The history of nutrition

I was interested in attending this Rose Cafe because I love history and was intrigued by the topic. I am not terribly knowledgable about the Great Depression in general, and I had certainly never considered it through the lens of nutrition and public health. Going into it, I had seen the photos of bread lines and was aware in general that the Great Depression greatly affected the ability of many to afford sufficient food, but I was not aware of the responses to that crisis and how they affected the way we think about nutrition today. Ziegelman pointed out that much of the malnutrition crisis was addressed in the emerging field of home economics and that the research done by home economists drew heavily on biology and chemistry to come to practical solutions. The goal was to find recipes and food sources that were both cheap and nutritious and to educate the public about the importance of proper nutrition. The research conducted had a lasting impact by making people more informed about the foods they eat and the affects it has on their bodies.

I was most interested in the point she made connecting the home economics movement to improve nutrition with that of the temperance movement. The diets proposed to combat malnutrition were bland and simple. I would have guessed that this was merely because when faced with a food crisis, taste can no longer be the priority, but Ziegelman pointed out that this bland, simple food also was a product of temperance ideals which saw excessive pleasure as harmful. I think much of this utilitarian mindset surrounding food continues in many ways in American culture today. As was mentioned in the talk, the most notable holdover from this mindset is the fact that many people eat on the go or only sit down to eat for a very short time. Ours is not a culture of long, drawn out meals. Additionally, this point reminded me of all of the times my not American friends have poked fun at American foods, especially for having no spice or flavor. I had never considered the historical precedent for why American foods seem bland to some and Ziegelman’s Rose Cafe offered some potential insight into this!

If it tastes good it’s good for you, right?

The Rose Cafe talk by Dr. Ziegelman last week was about the diets of those living in the USA during the Great Depression. She discussed her book “A Square Meal” which is about the very simple, and very reductionist, recipes that Americans in food pantries and kitchens put themselves through. Many of these “square meals” were lacking in flavor and some staple ingredients like butter.

One of the consequences of the Progressive Movement was that scientists, and certainly many people, began constructing a great number of grand theories as to why things in the natural world were the way they were. These theories were very focused on health, especially in the case of positive eugenics and prohibition. When it came to diet some number of dietitians adopted the viewpoint that spices and other flavors that “popped” may have been linked with forms of cancer and various diseases. A more serious number were concerned with helping reduce hunger and worked on food that was easy to make but high in calories – and thus the canned and processed meal was born.

Fortified breakfast cereal was one invention that came from Cornell. Another was this “white sauce” actually developed by Flora Rose herself.

Perhaps this movement was partially to blame for the rise in processed food and added sugar in American diets after World War 2. As fat and fiber were taken out of food, they were replaced by salt and sugar. Perhaps important for people who are starving. Less so for a society stricken by obesity and diabetes.

Nutrition During the Great Depression

Last week we had the pleasure of welcoming Jane Ziegelman to Rose house, and learned of nutrition during the Great Depression and the American relationship to food.

One of the things which I found fascinating in the talk was how nutritionists and scientists were proponents of a flavorless diet, in addition to introducing fortified cereals and cream-based sauces into the American diet. I find this interesting as I had read an article earlier describing a similar occurrence in Japan during the great depression. In order to feed everyone cheaply, the government promoted fried bread as healthy, as it was a cheap source of fats, carbohydrates, and calories. This strongly echos the fatty cream-based sauces and grains that scientists pushed as healthy during the American Great Depression. I find it really sad that people were not as knowledgeable about what constituted a proper diet, as many people were probably malnourished. Further, the lack of knowledge about what was actually healthy explains the much shorter life expectancy in the 1930’s versus now (60 vs 80).

In addition, it is interesting to note that fortified cereals (and fried bread in Japan) are still incredibly popular today, and many people consume it every morning. Perhaps this is a lingering effect of promoting fortified cereals so strongly during the Great Depression.

Another interesting things I learned during this talk was how Flora Rose’s knowledge about food helped assuage famine after World War I and during the Great Depression. The more I learn about her, the more proud I am to be living in Rose house this year and next year.

