The contradiction between intentions and outcomes

Dr. Strangelove is known for its satirical take on Cold War age fears of nuclear warfare, and is consistently ranked on lists of top comedies. However, beyond its comedic and historical value, Dr. Strangelove speaks to human error in negotiation and how multiple parties use unreasonable tactics to achieve their goals.

The Soviet Union’s doomsday device is a classic example of bringing forward an undesirable end. Instead of focusing on the Soviet Union’s own interests, the initiative behind the doomsday device focuses on retaliation. Instead of peace, the U.S and the Soviet Union are shown to focus on increasing levels of aggression, undermining each party’s wishes and exacerbating the issue. Sometimes, seeking to avoid an undesirable outcome brings about that very outcome.

Warfare causes groups of people to view each other as separate and non-human, leading them to discard any possibility of similarity, understanding, and reconciliation. Ripper embodies this notion through his belief that the Soviets are polluting the precious bodily fluids of Americans. This kind of dehumanization and separation of the self and other has been witnessed across the pages of history in genocide, imperialism, and racial tension. It is only by working together and understanding each other that numerous goals can be achieved together.

 

One thought on “The contradiction between intentions and outcomes

  1. I agree completely. People often wonder how a regime like the Nazis could have started — where a group of people wanted to take over the entire world. Well I see the semblance of that within the US right now. People are so worried for our own safety that many would be fine if we conquered the world ourselves in order to protect ourselves, promote our interpretation of peace. Is that not so different than what the Nazis wanted?