At the final Becker/Rose Cafe series, I met three members of the Cornell Food & Brand Lab, a research division of the University that studies eating patterns and how to subtly shift those patterns towards making healthier choices. I remember from last year’s events that there was a talk about branding patterns in yogurt marketing, and I expected this talk to be pretty similar, but I actually liked this one much more.
The researchers told us about experiments they conduct in order to see how people choose to eat what they do, specifically at buffets and such, and found that when buffets (not unlike those at house dinner) are organized such that the healthier items come first, patrons are more likely to fill their plate up with healthier foods before getting to the high calorie main courses. And when people are given the choice between two different vegetables, they’re more likely to eat their choice rather than eat the vegetables on their own.
Personally, I don’t entirely feel the effect of the branding techniques. I consider myself very aware of what I put on my plate, and very aware of my eating patterns. Not in a bad way, but I make an effort to represent all food groups at every meal, cut down on carbs as much as I can, have a salad every day, etc. So I don’t know how the experiments done in the branding lab would work on me. But, I do see people in the dining hall every day, grabbing pizza, pasta, breadsticks and a cookie, all on the same plate and that’s dinner, which I find ridiculous. Some people coast through the dining hall and pick up only what they want, which of course would be the unhealthier, taste-goodier options. To some extent I think the kinds of psychological trickery these guys are researching could benefit these kinds of people, making their unconscious decisions for them. I don’t want to sound like a jerk, but I also don’t think anyone is mean enough to criticize another person’s bad eating habits directly, so if we can change people without them knowing it, that’s the best plan yet.
Their studies sound extremely interesting. However, I disagree that people that eat unhealthily should be intentionally subconsciously motivated towards eating healthier. I don’t think this is a sustainable solution for changing peoples’ diets for the better in the long-term. While their meals might be more nutritious while they’re eating at this place that uses psychology to make them eat healthier, once they move on from there they’ll most likely revert to eating what they would normally go for. I feel like this solution places a temporary band-aid over the real issue of a lack of education. I think more efforts should go towards educating people about nutrition and healthy lifestyles, which they can then go on to teach their children and families, creating a more sustainable and widespread solution to unhealthy eating.
I think the middle group between the poster and Seren’s comment is probably the right place. The education of making food-healthy choices is very important as we are all going to end up at some point completely in control of our diets.
The psychology to make our impulses work for us can also be helpful. Like the presenters said, we already make a lot of hard choices everyday. The stress of college can drive us towards quick meals and comfort food. The dining halls should be set to drive us to healthy choices.
However it is important to remember that if we try to limit choices by taking away unhealthy options, it will cause a huge backlash.