A Visit To The Past

A week ago the Rose Scholars were visited by acclaimed author Jane Ziegelman who spoke to us about the time of the Great Depression and the importance of house wives during that troublesome situation. It was interesting how she began her talk by referring to the iconic photos of endless breadlines that would form for people to get food nationwide. Zielgelman explained that bread lines had been an iconic image in many European countries that were struggling with poverty as well. Also, it was shocking to note that many members of the middle class and upper middle class were opposed to receiving aid, especially in the form of rations or food stamps, because they felt embarrassed by it. Doctors, businessmen, and engineers were admirable professions of individuals that were suddenly out of a job because of the market crash and it lead to many family dynamic changes, from being well off to having just enough to survive. It caused me to wonder if the American mentality to always want more and be independent got in the way of people helping one another because they were too proud to receive help themselves. It is a very American mentality to be successful and take the credit all for oneself, which could have been why, even though half the country was struggling at the time, people were still embarrassed to ask for help in obtaining the simplest rations of food.

The Great Depression also brought about a new age of understanding what foods provided the most nutrients and could be preserved the longest. House wives were able to learn about various nutrition facts pertaining to healthy foods versus high caloric foods and learn the best ways to feed their families. I find it fascinating that usually, for there to be change in a community or nation, something has to occur that is typically harmful or inconvenient for everyone. Having an unemployment rate as high as 25% at one point, there was definitely reason for  people to seek out help from each other and the government to get through the state the country was in. Children were malnourished and adults could not find work to support their families. With this event however, proper eating habits, receiving the right amount of protein, and reaching out for help no matter what socioeconomic level someone is as all benefits that came about due to the Great Depression.

I was wonderful to have Ziegelman speak with us, especially seeing that she has really devoted much of her writing to capturing that time period in American history. I hope to read her novel one day to get a better look at what it was like for the people of the United States to overcome such adversities together. In a way, as distraught as our nation was at the time, it was a time period when everyone came together to help each other out, because there was nothing more that could be done but unite to overcome the harsh times.

The Green Revolution

As a food science major, I was very interested in the work of Jane Zeigelman. Her talk about food during The Great Depression was extremely informative, especially the information about Flora Rose’s role in quantifying and standardising the food system across the US.

Although the Great Depression required a great deal of innovation in the way we handle food, there is another related aspect that helped with managing the food system during the 1930s: the Green Revolution. As the name may indicate, the revolution is linked with plants or to be more specific, agriculture. The revolution, which lasted till the 1960s, was a period of intense scientific inquiry into increasing the efficiency of agriculture.

In specific, scientists advocated the development and use of high-yield varieties of cereal crops (Which were an integral part of nutrition during the 1930s). More importantly, it focused on the use of nitrogen fertilisers to boost crop growth and reduce the time required till harvest. Although the Green Revolution was undoubtedly important is establishing food security in the early 20th century, it is also partially responsible for environmental and economic concerns that plague the current food industry.

The use of fertilisers was promoted ever since the Green Revolution, however it lead to an accumulated pollution of water bodies, creating an unsafe ecosystem. The commercialisation of high yield crops has lead to the development of companies like Monsanto, that have a monopoly on the market for seeds . Another issue would be that the increased output is harmful to the farmers themselves as it reduces the cost of the crop and the subsequent revenue for the farmer.

Quantifying the food industry has been very useful in maintaining a secure food supply. However, it left the food industry in an area of monotony: vast monocultures and processed foods composed entirely of a few cereals and so on. As a result, a big challenge that currently faces the food and agriculture industry is sustainability and diversity.

How has our relationship with food changed?

This week’s Rose Cafe was very interesting. Dr. Ziegelman talked to us about food production and our relationship with food in the Great Depression and how this relationship continues to evolve today.

An interesting part of the talk was the use of fortified cereals. Examples of such cereals include Milkorno, which were enriched with the nutrition and calories needed for Americans to survive. Such foods took a minimalist of food and focused on ensuring that people recieve the “right” foods and are able to survive and get the right nutrition. It is interesting that in contrast, today, cereals are notorious for being unhealthy processed foods that are simply empty calories with no real nutritional value, full of high fructose corn syrup. As consumers, we have to be very smart about what we eat, and ensure that we are aware of what is going in to our body by checking what foods actually consist of- many cereals today which are advertised as healthy are often high calorie, or have high-fructose corn syrup.

Another example of changing perceptions of foods is how during the Depression era, nutritionists including our very own Flora Rose encouraged cream based white sauced in foods. Today, in our vegan friendly and more nutrititonally aware society, we are aware that such foods are very high in fats and lack nutrition- and that tomato based sauces are far superior.

In conclusion, this talk was insightful and shed light on a lot of differences between food, and our relationship and perception of it, now compared to during the Great Depression.

