As a biology major, I really, really enjoyed professor Harvell’s talk at this week’s Becker/Rose Cafe. With nothing but glass figurines as her guide, she travelled the world in hopes of identifying the organisms that served as models for Cornell’s breath-taking Blaschka glass collection, and learning more about the changes in marine biodiversity over the last century.

Professor Harvell also spoke a great deal about her efforts to identify the pathogen currently ravaging sea star populations up and down the west coast, which raised some good questions about our part in wildlife conservation.

It was suggested by a fellow student that perhaps it iss not our place to interfere with the plight of the sea stars, and the more I think about it, the more I think I agree with him. I have a feeling people are going to eat me alive for saying that, so let me clarify: The fact of the matter is that species have come and gone long before humans evolved on this Earth, and I’d venture to say that Mother Nature has been doing a pretty good job. Fighting against natural selection is an incredible uphill battle, and I think conservation efforts can turn into a money pit very, very quickly.

Let it be known that I am NOT saying that we should continue dumping raw sewage into the oceans, hunting endangered animals, and cutting down the rainforests – shame on us for letting that happen in the first place. If wildlife is suffering as a direct result of our actions, I believe we are obligated to to try to remedy the situation. BUT, while a noble thought, it’s very naïve to believe that we can save every animal, regardless of the source of their plight. As hard as it is, we need to pick our battles.

Let me know what you guys think, and, in the meantime, please enjoy this adorable picture of a nudibranch.

You’re welcome.