Particle Accelerator!

Last week I visited CHESS: Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source. A woman who works there named Laura and GRF David gave us a tour of the operation. The synchrotron is basically a half mile long oval track that carries particles. I was fascinated to learn how the synchrotron works. The aim is to accelerate subatomic particles: specifically electrons and positrons, which are basically positive, antimatter versions of electrons. The synchrotron does this by sending the particles through a large potential difference (voltage drop) to accelerate them up to nearly the speed of light in a fraction of a second. The particles start by whizzing around the synchrotron’s inner ring, and are then transferred into the outer storage ring, CESR. The particles are kept up to speed by going through further potential differences around the track. Their path is curved by magnets to stay in the track, and every few meters they are focused by other magnetic apparatuses.

The synchrotron was initially used to study collisions between matter electrons and antimatter positrons, by accelerating them in opposite directions around the track and then colliding them in a special chamber, where the emitted radiation and particles could be quantitatively and qualitatively measured. This chamber is now being dismantled, as the physicists have determined everything they can about the collisions. Presently, the accelerated particles are being used to produce X-rays which are useful in experiments. Shooting specimens with these X-rays and looking at the resulting diffraction pattern is a way to determine the mechanical properties of the specimens on an atomic scale. I was fascinated by the differing applications. Everyone was there: from the air force testing metal alloys for planes to biological researchers looking at the structure of proteins. I’m interested to see what new advances come out of CHESS in the future!

The Advocate’s Balance

Last week I attended the Rose cafe, and heard Laura Rodriguez de Simons lead a discussion about having a career in advocacy. I enjoyed hearing her diverse perspective, as she has done development and advocacy work in Ethiopia, Honduras, and now here in Ithaca. The major theme that I got out of the discussion was that finding a balance between compassion and practicality is important when doing this type of work.

One thing that struck me as interesting and non-intuitive was Laura’s tip that, if  you decide to do advocacy or development work, not to do anything “too sensible”. A mindset of  compassion, not one of efficiency and productivity, needs to take center stage in this type of work. It’s important to see people as people, not projects. Therefore, doing what you feel exactly equipped to do can actually take away from the experience. On the other hand, Laura has been able to use her “sensible” MBA in her current role.

Also on the practical side: in her current role at the advocacy center in Ithaca, Laura’s organization is careful to develop strict boundaries regarding advocates interacting with their clients. Many have heart-wrenching stories, so it can be easy to get too absorbed in their situations in a way that is ultimately unhealthy. Time not on the work clock is clearly personal time. Taking time off is encouraged, and it’s clearly stated that clients can’t contact advocates when they are not working. It must be difficult to strike this balance, but Laura maintained that it is healthier to operate in this fashion. It’s important to be able to take a step back from a situation and not get too emotionally invested.

I really appreciated Laura’s advice, and will certainly keep it in mind as I consider different types of missions work in the future!

Unforseen Consequences

Tonight’s Rose Cafe was a surprise: instead of hearing a talk on China and the US Economy, Professor Andrew Mertha spoke about Cambodia and the influence (or lack thereof) of Chinese foreign policy on the Southeast Asian nation during the Khmer Rouge. What I found most interesting, however, was what precipitated the rise of the Khmer Rouge: US military action.

At this point, it should hardly be surprising. As Professor Mertha pointed out, the US has an awful track record of nation building in the (alleged) attempt to promote democracy since the 1950s. In Vietnam, we facilitated a free election – and then propped up an unpopular candidate when the communists won the election, leading to the Vietnam conflict, which caused over 1.3 million deaths. Spillover from this conflict in neighboring Cambodia, in the form of more bombs dropped on the country than in all of World War II, scarred and battle hardened the Khmer Rouge, one of the most extreme and self-destructive political entities ever to control a modern country. Excessive violence sparked more excessive violence. After seizing power, the Khmer Rouge killed a fantastic amount of the Cambodian population, including intellectuals, supposed dissenters, and the religious, in the attempt to establish agricultural communes. Basic life was obliterated: families were basically outlawed; currency was abolished; medical care and education were removed; everything was done communally-or you were killed. Almost a quarter of the population died.