Great Depression Nutrition

Last week I went to the Rose Cafe presented by Jane Ziegelman. She covered the development of nutrition science in America during the Great Depression and how our very own Flora Rose helped in the effort. The Great Depression posed an immense challenge to millions of Americans as they were faced with a new reality of hunger. Most of those people had never suffered like that before, and had generally looked down upon the bread lines of charities. But as unemployment and food insecurity swept the nation, home economists began creating solutions to the problem of undernourishment.

Flora Rose specialized in food science and had helped feed the people of Belgium after World War I. During the Great Depression she focused on producing a food which would aid Americans in getting the necessary vitamins and nutrients which their diets now lacked. Rose’s creation was a series of fortified cereals which could be used for everything, from regular breakfast cereal to an ingredient in a casserole. A theme among all home economists of the time was to eat foods which had mild flavors; basically very bland and boring food. People thought that the most healthy food was the worst tasting, and surprisingly this is a theme which started in America at its very inception and has continued on to the present day. Also, it was during the Great Depression that milk became wildly known was a ‘super food’ which provided every vitamin and mineral the body needed. This is why almost any recipe from that time include milk as an ingredient even if milk really shouldn’t be included.

In addition to her role as a food innovator, Flora Rose and other home economists worked as mediators to the public about new scientific knowledge about food. They explained what vitamins were, and how they worked. The government got involved by establishing a Federal Bureau of Home Economics, and they even started a radio program in which a character named “Aunt Sammy” addressed the questions and concerns regarding how to stay healthy for a little money as possible. The idea that eating scientifically was the best grew during this time, and it even became a patriotic thing to do so that you saved resources for the rest of the country.

The Great Depression changed the way Americans ate drastically, and has had effects to this day. Fortified foods have become commonplace today, just check the ingredients list of any loaf of bread, bottle of milk, or box of cereal. Flora Rose, Cornell, and home economists were an integral part of that modernization of food.

Food During the Great Depression

Dr. Ziegelman provided valuable insight into food production during the Great Depression and how that is still influencing how we eat today.

I found Cornell’s role in all this very interesting. This school was the birthplace of fortified cereals, something that we still find en masse on the shelves of grocery stores today. It makes me question how valid our current food practices are if we are still using ideas adopted from the 1920s. For example, I know baby formula was invented during that time too to get Americans to consume more diary; now, when mother’s milk is proven to be more healthy for babies, many people around the world still rely on formula because they believe it is superior.

Another interesting point discussed during the cafe was American food culture. Compared to other cultures around the world, we are much less concerned about food and what we put into our bodies and I think that that has a negative effect on our society and health. Too often Americans are eating junk food on the go instead of siting down and have a proper healthy and nutritious meal with family and friends. I believe that this is a reason why so many Americans are overweight. We should think more critically about what we put into our bodies, especially considering the histories of said foods.

Great Depression Diet

Last Wednesday, I got to see Jane Ziegelman give a talk about food during the great depression. One aspect I really enjoyed was seeing how involved Cornell University, and Flora Rose, were with solving the hunger problem! I also thought it was really interesting to consider how the hunger problem was dealt with. Using the government rations, recipes had to be formulated which made use of very little. The idea of the ideal diet during the great depression was that which had the most nutrition for the least amount of money.

This made me consider our food consumption today. Today, many of us take food for granted. As a result, we tend to also eat for pleasure, not just sustenance. This can lead to unhealthy eating, which is compounded by industrial innovations which have led to the rise of what is essentially “fake food”. We consume a lot of food which does not serve an important nutritional purpose and in many cases is actually harmful. The diet during the great depression focused strictly on what our bodies needed to survive. In light of this, perhaps we can learn something from the minimalist diet of those during the great depression!

“Health Foods” as Trends

What I found most interesting about Jane Ziegelman’s presentation on the Great Depression was the change in what were considered health foods then and what are considered health foods now.

During the Great Depression, nutrition experts like Flora Rose advocated for the consumption of “white sauce,” a roux-like dairy-based sauce. It was added to casseroles, bakes, and pasta. However, as some students mentioned during the discussion, today such creamy, milk-based sauces are seen as unhealthy, harmful foods. One popular trend in food blogging today is replacing milk-based white sauces with cauliflower, soy, or cashew-based sauces. Americans are increasingly reluctant to consume cheeses and animal fats, and are becoming more aware of other calcium sources.

