The Super Bowl and American Society

As someone who doesn’t watch football, and barely understands it, I typically end up watching the game more for the advertisements than anything else. This year in particular I found that the Super Bowl provided a platform for political messages, and thus proved to be a very potent indicator of the current American sociopolitical climate. In this way, an event as essentially American as the Super Bowl can serve as a window into the ethos of our society.

Prior to the start of the game, there was a discussion about the cost of advertisements and general decline in viewership of the Super Bowl in recent years. In terms of viewership, it seems quite plausible that the progression of modern society has played a role in decreasing attention spans and encouraging individuals to check scores or video highlights the day after rather than watching the game real time. This also speaks to the declining social component of American life, as technology renders many forms of face to face interactions unnecessary and often discourages social gatherings. On the topic of advertisements, those found during the Super Bowl are often extravagant, and in past years have relied more on shock value than entertainment. This year, however, I found the sheer volume of political messages astounding. As a result of the last election, politics has come to the center of American media in a way it hasn’t for many years. This was incredibly visible in these advertisements, as even private companies feel both a. strongly enough about the current political situation to present an opinion, and b. that presenting this opinion is still relevant and accessible to the average viewer. Specifically, advertisements such as those for Budweiser, Coca Cola, and 84 Lumber presented potent imagery in response to the current immigration controversy. While this essentially differs from the expectation of the Super Bowl as a purely social and entertainment-oriented event, it is evident that this American tradition is just as much at the mercy of the current political atmosphere as anything else. In fact, it seems quite appropriate that these messages of unity were presented using the platform of an event which at its core represents both camaraderie and Americanism.

Anticipation for Super Bowl Ads

This past Sunday I attended the “Football, Marketing, and Money” Rose scholars event to watch the super bowl and analyze the advertisements.  I came into the event in anticipation of a great football game between two great teams that would be complimented with some great advertisement commercials.  However, while the game was great, the ads fell short in my opinion.  In fact, I personally think that the ads have been on the decline the last few years in terms of recall from viewers.

In other words, the ads don’t seem to be memorable as of late.  Statistics from the recall rate of viewers of these adds were just 29-39% depending on the add.  As a company, I think a successful recall rate would be over 50%.  At the same time, the cost per ad for just 30 seconds has been on a steady rise.  Back in 2002, the cost for such an add was $2.3 million.  Flash forward 15 years, commercials of just 30 seconds cost a company $5 million.

I believe that such an investment is important for many companies due to the strong viewership of the Super Bowl.  However, I think these same companies need to spend more time on their marketing capabilities in order to make their commercials more memorable and thus lead to more commerce in their company.  Also being from the Atlanta area, I was a little sad to see the hometown lose; however, there’s nothing you can do when the clutch Patriots do what they did so late in the game.

Standing out in the stack

The cover letter workshop tonight with House Fellow Cynthia Hill and GRF Shiv was one of the most helpful Rose Scholars events I have been to so far.  I liked how it included a discussion at the beginning about the most important aspects of a resume and a cover letter and then transitioned into a more one-on-one format where Cynthia and Shiv answered individual questions and gave comments on cover letters.

Cynthia had some great advice on ways to make my cover letter more appealing to employers: say something exciting/unique about you at the very beginning to draw them in, shorten descriptions of past experiences so that they do not get bored reading through them, and make it clear what you can offer them, not just what you hope to gain. I also had an interesting conversation with Shiv, who is currently a PhD student in biomedical engineering, about his thoughts on applying to labs, medical school, and MD-PhD programs.

I left tonight’s event feeling a lot more confident about how I can improve my cover letter so that I have a better chance of getting an interview when I apply to internships and jobs in the future. It also gave me a lot to think about in terms of my next steps after graduation.

