In Part II of Dark Princess, Matthew replies to the minister: “Yes, yes, all that; but not simply that. Fear; the hushing of loose slander and insult; the curbing of easy proposals to deprive us of things deeper than life. They look out for the Indian’s war whoop (war cry), the Italian’s knife, the Irishman’s club; what else appeals to barbarians but force, blood, war?” (Du Bois 49)
Through the conversation between Matthew and the minister, Du Bois explores the necessity of violence in the revolution on the color line. Matthew imagines the possibility of blowing up the Ku Klux Clan convention as a response to oppression and lynching. Sensing the closing space of African Americans, he believes in immediate actions that abolish the European and American imperialism. The minister and Matthew use definitive terms to label each other’s ideology: the minister calls Matthew’s proposal bloody revenge and renders his political vision irrational, whereas Matthew thinks that the minister’s indecisiveness represents his fear. In this passage, Du Bois employs juxtaposition to stress the intensity of control imposed on ethnic groups such as Native Americans, Italians and Irish people. Additionally, Du Bois represents each ethnic group with their unique characteristics (such as club for Irish people), suggesting that White imperialists will actively seek to eliminate the subjectivity of minorities. The minister continues to describe Matthew using emotional terms such as “morbid” and “impatient,” dismissing his urge for revolution as untimely concerns.
Matthew’s belief in reconstructing the racial hierarchy parallels with Du Bois’ speech “To the Nations of the World,” where he called “let the world take no backward step in that slow but sure progress which has successively refused to let the spirit of…a striving human soul.” (Du Bois 1) The idealistic characteristic of Matthew hints that Du Bois himself longs for swift and fundamental changes in racial dynamics. Additionally, Matthew’s frustration with how the minister uses Christ to justify passivity also suggests Du Bois’ dissatisfaction with Western religions. Similar to Du Bois’ argument that reliance on faith does not cloak exploitation, Matthew hints that the minister uses his religion to hide an unwillingness to change.
Sherrie Chen (sc2289)