Flora Rose also created fortified cereals such as Milkwheato and Milkorno. These foods would give the starving American people both the calories and the nutrients that they lacked. Today, cereals, even fortified cereals, are seen as junk foods. Most popular brands, such as Cheerios, Raisin Bran, and Fruit Loops, use alarming amounts of added sugar and food coloring, to the point that their detrimental effects outweigh their nutritional value. Even cereal brands that market themselves as healthy alternatives, such as supermarket granolas, actually use disproportionately large amounts of sugar. The public has also turned on fortified foods as well – often vitamins and nutrients must be accompanied by other nutrients in order to be properly absorbed by the body, so isolating a nutrient from a food and adding it to another could result in less absorption.

Nutritional science is constantly evolving, and it’s alarming knowing that even our understanding of nutrition today is limited. In another hundred years, likely many foods that we consider healthy will be proven to be harmful for our bodies. I just hope that nutritional science never turns on avocados.

Food passing over

When I saw the posting for rose café, I was interested in the fact that the topic touched on two area: Martha Van Ressler (Human Ecology) and Flora rose house. It was interesting to the fact that  I got to gain knowledge about my home college and my residency.I was surprised to know how Flora Rose specialized in food science and helped the USA during a time of war and the great depression. She focused on creating foods that are high in nutrition yet cost efficient, aiding many to be knowledgeable about nutrition.I noticed that America place great value of nutrition on sugar, carb, and fat in the result of great depression and still does too in modern time. Unlike many other countries, which focus a lot on spice and flavor, American diet has a lot to do with fatty richness. I remember having a hard time getting used to American food when I moved here, because of lack of spice and diverse flavors. It is interesting to see how long history has influenced so much of modern diet.

The American Diet

On Wednesday I went to a Rose Cafe where we talked about food during the Great Depression. One thing that stood out to me was that back in those times food scientists recommended a bland diet. They claimed that food that tasted good was bad for your health and should be avoided. I can see how they would think that, considering that they didn’t have much knowledge about nutrition. Food with an excess of sugar, or carbohydrates, or fats can taste good, and eating too much of it is not healthy.  Remnants of that philosophy can still be seen in American food today. Compared with the cuisine of other countries, American food doesn’t contain a lot of spices. I remember that when I had friends over for dinner back home, they would often say that our food was too spicy, even though my mom made an effort to make it more mild when my friends came over. Now that I live on campus and eat dining hall food everyday, when I go back home, I can see what my friends were complaining about. I can’t handle spicy food as well as I used to be able to, and my mom has to make an effort to make my food more mild now!

Home Economics and Nutrition

On Wednesday, I attended the Rose Cafe hosted by Jane Ziegelman, a food historian and author of A Square Meal: A Culinary History of the Great Depression.  She discussed how home economists came into the spotlight during the Great Depression to modernize America’s eating habits and educate Americans about nutrition.  

During this time period, home economists discovered the importance of vitamins such as Vitamins A, B, and D to good eating and the prevention of deficiency diseases.  Ziegelman also explained how NYC public schools found that many students were not attending classes in 1930.  Truant officers discovered that the primary cause was children being too weak from hunger to leave the house.  To help combat this, the Temporary Emergency Relief Administration was established to provide enough food for a minimal living standard, with a significant quantity of milk, along with bread, potatoes, and beans.  Many cookbooks and dietary guidelines were written and radio programs were broadcast to promote preparing nutritious meals.  

This talk furthered the discussion from the February 1 Rose Cafe with Eileen Keating: both lectures explained how Flora Rose developed cereals fortified with calcium and vitamins  (Milkorno, Milkoato, and Milkwheato) and sold them to the Federal Emergency Relief Administration, thereby influencing American nutritional habits.  Nutritionists continue to identify aspects of food that should be avoided, as scientific knowledge continues to progress in this area.  For example, there was a push to limit fat significantly from food, but this led to an increase in sugar to give food taste.  

Towards the end of the discussion, Professor Blalock brought up that during the Great Depression, 25 percent of families’ incomes were spent on food, compared to the 9 percent of annual income spent today on food.  We discussed how our society has developed an ambivalence towards food in many ways due to its abundance, and made me appreciate how fortunate I am to be food-secure.  People during the Great Depression could not afford expensive food, like meat; meanwhile, today, I can choose from a wide variety of food at one of Cornell’s many eateries.  

A Bland Experience

I attended the talk “Nutrition Warriors: Home Economics and the Fight to Feed America During the Great Depression”. The talk was given by Ms. Jane Ziegelman, historian and author of A Square Meal: A Culinary History of the Great Depression. In that hour period, Ms. Ziegelman discussed the perhaps rather unknown side of the thing everyone has heard about the Great Depression: hunger. When their children no longer had the energy to go to school, mothers frantically started learning all they could about vitamins and how to best prepare food that gave the most nutrition, all while trying to stretch every dollar they had. Everyone thought that it was just a temporary setback, a recession. They had no idea that it would end up being a decade-long Great Depression. It was a period that saw shifts in the country’s political and social landscape.