Great Insight of Cover Letters Writing and Resume

I was excited to participate in the The Secret Behind the Cover Letter seminar by GRF Shivem on Thursday night. I have had some good experience writing resumes for finance jobs but kinds wrote my cover letters in very amateur way. We started off the seminar by discussing some crucial components of a effective resume: grades, courses, activities, professional experiences, clubs, skills, languages, software skills, etc. (there are general structure that would apply to most jobs but each industry requires specific features to it) For my finance resume, I think the most important parts are grades, courses, internship experience and leadership roles. Something important is to try to tailor everything on your resume to the specific job you are applying. For example, my general resume has a line of Software Training with items such as Microsoft Suite. But when I submit it to a bank, I changed the name to Financial Training, because software such as Excel is very crucial in many finance jobs and it is a popular skill to put on.

I was also happy to meet some other fellow Rose Scholars with various career interest. The people I sat close to are mostly interested in medical school and biology research. So it was interesting to listen to the different path they are taking to get the dream research. For me, to stand out in many candidates that seek a banking internship, I need to have high grades, relevant courses, good internships, and club leadership experiences. But it seems that medical schools are looking more at grants, fellowship, and past research experience, which are very interesting to me because these are things that I have never done before. I am in the processing of deciding whether or not to write a thesis for my economics degree, so right now I am very curious of everything about research and writing papers (let me know if you have any suggestions / advice:).

It is a snowing today and I felt fulfilled to come to this relaxing yet very educational seminar.  Good luck to everything in the process of applying!

Is it really worth spending 5 million dollars on a Super bowl advertisement?

Last Sunday I attended a discussion about the Super bowl, which made me think about the marketing and advertising of the Super bowl.  Most international students understand the important role that sports play in American culture. Since, more often than not every country has a sport that majority of the country’s population follows and identifies with. Therefore, the importance of the football in American culture is similar to all other nations in the world. The Super bowl is the most significant football event of the year. However, something that baffles many international students including myself is the amount of money a super bowl advertisement is worth. Is it really worth spending 5 million (or more) on a 30 second spot?

The super bowl reaches an audience of approximately 110 million viewers. The biggest cinematic blockbuster from 2016, Rogue One, only sold about 55 million tickets. In terms of cultural reach, football’s championship game is twice the size of the biggest blockbuster. Therefore, maybe it is worth it to spend $5 million on a 30 second spot. However, this does not benefit all companies that advertise during the super bowl. Personally, I would argue that new companies and products that people haven’t heard of before would get the most return on the $5 million dollar investment, because millions of people are hearing about them for the first time.

However, if a reputed company uses the Super bowl to advertise their current products and services this would not provide them a good return on their investment since millions of people watching the Super bowl have already heard and seen their brand promotions before. Thus, the $ 5 million dollar investment would not benefit the firms that already have a certain reputation and stature.

The Super bowl’s remarkable reach definitely benefits the new companies and products that are advertising for the first time since it allows you to reach such a large proportion of America’s population. Yet for established brands and firms the Super bowl is not worth spending $5 million dollars on in the long run. Therefore, it is only worth spending $5 million dollars if you’re a company that’s never been heard of before, if you’re an established brand it is not worth spending $5 million.

 

Marketing + Football

On Feb. 5, I attended “Football, Marketing, and Money.” The group conversation was particularly insightful for me personally, as I don’t follow football. So, although I knew about Fantasy Football, I didn’t realize how big the business actually is. Fantasy Football was brought up as a possible contributing factor in the decline of football viewership. Someone made a very interesting point about how maybe another reason viewership is declining is because culture is changing – the communal aspect, particularly. As a result, in general, maybe  people aren’t really gathering in big groups anymore, as humans tend to seem more isolated (physically) because of technology.

 

Personally, I don’t watch football because I never grew up around it. So, as viewership continues to decline, I wonder how that will impact the future growth of the NFL. Additionally, it’s going to be interesting to see how the NFL combats the issue of declining viewership through marketing. Because, in the long run, if revenue decreases, salary of players may decrease, possibly influencing the talent that comes in, as some athletes may be turned off by football and pursue other sports.