We see the unanticipated effects of US foreign military involvement in the Middle East as well. The CIA’s training of guerilla militias in Afghanistan, indoctrinated to hate the invading USSR, lead to the formation of Al Qaeda. More recently, the CIA’s funding of Islamic fundamentalist groups in Syria to fight against Assad supported the rise of ISIS.

Who can tell what shocking and unforseen consequences US military involvement will have in unstable regions? We need to be mindful: human life is not cheap, and it is often the price paid due to the way we get involved to support our immediate agenda (even if this agenda is positive and moral in many ways, such as taking down a bloodthirsty tyrant). The world is a complicated place, so we need to understand, respect, and make decisions based on the perspectives of those on all sides of any given equation. This is likely one of the greatest struggles we will have to grapple with in the fight to promote peace throughout the world.

Uprooting Rape

On Sunday I attended a dinner with Kate Harding, who was visiting Cornell to raise awareness about rape culture. Going into the dinner, I wasn’t sure exactly what the term meant. As she explained it, rape culture describes a society that protects those accused of rape more than the victims. People are more likely to ask questions like “Are you sure you were really raped?” than “How can I help you through this catastrophe?” Kate made it clear that rape is a very real, very present thing that no one likes to talk about. It hits closer to home than people want to confess: rape is a reality here at Cornell, and it’s perpetrators aren’t scary guys jumping out of the bushes – they are people we go to class with, even people who seem “nice”. Recognizing the reality of rape is important to combat the crime and support victims.

In terms of prevention, it’s important to set the stage: we live in a very open culture, which tells us that we can do whatever we please, and that we are our own authority. We are constantly bombarded by music, TV, movies, etc. that feed off of lust and the objectification of people’s (especially women’s) bodies, shaping perspectives which rob others of their intrinsic human dignity. People (especially women again) have it drilled into them that they should find their value in sex appeal, further supporting this objectification. The idea that you’re not a man unless you have had sex permeates college culture to a significant degree, and is evident in the party scene. Alcohol -which does wonders to seriously inhibit people’s decision making capacities AND decreases their sexual inhibitions – flows freely at parties. Basically, it seems that hookup/party culture, although very distinct and different than rape culture, naturally enables sexual assault. If we are serious about preventing rape, I think it’s important to combat it at every level. It’s important to educate people on the gravity and presence of rape, but I doubt that that alone will curb it. Paradigms need to be altered. Would we be willing to examine our lifestyles and mindsets in order to support victims of rape and protect people from being assaulted? What are you willing to do to help uproot rape?

Crafting the Question of Purpose

I had the pleasure to visit the Johnson Museum and revel in some of it’s beautiful artwork. It’s remarkable to have such an amazing collection here on campus, free and open to student use, and I highly encourage checking it out on the weekends, or even as a quick study break! It’s fun to let the mind wander over the flashy or subtle beauties of a work of art, whether it be a painting, sculpture, or some other sort of creative display.

There were many remarkable pieces of artwork, but I want to focus on two very thought provoking pieces. The first is the walking man. Tall, slender, and mysterious, this man, though still for all of eternity, never ceases on his journey forward…but to what end? Where is this man walking so intently? Will he ever arrive at his destination; will he ever cease his search? What motivates him to walk in this way? His emotions are clouded: the artist does not reveal any expression on his face. Also interesting is the walking man’s slenderness, his fragility. Despite this, he soldiers on.20160303_175448

Related to the greater concept of life and purpose is this painting by the Dutch painter David Bailly entitled “Vanitas”. Aptly named, it speaks of the futility of wealth and vanity. Based on the imperial period in which it was created, a young slave/servant boy ponders the meaninglessness of his late master’s wealth. The fancy frills are so temporal, as life wilts like the flowers, and is easily snuffed out like a candle. The master’s picture, pointing to his skull, is a solemn reminder that life is short: too short to be wasted on the trivial things that money can buy. Relating this back to the man walking, what is the purpose that we as humans should strive for? It’s a question that everyone must answer.

