Social Media (Pros and Cons)

In the Table Talk on Monday, we talked about a TED by Dr. Cal Newport about how he’s never used social media, but has led a better/more productive life because of it.

That made me think about whether or not MY life would be better and more productive without social media. The answer is, I think, yes! and at the same time, no.

I will admit, in the days after the table talk, I uninstalled the Facebook app from my phone. I did find myself reaching for my phone to start aimlessly scrolling through stories and videos, only stopping when I remember that I don’t have Facebook installed…. so I think there are some very valid points in Newport’s TED talk about how social media gives us constant stimuli which causes us to be more distracted. I definitely agree with him on that (obviously, since I keep reaching for my phone!), but I think social media was never a particularly big issue for me when I’m working and studying. My Facebook use is mostly during lunch (if I’m eating alone), when I wake up or go to sleep–which yes, takes up a big chunk of time (and that’s time I now have back!) but it’s not particularly detrimental to my overall productivity, as Newport suggested.

So, from that standpoint, I think if I got rid of social media completely, I would have a lot of time for myself, whether it be spent working or doing something I enjoy doing (reading, lounging around, sleeping more, etc!)

On the other hand, I actually can’t get myself to deactivate Facebook completely. I actually “text” all my friends and family through Facebook messenger… in fact, most of my friends don’t really text anyone anymore. Yes, I’m sure they would switch over if I asked (and they have before, when I uninstalled messenger on my phone for exams etc), but it really is the main messaging app I have right now.

In addition, I also use social media to publicize my orchestra concerts, piano recitals, and stay in touch with family outside of the country. I think social media is the main why people my age communicate today, and getting rid of it completely just isn’t 100% feasible.

However, that being said, I also haven’t gotten rid of it completely, so who am I to say it’s not feasible for someone my age? But I also don’t think Newport, as a person who has never used social media, can really tell us how to live our lives and how that could potentially improve it seeing that he’s never used it himself.

Just like everything in this world… moderation is key. If social media is taking you away from living your life (checking your phone constantly when you’re with friends or family, for example), then obviously you should tone it down with the social media usage. But for me, it doesn’t have a huge place in my life, and I find it easy to put it away when I’m working, so I don’t think it would increase my productivity or improve my life drastically if I cut it out completely.

What I Learned About Bikeshare

It was really interesting to attend the table talk on bike sharing today. Seema gave us some of the history behind bike sharing, and I was surprised to learn that it actually started in the 1950s/60s in Europe. I had originally thought is started around the 90s/2000s, just because that was around when it started becoming more popular in the U.S.

I personally have not had an experience with using bike share. I am definitely aware of the big red bikes system on campus, but because Cornell is not really what you would call a bikable campus (hills, ice, more hills!), I have yet to try it out. In addition, I find that biking along with cars can be a little scary. Though (I believe?) Cornell has designated bike lanes, the idea of being right next to cars that are much bigger and capable of going much faster seems quite scary. The only place I could imagine biking around on campus is perhaps the Arts Quad, but even then, I don’t really think it’s worth it to pay for bike share just to bike around for fun.

I think it’s quite sad that bike share probably isn’t going to take off in the U.S. more than what it is now. It’s huge in Europe, China, and even Singapore, but I think because of the way many cities in the U.S. are set up, it’s quite hard for bike share to take up a bigger part of our lives. I’m from Atlanta, so my experience with my city is that it is very much a driving city. Many people who work in Atlanta commute from the Atlanta metro area/suburbs, and public transportation isn’t really convinent, so I can imagine the challenges of setting up an expansive bike sharing system there. Though a system does exist, it’s mostly limited to biking around the Atlanta belt line (just a green loop around the city), and the parks in Atlanta. In addition, I learned from this table talk that bike sharing has a lot to do with government policy as well. It is more successful in Europe because owning a car is a lot more hassle. In the U.S., it’s actually quite cheap (compared to Europe).