Women Unite, A discussion on Moving Forward

On Monday I attending the table talk: Women Unite! that discussed the marches around the world the day after the inauguration. Two of the GRF’s who were leading the discussion both attended the march in Washington D.C. and were able to give us an idea of the feel of the march and their feelings after the march. Those who attended the march described it as a great experience that helped them feel empowered and have a sense of control in our current political climate. We were all shocked by the number of people who ended up attending the marches. I knew the event was going to be big, but I never realized that millions of people across the world would join. It is amazing how people can really mobilize when we start to realize the threats we are up against.

Throughout the talk we discussed feminism in a broader scope. For me, feminism has to be intersectional to be considered feminism. If you aren’t fighting against racism, ableism, transphobia, homophobia, and Islamaphobia when you are fighting for feminism, who are you fighting for? We also discussed the role of conservative women in feminism. We were very divided on this topic, as some at the table believed that liberal women should offer to include conservative women into the movement. Others, including myself, felt like they should try to join through their own means.

As a Maryland resident, I really wish I had gone to the march. I’m very interested in politics, now more than ever, and feel like the march would feel like a great space to vent out frustration and anger. We ended the discussion by slow clapping it out, which seemed like a really great way to finalize an empowering conversation with motivated people.

Women’s March or Anti-Trump Protest?

I went to the table talk: Women Unite! It provided for a very interesting discussion to hear from the GRFs about their experiences in the women’s march. I thought it was particularly intriguing to hear about how there were so many people there for reasons other than just women’s rights. When it came up that there were even people in the march who voted for Trump, it seemed hypocritical to at least a few of the students in the discussion. This did seem strange, considering the march essentially acted as an anti-Trump protest. However, it could have been that the Trump supporters either regretted their votes or thought Trump was the lesser of two evils at the time, so to speak.

One thing seemed clear to me by the end of the discussion. The women’s march in Washington was not just a women’s march, but instead more broad in nature. It was basically a protest against the divisive campaign that Trump ran. It was a protest against the various things Trump had said about women, minorities, the LGBT community, etc. I believe peaceful protests are really good and serve a purpose. However, the talk made me also want to consider the alternate ways in which one can actively make a difference in politics. One piece of useful info I picked up in relation to this was that you can call your representative!

Marching to the Beat of Injustice

Monday’s talk about the Women’s March was very interesting. There were many different opinions about the importance of the march and what it accomplished. This year’s march was the largest in the history of the Women’s March. So many different movements came together to stand up for their various causes. Although I did not attend the Women’s March, what I gathered from others at the table was that there was a sense of unity and strength during the March. Personally, I sometimes feel that marches do not accomplish much because people come and rally and then just go home and do nothing. It seems more like an opportunity to post a hastag photo on social media rather than a call to action. One thing that kept coming up at the table talk was the fact that since there are so many different groups and movements and ideas, it seems like even in unity, there is still some division. According to one of the GRFs, there were some Trump supporters at the women’s march and that puzzled some at the table. However, is it right to exclude conservative women because of their views of what it means to be a “woman?” How do we bridge the gap between conservative women and more liberal women or do we just exsist in opposition? Many of these questions came up during the table talk and ultimately there are some questions which are hard to answer. One thing that we do agree on is for people to stay active. Call your state’s representative, petition, boycott, and educate other people on what is happening and keep having conversations until there is change in legislature. At the end of the day, we can march to Timbucktu but if that’s where the action ends, nothing will change much.

For or Against?

On Monday evening, I went to the Table Talk where we discussed the our views on the Women’s March. Since I am from DC, I was able to attend the Women’s March on Washington before I came back to Cornell, and it is an experience I will never forget. Everyone came to the March for a slightly different reason – some for immigrant rights, some opposed to Trump’s views on environmental protection, some for women’s rights, some for LGBTQ rights, the list goes on. However, people marched together, raised their posters up together, and chanted together, recognizing the intersectionality of the causes they were fighting for. Protestors ranged from toddlers to grandparents and it was incredible to see hundreds of thousands of people fighting back against the hateful language and threats that Trump used throughout the campaign to insult so many groups of people.