My prior knowledge of the work people like Flora Rose and Mrs. Roosevelt did on behalf of the quarter of all Americans unemployed and undernourished was very limited. I had learned about the bread lines and FDR’s New Deal in my history classes, but I had never learned about home economics. I certainly had never heard of Milkorno and Milkoato. They changed the way Americans ate by promoting an ambivalence toward culinary enjoyment (something I cannot endorse, but am able understand their reasons). It was better for food to be a bland experience, as placing too much stock in flavor would lead people to choose the wrong kinds of food. The home economists’ vision of utilitarian cuisine on the American dinner table was reflected in the emphasis on potatoes, carrots, bread, cabbage, prunes, beans, and milk in recipes. I found the talk to be very interesting, especially since Cornell played such a significant role in aiding the country during that trying period. The talk has certainly given me much to consider the next time I swipe in at the dining hall.

 

Scientific Eating

The guest speaker at this week’s Rose Cafe was Ms. Jane Ziegelman, who is a historian and the  author of a book titled Nutrition Warriors: Home Economics and the Fight to Feed America During the Great Depression. The topic of the night was about the struggle of working class families to eat as nutritionally as possible under extreme financial distress. At the forefront of this moment for home economics was Cornell’s own Flora Rose.

Often times, when we learn about the Great Depression, we focus on the economics and governance of the time era, but just as important is the cultural aspect within the families. At the peak, the unemployment rate was 25% and people who had never accepted charity before, such as the professional middle class, found themselves in breadlines. Children stopped attending school because of the effects of malnutrition. We know today that mineral and vitamin deficiencies led to their poor physical and cognitive health, but these concepts were relatively new in the 1930s. Therefore, it was incredibly important to come up with solutions for feeding families, especially children. Flora Rose and First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt worked together to come up with recipes that, as advertised, cost only seven and a half cents but contained all the vitamins for a nutritionally wholesome meal. Furthermore, this created a whole new home economics movement where women went to university for essentially a degree in the sciences, especially here at Cornell.  For example, Cornell was involved with the first nationally distributed fortified cereals, not unlike the ones we eat today.

It is so interesting to see how humans’ relationship with food has changed over the course of generations. Trends and fads, such as most recently a ‘gluten-free’ diet, come and go. In another example, the Atkins’ diet led to a decrease in sales for pasta and rice. However, most of the time, these diets have no scientific basis, unlike the scientific eating that was introduced during the Great Depression. Because the types of food we consume directly impact our well-being, the study of nutrition has always been and always will be an incredibly important science.

Food and Flora Rose

On Wednesday evening I went to the talk “Nutrition Warriors: Home Economics and the Fight to Feed America During the Great Depression” by Jane Ziegelman, a visiting writer who wrote A Square Meal: A Culinary History of the Great Depression. Before the talk, I learned during the lottery at House Dinner that American people used to spend 25% of their income during the Great Depression time, while they now only spend 9% on it.

During the Great Depression, the crisis in financial industry expanded to every aspect of the society. Household was lack of money and generally were granted a set amount of necessary food by the government. At the time, there were homo-economists who noticed that Americans were eating too much starch and spending too much income on food. By the way, I didn’t know what home economist was and Wikipedia defines it as ” the profession and field of study that deals with the economics and management of the home and community”. Flora Rose was a home economist at the time and also was one of the first female professors at Cornell (also MVR). Mrs.Jane showed a a picture of Flora Rose along side Eleanor Roosevelt. She told us that Eleanor Roosevelt was also a home economist at the time and she was promoting budget eating in White House at the time, but FDR didn’t really appreciate her style. Flora Rose developed two kinds of breakfast cereal: Milkorno and Milkoato, which were two cereal choices that are inexpensive and nutritious at the same time. Mrs Jane did mentioned that during the Great Depression each household would get a set amount of milk, meat, beans and other food that contain necessary nutrition for human body.

Although not having a nutrition background previously, I still learned about food history during Great Depression, comparing what we have now. Professor Blalock commented at the end of the talk that as our income grow, the percentage we spend our income on food would become less. I feel very lucky to enjoy such great dining halls on west campus everyday and I hope to learn more about nutrition and how to stay balanced in our diet.