All of that being said, I do see bike sharing being a good thing and I wish it could be more fesible to use it on a larger scale in the United States. Not only is it better for the environment, it can also be great for our health and be a potentially cheaper way to travel around.

Power and Dystopia

After watching What Happened to Monday, Magdala led a discussion on power. The government in the movie has total control over the entire population–how did it get to be like that? Well, it’s obvious that the government had constant surveillance of the population (with checkpoints, ID bracelets), but I think the growth/development of power in just a small group of people (Nicolette Cayman, for example, the mastermind behind the no sibling policy) comes from events that are even before that.

One thing I think that contributed to the rise of power of this small group of people is perhaps the desperation of the population when the Earth was facing a famine (introduced at the very beginning of the film). The result of the starvation of the population probably led to a few people standing up to say, “hey, here is a solution”–and really desperate people are willing to try anything, including outlawing siblings and not questioning how they’re making them fall asleep. I feel like this is a trend seen in history as well–when a nation or a group of people is facing a lot of hardship, they are willing to turn to practically anyone with a potential solution. And if that person happens to have ill intents, then that person or group of people who end up holding the power will hold the power for quite a while until someone challenges the status quo and bring them down.

The genre of dystopia is quite interesting because it draws on a little bit of history to make a “prediction” on what could happen. Hopefully something like what happened in this movie would never happen, but I can definitely see where parts of the plot line came from. For example, checkpoints could be inspired from martial law in different parts of history where checkpoints are/were effective, and the no siblings policy is pretty much exactly like the one-child policy that was in China (of course without the whole freaky, processing siblings and killing them part…).

Interesting and thought provoking movie, especially with the discussion at the end. I do wonder what the meaning of dystopia (or dystopian genre) is though. We’re quite far away from everything that happened in this movie, so I’m not sure if this is truly a “warning” to society. So I guess that leads me to wonder–what’s the motivation behind this film?

Opera!

La Bohème is one of the most frequently performed operas at the Met, and from the performance this past Saturday, it’s clear that the company knew exactly how to marry both an intricate set and powerful voices to create a production that tugs at the heartstrings.

Because this opera was broadcasted (as opposed to the viewers seeing the actors themselves on stage), I feel like the experience of watching this opera isn’t quite as authentic. As the audience sitting in a theater, the images are curated for the viewers–it’s all about what the producers of the broadcast wants to show the viewers rather than what on the stage draws the attention of the viewers–for example, they might zoom in to certain characters’ faces at various parts of the opera to emphasize heightened emotions, whereas someone who is watching the opera in person would be free to look at everything. In a way, this makes the intentions and messages of the production appear to be more obvious, but it is also curated to be whatever the producers want the viewers to see.

Sonya Yoncheva as Mimi stood out to me as a gentle and sensitive singer, which I felt was fitting as she played (quite literally) “the girl next door”. Opposite of Yoncheva is Michael Fabiano as Rodolfo, whose rich and confident voice, I felt, complemented Yoncheva’s well. Yoncheva and Fabiano gave us a beautiful picture of tender, young love through the opera–whether it be the bashful, but tender feelings of young love in Act I, heartbreak in Act III, or the feelings of loss and helplessness in Act IV, the pair was a formidable combination.

Though the opera is a tragedy, there are moments of “fun” and comedy embedded within. Most notably is the camaraderie between the quartet of artists–Rodolfo, Marcello, Schaunard, and Colline’s actors managed to establish a sort of easy rapport throughout the opera. Most notably, their banter, singing, and dancing right before Mimi’s appearance (and death) in Act VI was fluid and organic, which I felt not only added to the unexpectedness and emotional intensity of Mimi’s death, but also highlighted Puccini’s ability to write an opera that has comical moments embedded in the tragedy.

