Third World Women’s Alliance Security Committee. Third World Women’s Alliance Security Protocol.
The Third World Women’s Alliance (TWWA) Security Protocol outlines the actions that members of the TWWA must take not only for the organization’s safety and success but also for their own individual safety. The piece is undated but its content aligns with the concerns of radical political organizing in the 1960s and 1970s. Essentially, it calls for members of the TWWA to avoid “petty bourgeois traits” to prevent the sharing of dangerous information in settings where members are possibly under surveillance and to prevent members from being manipulated into disclosing confidential information to government agents.
To better understand this piece, it is necessary to understand who the TWWA were. Founded in 1971, the TWWA originated as the Women’s Liberation Committee under the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), a major Civil Rights organization founded in the 1960s. This New York-based group later broke away from SNCC. Despite its goal of international solidarity and liberation, the TWWA focused on women of color in the United States. The TWWA sought to liberate all marginalized communities by demonstrating the connections between “racism, economic exploitation, and sexual oppression,” aiming to create a socialist society where these issues would be addressed and overcome (Aguiar 2192).
The Security Protocol expresses that the TWAA’s work is inherently radical and oppositional to the U.S. government, and that by being a member of the TWWA, one is at risk of being surveilled by the government and losing their rights due to their participation in radical organizing. To keep both members and the organization safe, the Security Committee of the TWWA lists four “petty bourgeois traits” that members should try to “cleanse” themselves of: egotism, subjectivity, individualism, and liberalism.
Egotism in this context refers to bragging about one’s position or even membership in the TWWA. While the Security Committee does not want people to disclose information about who leaders are, how many people are in the group, how the group is structured, etc., they also do not want the TWWA to be totally clandestine to the point where their work is invisible and they cannot recruit new members. Rather than bragging about the organization, the TWWA asks members to talk about the organization’s newspaper, their meetings, and their position on workers.
Subjectivity refers to reacting emotionally when provoked. The Security Committee urges members to respond to situations in a measured way that does not give away too much information about the TWWA and does not affect the TWWA’s public image. This section suggests that members may be provoked by government agents to inadvertently and rashly provide confidential or dangerous information.
The Security Committee urges TWWA members to dismiss individualism, which they use to refer to sharing information with family and friends who are not a part of TWWA. Just because members may trust loved ones does not mean that loved ones will not make mistakes and share information, or these trusted loved ones may themselves be government agents. The Security Committee believes that for everyone’s safety, it is most prudent to not share information with non-TWWA members.
Liberalism refers to being lenient when encountering behavior that is potentially dangerous to the TWWA. For example, the Security Committee asks that TWWA members report other members who express counter-revolutionary sentiments and suggests that by not filing a report, one is just as guilty as the person who expressed the counter-revolutionary sentiments. Dissension among the ranks is dangerous to the cause.
This piece is interesting because it reflects that the TWWA was highly organized and had radical goals. It may seem like a stretch to say that members could be in danger of losing their personal rights if caught by the government, but in that time period, government surveillance and reprimand were strong because powerful movements such as the Civil Rights Movement were threatening the status quo via revolutionary change. Despite the power of the TWWA suggested by this Security Protocol for members, it is interesting that the TWWA and its achievements are not more well known today. This piece also calls into question the efficacy of the TWWA’s international organizing efforts given that members were advised not to communicate via telephone due to wiretapping, but all methods of communication except secure in-person conversations were subject to surveillance. How did the TWWA organize internationally if their communications were likely to be surveilled? Thus, despite striving for international liberation, this Security Protocol implies that the most immediate focus of the TWWA was on liberation and empowerment of women of color within the United States, which perhaps in turn would set the stage for the liberation and empowerment of women of color internationally.
Additional work cited:
Aguiar, Marian. “Third World Women’s Alliance.” Encyclopedia of African-American Culture and History, edited by Colin A. Palmer, 2nd ed., vol. 5, Macmillan Reference USA, 2006, pp. 2191-2192. Gale eBooks, https://link-gale-com.proxy.library.cornell.edu/apps/doc/CX3444701222/GVRL?u=cornell&sid=GVRL&xid=07a168f1. Accessed 29 Sept. 2019.