20160303_182002

Let’s Eat Together!

Last week I attended a talk titled “Food and Religious Identity” by Professor David Freidenreich, which was a distillation of his book “Foreigners and Their Food: Constructing Otherness in Jewish, Christian, and Islamic Law”. Professor Freidenreich spoke about how religious communities have used food to create a sense of ‘us and them’ between their adherents and those outside the community. Why use food to do this? Food is an integral mode of fostering community and unity, as people sit around a table, they share life together, speak together, and get to know eachother. Therefore, keeping people from eating together fosters a sense of otherness.

In the Mosaic Law, God made it clear that the Jews were his chosen people, set apart from the nations, so it made sense to have food laws which emphasized this point. Deuteronomy 14:12 reads “you are a people holy to the Lord your God. Out of all the peoples on the face of the earth, the Lord has chosen you to be his treasured possession.” Some foods were clean, and others unclean, just as the Jews were chosen by God and other groups weren’t. That wasn’t the end of the story, though. God promised Abraham, the founding father of the Jews, that “through your offspring all nations on earth will be blessed, because you have obeyed me.” [Genesis 22:18]. Christians believe that this refers to Jesus of Nazareth, who was God’s son incarnate as a man, and died to take away the sins of the world which separate people from God, thereby restoring people’s broken relationship with God. Christianity is unique in its universality: Jesus’ sacrifice covers the sins of all who believe, and all have equal access to God. To illustrate this, the Apostle Peter received a vision where God commanded Him to eat all types of animals that were unclean by the Jewish Law, thus signifying that salvation was for all people, not just the Jews. Therefore, the early church taught a doctrine of openness and acceptance towards all peoples. In fact, the Apostle Paul wrote to the church in Galatia that “There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” [Galatians 3:28]

With this in mind, I found it remarkable that as time went on much of the church began to go back on this core value of openness by trying to create barriers between ‘Christian’ and ‘pagan’ through food. In particular, church authorities portrayed Jews as ‘anti-Christians’, so encouraged the consumption of foods that Jews were forbidden in the Mosaic Law to eat, such as pork. It seems like proponents of these ideals lost touch with some central doctrines of Christianity: that all are saved by grace apart from works, that salvation is for everyone who believes, and that Christians should be living to spread this good news and demonstrate a Christlike love to all who will hear. I find it encouraging that in recent times (particularly after WWII), the church as a whole has opened up to interfaith interaction, and now seeks to share life with those outside of itself. I hope that all embrace the dining table as a place of community in the midst of diversity. Let’s eat together!

A Season for Everything.

Last week I attended GRF Sara Schlemm’s talk about Melancholy. Sara began by relating to us the meaning and history of melancholy: more than just an emotionally sad state, melancholy has deeper roots in the psyche and physical body. It’s more of an outlook or disposition towards life. Melancholy was associated in the past with one of the four humors that were held in balance in the body: black bile. It was held that when you had an imbalance of black bile, you became melancholic. Melancholy was associated with the season of autumn, associated with the idea of a bleak outlook.

