Today at professor Roberts’ talk about political divides, it reminded me a great deal of my background before coming to Cornell and the back and forth I participated in back in high school. Back in my hometown, I took a lot of political theory and political science classes. In one of these classes, we had a strong partisan divide, representative of the county I lived in. In the 2016 election, Suffolk County voted 55%-45% in favor of Trump and when he won the election, people came into class with Trump banners and celebrated the next day, yet, just as many came in crying. Leading up to, and for months after, the election, the class had two extremely strong democratic and two even stronger republican viewpoints constantly duking it out in class. Their debates would get so fiery that they eventually had such a disparity in views that they started attacking each other in class for non-political reasons. I hope to learn how to bridge their ever-increasingly radical viewpoints to come to a moderate compromise and prevent this extremely superfluous, uncalled for conflict.
With this lack of cohesiveness in my past political settings, I am still not used to the idea of everyone having such a similar, liberal perspective on life and politics here at Cornell. With the lack of conflicting views marking a lack of differentiation and political conflict on campus, I found it so interesting that such a small percentage of people here have not experienced the world I did back in high school. While I believe in a healthy political debate, the ability to have a much more controlled environment with such a homogeneous population has its vast amount of benefits too. Whenever I notice political debate and forum in my classes, they end as quickly as they begin, with near-complete agreement on the idea of increased diversity, healthcare and other liberal policies needed to be further incorporated.