I also enjoyed seeing Susanna Phillips as Musetta. Musetta was fiery, flirtatious, and flamboyant–a character foil of Mimi, who had come off as more reserved and tender. Phillips, too, as with the rest of the cast, is a strong and confident singer, and I thought her performance of Musetta was likable despite Musetta’s seeming want for attention throughout Acts II and III. Her presentation of Musetta, as someone who is a kind and gentle soul underneath everything was convincing to me in Act IV, though from a plot standpoint, Musetta’s change in personality in Act IV came rather abruptly. That said, however, Phillips’s portrayal of Musetta was fitting for each of those acts, first singing flamboyantly when Musetta was first introduced to us, then adopting a more solemn mood towards the end of the opera for her character.

As a whole, I thought the pacing of Act I was a little slow–though the music was beautiful, especially when Mimi and Rodolfo first met, it seemed drawn out and bland, with little action. The following acts do pick up, however, and the grand set of Act II stood out to me in particular. The chorus was splendid, portraying the hustle and bustle of the Latin Quarter with not only their voices, but a single donkey marching across the stage, parades of people, a man on stilts, and even a clown. Act III was a very different kind of ‘active’–it captivated me not only with the beautiful snowy scenery but also the drama between Mimi and Rodolfo, Musetta and Marcello–tied together at the end of the act with a quartet, with Mimi and Rodolfo’s reconciliation and Mimi and Marcello’s separation. Though this act, like the first, was composed with the majority of lyrical arias, it did feel more active to me than Act I both due to the picturesque set and the drama between the characters. Finally, Act IV was packed with emotional intensity. It starts with the four bohemians’ horseplay, “boys being boys”, but the mood of the opera almost instantaneously transitions into that of a somber one as Musetta and Mimi shows up. This transition, I felt, as jarring, a stark contrast to what was happening only moments ago in the plot, but I feel like it adds to the drama and perhaps tells the audience of the uncertainty of life and love.

I think the ending left me a little perplexed; though I know that Mimi was going to die in the final act prior to watching the opera, I also didn’t quite expect the opera to end so abruptly. The element of surprise in this most likely leads to a more intense emotional response from the audience and serves as a cathartic release after all the action, so I understand the purpose of this abruptness, but there was a part of me wishing for a more definite conclusion, especially for Musetta and Marcello’s storyline.

With all that said, I thought the audience reception of the broadcasted opera was great. Even though it’s obvious that none of the actors could hear us, many of the audience members still clapped after acts, and especially when each actor came out to bow at the end. Though the opera was taking place many miles away, the audience members in the movie theater obviously still felt engaged.

Overall, The Met Production of La Boheme was a beautiful opera featuring beautiful music, acting, and a elaborate set. It was enjoyable, and though the pacing of Act I seemed a little bit slow, the subsequent acts more than made up for it.

Sleep is a necessity!

I attended a table talk on sleep this past week and I thought it was interesting what everyone had to say. I think in our (college) culture, we all think sleep is a luxury, and according to some of the preliminary readings, the majority of people are sleep deprived/don’t meet the recommended 8 hours of sleep. That is not surprising at all to me.

In the past (last year I think), for one of the Rose Scholars posts I have written about stress/well-being and how we essentially live in a culture where we perhaps romanticize being overworked. “I only had 4 hours of sleep last night!” a student would say, and their friend would say “oh I only had 3”–who is more overworked is essentially a “competition”. I don’t think I saw this as dramatically within my own friend groups, but I know this type of conversation is definitely a thing here at Cornell.

I’ve been doing o.k. in my own sleep schedule this semester, (probably still falling short of the recommended 9 hours and 15 minutes–but I think I get close at around 8 hours a night) but there are definitely still times when I feel like sleeping is a luxury. “Oh, I should be doing this”, I would think, and feel guilty for sleeping 8 hours, but then I would remind myself that there is absolutely nothing wrong with getting sleep! Especially when I know that if I get to the point of being too sleep deprived, I’m more likely to catch a cold, burn out, or feel mentally drained.

Taking care of yourself is definitely one of the first things you should do when you’re in a high stress environment like Cornell. I don’t think everyone realizes that and I’m sure we (me included) have all had times in our time here where we feel like sleeping is a luxury and not a necessity. I think this table talk was good in that we all talked about some of our time management skills/experiences as well as our thoughts about sleep.

