, I was really confused and feel uncomfortable when seeing these films, because like a microscope, short films magnified small moment in life that we not feeling well, or making a decision. For example, the 17 mins film Come Swim, described a person feeling drawn and thirsty back an forth. The vague technique in the description and the intense sound effect of water drinking sound, his breathing sound made my heart pound yet not clear what the film try to express, besides a depressing feeling and a relieve at last after the actor jump into the river and swim for a while. This film made me feel dizzy for a while due to the keep changing scene and uncomfort sound effect. Another film ‘night shift’ described a men working at a night club, and having a shift one day while he just got the devorcing note from his wife again. This film is very touching, because it showed us the emotion transition of the character, and know a different life.

It was a wonderful experience this week, and I really enjoyed the time appreciating a new genre of art.

The Difficulty of Critiquing Experimental Films

Every year the Sundance Film Festival showcases a collection of short films that runs about the time of a feature length film. This year, the program had 7 short films. Each focused on a very different theme and most had experimental aspects to them. The one film that stands out to me was the first one, Come Swim. It’s hard to describe the film other than by saying it’s really surrealist.  There’s not a single, coherent meaning to it like most films or any explanation whatsoever for the events taking place. It’s hard to criticize beyond this, but then again that’s a more general characteristic I’ve noticed in experimental films.

The difficulty in criticizing such films is that most traditional types of criticisms are inapplicable. You can’t say, “oh the acting was terrible” because it may have very well been a critical point that that was the point (think Peter Watkins). Similarly, the complaint “but it’s inconsistent” is also inapplicable. This is perhaps one of the most interesting points where experimental films diverge from others. Even in a film like Star Wars, one can criticize “surely if this were real, Kit Fisto and the other Jedi Knights wouldn’t have been killed off so quickly by Darth Sidious…” However, with experimental films, their inconsistency is perhaps a defining characteristic. And maybe that’s why people don’t like watching them as much.