Get thee to a showing of this performance

Last Thursday, I had a great time watching the filming of Hamlet from the National Theatre in London. I never actually read or watched Hamlet before this, despite having read Macbeth three times throughout middle and high school. Nevertheless, I was going into this knowing very little about Hamlet. I knew about the “to be or not to be” soliloquy and had a vague understanding that The Lion King was Hamlet-esque, but I really enjoyed the performance because it was super engaging, especially because I did not know exactly what was going to happen. I found myself rooting for Hamlet, though I knew he was going to die, because it is, after all, a Shakespearean tragedy. I didn’t realize how often Hamlet gets referenced by other things, as I was often surprised by famous lines that I never knew were attributed to Hamlet. I definitely want to go through and actually read the play to catch more nuances, but I do think watching Shakespeare is more enjoyable than just reading it. I think if anyone doesn’t understand the appeal of Shakespeare, they should find a chance to watch this performance.

One thing I was really impressed by was the staging. It was amazing. The play opened with the small space in front of a backdrop, and I was shocked by how big it was once the scene changed. The front area looked like a normal sized stage, but the back part was a pitched hallway. I’m not sure how steep the incline was, but seeing the actors running up it seemed like hard work, and when Ophelia walked to the back and into the bright light in the distance, it looked pretty steep. Also, the stage effects for the closing of the scene right before intermission were awesome. Like actually awe inspiring. I wasn’t sure exactly what was being blown around, but I did wonder about how they were going to clean up all of it during the intermission. Turns out, they didn’t have to. It created the perfect outdoor setting for the later scenes. I really liked how they used the set very smartly throughout the entire show.

At first, I was confused by the costuming because of the mixture of more period appropriate pieces and plaid with hipster glasses, but it didn’t seem to detract from the performance. Actually, when Hamlet came out with a David Bowie t-shirt, it oddly fit the really well. I wasn’t too fond of Ophelia’s clothing, but being one of the only major female roles, perhaps it was just too different from the rest of the costumes to make sense to me. I’m not sure how it was originally written, but seeing Benedict Cumberbatch in a toy soldier outfit marching and playing in a kid’s castle was great.

Another thing I appreciated was the camerawork. I was afraid that it was going to be a stationary taping of the whole stage, which some theaters do, but the camera changes added to the performance. Focusing in on certain character’s actions and reactions helped direct the audience to exactly what was supposed to be featured. Also, it probably was a better point of view than it would have been from a live audience perspective because certain isolated scenes could be zoomed in on so the characters didn’t seem too small, which I would imagine they might on such a big stage.

I do enjoy reading Shakespeare, but I think watching it provides a better experience, because they were written to be played. Going into it without having read the play, I was really excited by certain parts, but I would definitely watch this version again after reading it to try and catch different parts that may have gone over my head.

Factology of the situation

Last Monday, I got the opportunity to see a screening of the documentary Rubble Kings. Before the film started, Mayor Svante Myrick dedicated October 26th in Ithaca to honor Afrika Bambaataa who has made global cultural contributions as well as his donations to Cornell’s Library Hip Hop Collection. I didn’t even know we had one, but I’m sure tour guides will point out that Cornell now houses one of the largest collections of historical hip hop music.

The documentary itself revealed lots of information I had no prior exposure to. Before, when I thought of gangs in New York, I thought of Leonarda DiCaprio and Daniel Day-Lewis in the 19th century. This documentary started off by explaining the gang situation in the 20th century and how apathy for people living in especially the Bronx led to gang rule of the area. It was crazy to hear about so many different gangs. It would seem like if there were that many, you couldn’t really go anywhere too far from your front door without getting beat up because of the name you wore on your back. What was interesting that I also didn’t know was that there typically weren’t Puerto Ricans and Black people in the same gang.

The style of the documentary was unique. When prior gang members talked about stories that were undocumented, comic-styled depictions were interlaced. Speaking of documentation, I was very surprised by the amount of documentation there was of gang activity. In one scene, a gang was beating up someone from another gang and the camera was just a few yards away from the violence, held steadily. There were also videos of the gangs messing with rubble and initiating new members. It really made me wonder why they were doing this. Why were they filming their gang activity?

Another seemingly odd thing they did was make music. The Ghetto Brothers made an album and I realized just how much they were being ignored by the rest of society. The gangs were clearly dominant in the area and were well known among their own community that the leaders of one could release a music album. I would think this would be a perfect lead for police looking into gang activity, but they clearly didn’t bother to deal with the neighborhoods. Also, it was interesting to think about how they could afford to do all of this. It seems like they spent all of their time fighting against each other, that I don’t know how they could afford their jean jackets and recording equipment. While the film showed a lot, I still have unanswered questions.

The Ghetto Brothers became focused on peace and community activism; so after their peace counselor was killed, they gathered a meeting to put an end to the gang violence, because it had gone too far. Quickly, the gangs shed their borders and people across the Bronx intermingled and hip hop was born. It was interesting to see how the death of one, clearly influential community figure, changed the culture of an area. The gang-riddled areas just became a place of shared creativity and a new culture was created.

After the documentary, there was a panel open to audience questions.

RubbleKings

The panelists were Shan Nicolson, the director, Lorraine Montenegro, of United Bronx Parents, Luvelle Brown, the Ithaca District superintendent, and Afrika Bambaataa. The panel really brought out the different personalities of the panelists. The director was clearly interested in the film’s content, talking about how he personally came to learn about the origins of hip hop. Lorraine was clearly a strong female who had accomplished much to help the lives of many. She had worked with many kids from the ghetto and was always a believer that “there ain’t nothing you can’t do.” The superintendent seemed like an odd choice for a panelist, but he brought his own experiences growing up in rural Virginia and compared them to similarities with gang violence in the documentary. He also made some jokes after reassuring the audience that his statements were in no way a reflection of Ithaca’s schools. Afrika Bambaataa was also a very interesting speaker. He talked multiple times about his strong belief in factology – about the real facts behind everything. I vaguely remember him saying (correct me if I’m wrong) that saying Columbus discovered America would be like if he walked into your house and said that he discovered it. He was clearly a man who thought long and hard about many different aspects of our world, and I’m glad Cornell invited him to be a visiting scholar.

Overall, factology was the point of the documentary – to get an important story out there. I’m sure many of us learned about the Harlem Renaissance and its cultural significance, but hip hop culture seems to be not as relevant or worthy of scholar study, despite its rich and interesting history. The director said that there was still more to be told, and I would definitely be interested in learning more about a story I didn’t know about more than a week ago.