We had an interesting discussion about how people who voted for Trump were at the March. On one hand, what right do these people have to be at a protest against Trump’s hateful rhetoric and plans for his presidency, when they are part of the reason he is in power and able to follow through with these plans? How can you vote for someone if you are against what they stand for?  Were these people uninformed when they cast their ballots and have since reconsidered their position? And if so, how can you not take your vote seriously? Or did they vote for Trump and never expect he would win? It is hard to understand why these people voted the way they did and decided to march; however, doesn’t everyone have a right to march for something they believe in, no matter how they cast their ballot? These are tough questions to answer, and I go back and forth about how I feel. I hope to hear your thoughts!

The Women’s March, Inclusive Feminism, Intersectionality, and well, My Skepticism

I attended the Table Talk on the Women’s March on Monday, and it was cool to see many different points and opinions by the other Rose Scholars and GRFs. I think all the comments are valid and valuable, even if I didn’t agree with some of them. Here are just a few of my thoughts after the talk, and a thing that I wish had come up in conversation (but hadn’t–but I don’t really blame the conversation, it was something that’s harder to bring up).

So… the women’s march. I won’t deny its impact on a lot of women who went, and I won’t deny its impact on the fact that it is the largest organized march in history, but I will say that I am skeptical on the idea of ‘inclusive feminism” and intersectionality behind the women’s march. I’m definitely impressed with the turnout and the overall message (“we won’t back down/we stand together/solidarity/etc.”), and I’ll be the first to say that it was definitely very powerful… but I’m skeptical about the future. White feminism is pretty rooted in our history and there were definitely anecdotes from women of color/LGBTQ+ identifying women who felt that there were people at the march who invalidated their existence.

At the table talk, it was mentioned that everyone who went had different reasons for going, whether it was to celebrate an identity or to fight for a friend or a loved one who was affected by the insane executive orders or Trump’s damaging and alienating words. But, it’s actually not that big of a secret that some women went to the women’s march because it was “cool.” To them, it was a just something to do because they were bored, not because the march held any significance for them. There’s a particularly heartbreaking story circulating around on social media as an indigenous woman recounts her experience at the women’s march. She was approached by white feminists who asked if she was a real human, who took pictures of her and her group (they were wearing regalia), who casually (and insensitively) said, “Guess we’re Indians today!” while marching alongside the group (and then proceeded to get offended when the group of indigenous woman said “We don’t get to choose if we’re native or not. This is our reality & you are not Indian. You are disrespectful & need to go.“)

It’s not a particularly well known fact, but Susan B. Anthony, an activist who played a large role in the women’s suffrage movement, employed some strategic racism to achieve her goals. She was an opponent of the 15th amendment (which granted all black men the right to vote), and quite casually “climbed” on the backs of people of color to achieve her goals. Moving forward, what evidence is there for us to believe that something like that won’t happen again?

A lot of women of color have critiqued the women’s march, asking questions like why it took white women so long to rally together–where were they at black lives matter marches, and where are they in the fight against DAPL? Moreover… why were BLM marches considered “divisive” while the women’s march was considered more “virtuous”? People cited low arrest numbers–but were they that way because of the message behind the march, or a different method of policing entirely because of who went to the marches?

Moving forward… I just wonder if this is a one time thing. I just wonder if women of color are always going to be seen as “lesser,” their causes less virtuous and existence a burden. There is power in the march, sure, but will this be the one time that women from all walks of life come together? Or will women of color/people of color/minorities/LGBTQ+ identifying people continue to fight the hard fight alone? Remember that the majority of white women voted for Donald Trump. In the past, white women climbed on the backs of people of color in order to achieve their goals. Of course, I hope with every fiber of my being that this is a step towards a good direction and that we will all come together and work towards a better world. But, at the same time. I don’t think I’m wrong in being just a bit skeptical.