Custodial Services on West

I just attended an interesting talk about custodial/facilities management on West Campus. When I read the description of the talk, I was actually quite amazed to learn that there are 2000+ rooms on West Campus. I was even more amazed to learn that facilities only have about 30 full time staff (hopefully I didn’t hear this wrong!).

In any case, Anthony seemed like such a genuinely nice person! He explained the ins and outs of managing building care on West Campus, as well as received our feedback and gave us some anecdotes. I’ve always had a lot of respect for the custodial staff at Cornell, because it can’t be easy having to clean up after college students (not just trash and general bathroom messes, but also stuff like… vomit) but I think hearing Anthony speak about his job and the job of his staff gave me some new insight about what all they do and what they are responsible for. I thought it was interesting that Anthony described us (the students!) as essentially, “the customers”–at the end of the day, the goal is for us to have a safe and clean campus life experience. And he also told us to never hesitate submitting a maintenance request! I always feel like I’m bothering them if I submit a maintenance request, but he said that we can submit a request for anything from as small as “the soap needs refilling” to something bigger, like a heat or light issue, etc. In fact, these gets factored in when they next talk about budgeting–so if there is a lot of requests for soap, for example, they might factor in more frequent soap-refill times in the future.

I’ve never had a bad experience with facilities, and I’ve had some pretty bad luck with things breaking during my last 3 years at Cornell (the most dramatic event being that one time, someone literally smashed open my window at 1AM in the morning…), so I am super grateful for the wonderful facilities staff that we have here. I think the talk was interesting and enlightening, and it was actually really great to know the ins and outs of managing West Campus and all the work that goes into it too.

Super Bowl Sunday!

I’ve never been a football fan/football watcher myself, mainly because I didn’t really understand what people were doing when they’re playing football (I kind of get the gist of the game, but I never really know where I’m supposed to look when people are playing and I am generally confused about 90% of the football game), but I do know there is a lot of hype surrounding the SuperBowl, and I know that a lot of people are actually more interested in the commercials themselves than the SuperBowl.

So, while I cannot say much about the game itself, I do find the marketing aspect of it interesting. Last year, about 114 million people watched the SuperBowl (more than a third of the U.S. population), and apparently a 30-second ad would cost around five million dollars. That’s worth it (?) though–that’s only 4 cents per view, and in the social media age, the effect of ads can be maximized with social media exposure. If the advertisers do something novel, tell a story, show something memorable, and then come up with some sort of catchy hashtag, then potential customers/SuperBowl viewers are more likely to react to it, leading to awareness of the brand’s products and services, and of course, brand recall.

In researching online about the SuperBowl commercials, I found a few interesting facts:

  • Some brands might not be able to make back the money they spent on a SuperBowl commercial, since it is now so expensive (and the 5 million price tag for a 30 second ad doesn’t even take into account the cost of actually producing the ad!)
  • A number of advertisers have started to post part of their ads (or the full thing!) on social media (such as Youtube) before the game–probably to double up on the exposure by coupling the ad with social media
  • Because of how expensive SuperBowl ads are, brands such as Pepsi, Dr. Pepper, and GM decided to skip a few of the recent SuperBowls
  • Interestingly, this year will be the first time since 1992 that SuperBowl and the Winter Olympics are broadcasted on the same network. In comparison, though, in 2010, a 30-second Winter Olympic advertisement sold for ~94.3 thousand dollars.

I feel like from those couple facts, it’s clear that the SuperBowl commercials are pretty special and even significant to American culture/economics. It’s really interesting to me that people would be interested in the ads (after all that’s all I want to skip when I’m watching a show on TV!) but also I feel like SuperBowl commercials aren’t really your typical commercials. In terms of the cinematography and content, SuperBowl ads are usually more polished, and some have emotional, heartstring tugging content, and some companies make political statements.

While I’m not planning on watching the game this year, I’ll probably be looking at some of the blogs posting reviews on the SuperBowl Commercials, or this NY Times article on the commercial live coverage.