Tonight’s Rose Café featured the Ithaca City judge. It was interesting to have a some-what informal discussion with someone who you would normally see on the bench wearing a robe. The judge talked about some of his experiences as a defense attorney and now as a judge in a state criminal court. He also discussed the effects of judicial elections on the independence of the judiciary.

At the end of his talk he said that his court is in session on Wednesdays and Fridays. I would be interested in attending because I have never witnessed proceedings in a criminal court. Last year, I observed oral arguments at the United States Supreme Court and was fascinated by the process. I was not familiar with much of the legal nuances that were debated, but I enjoyed hearing all the Justices except one ask thoughtful and pointed questions of lawyers. I was also amazed by the lawyers’ ability to quickly respond and cite relevant cases, amicus curiae briefs, and exhibits as if the information was written on the back of their hand. I was also surprised by Justice Thomas, he appeared to take a nap during the arguments, but he might have just been closing his eyes and sitting still.

Last year I received a summons to be on a grand jury. The jury would have meet once a week for a number of months. I was probably one of the few who was excited to receive such a notice because I would have enjoyed learning about the system from a new perspective. I had to write to the court and let them know that I could not serve on the jury because I go to school in Ithaca which is far away from Trenton were the courthouse is. I’m sure I will have another opportunities to have jury duty.

I also appreciated hearing the Judge’s perspective on sentencing. He mentioned the deliberation and psychological impact of sentencing a person to incarceration. I cannot imagine having that type of power over another individual. I fully understand why the judge would say sentencing is the most difficult aspect of his job.