Personally, I struggle to see the point or use of melancholy. At this point in my life, I’m a pretty joyful guy. God has given me so much love, grace, and hope, so  the idea of moping around or being skeptical about life doesn’t make sense to me. When I get caught up with depressing circumstances and fall into that trend, I just remember the truth of who I am and who God is, and try to walk in light of it. Based on this, I think that life has the potential to be abundantly joyful for everyone. When I see a melancholic or sad person, I immediately think: “How can I fix this situation? How can I help this person cheer up?” However, I need to explore the idea that melancholy may not be the antithesis of joy. In fact, I suspect that melancholy can be used to strengthen the root of joy. I wonder how much my view of melancholy is shaped by current culture, which sees it as something that holds people back from enjoying life fully and reaching their full potential. In the past, however, melancholy was viewed as more than doom and gloom. Melancholy was associated with creative genius and a deeply contemplative mind. Ancient texts from eastern culture assert the importance of melancholy (held in balance with joy) as well. The third chapter of Solomon’s contemplative book Ecclesiastes starts like this:

There is a time for everything,
 and a season for every activity under the heavens:

     a time to be born and a time to die,
    a time to plant and a time to uproot,
     a time to kill and a time to heal,
    a time to tear down and a time to build,
    a time to weep and a time to laugh,
    a time to mourn and a time to dance,
    a time to scatter stones and a time to gather them,
    a time to embrace and a time to refrain from embracing,
    a time to search and a time to give up,
    a time to keep and a time to throw away,
    a time to tear and a time to mend,
    a time to be silent and a time to speak,
    a time to love and a time to hate,
    a time for war and a time for peace.

Perhaps melancholy has a place, even an essential place, in a healthy, full life.

Fostering Growth in Ithaca

On Wednesday I attended the Cafe Series, and heard Lisa Nicholas describe the city of Ithaca from an Urban planning perspective. I’ve never seen a city through this viewpoint, so it was an interesting and thought-provoking perspective. How do you create a city that honors the traditions and culture of the area, is sustainably designed, is pleasant and convenient to live in, and promotes growth? It’s not an easy task, but one that must be successfully completed for a city to grow and be healthy.

For example, Ithaca is filled with environmentally minded people, has good public transit, a nice park, and a welcoming, unique down-town. However, it’s population has been stagnant for the past 100 years or so. How to facilitate growth in the City without building huge apartment buildings that ruin its personal feel? The design of multi-use public areas could be a good choice for Ithaca, providing new residential space while facilitating commerce and community interaction. It remains to be seen whether this idea will take off, but it seems promising!

Personally, I’d be interested to explore ways to connect Ithaca with the Cornell and Ithaca College communities. Generally, I get the feeling that Cornell and downtown Ithaca are two very separate spheres, but with the potential for interaction. Both have fantastic places for people to connect and mingle: Ithaca’s beautiful pedestrian downtown and Cornell’s grassy quads. What steps can be taken to connect these communities? Maybe more advertisement of events such as the farmers market and chili fest, or promoting the public concerts at Bailey Hall?

Exploring Art!

Last week I went to the opening reception at the Johnson Museum, featuring the work of Matthew Schreiber, who works with a variety of mediums that manipulate light, most notably lasers and holograms. In a presentation where he spoke about his early years and inspiration for exploring this genre of art, he talked about using a variety of non-traditional artistic media, such as light, to create a certain mood or highlight various physical, philosophical, and spiritual realities. Experiencing his exhibit “Crossbow” was a real treat: a dark room filled with red lasers making a geometric pattern, I was able to experience the artwork in a way not allowed by traditional drawings, paintings, or photography. I was in the art itself, exploring it. Laser beams surrounded me, highlighting my skin and shining past my face.

Experiencing this made me think of other media which could be utilized for artistic expression, to communicate through other senses beside sight. Sculptures can be touched, music can be heard. What about smell? What medium could be utilized to speak to the nose? I realized that food is a fantastic art form. Truly experiencing a good meal incorporates all the senses: eyes see a tender steak, ears hear it sizzling on the grill, mouth smells the luscious aroma, tongue tastes the juicy cut, and who doesn’t like eating with their hands? Food is art that you can literally consume; art that becomes part of your own body! I don’t cook much (Cornell dining takes good care of my stomach), but I look forward to experimenting with this delightful art medium in the future.

image courtesy of http://www.vogtgallery.com/index.php?/artists1/matthew-schreiber/