I found Before Night Falls to be an artistic movie that was limited in perspective. Scenes such as the one in the prison where the inmates ask Arenas to write their letters were wonderfully crafted–showing the passage of time and the power of beauty in a dark place. But the majority of the movie portrays Arenas as a talented writer who is persecuted for his work and his sexuality. Though these things are true, there are many facets to Arenas that are not shown in the movie.
Arenas actually started off as a sympathizer for Castro is the revolution. Before Night Falls shies away from this paradoxical fact, and chooses to portray Arenas as totally against the Cuban government. This complexity would have been interesting to see in the movie. Additionally, in the movie, Arenas dies by choice with Lazaro’s choice, while in real life, Arenas dies from drug overdose. I don’t understand why the movie couldn’t accurately portray his death. Are they avoiding any possible negative portrayal of Arenas? I would have liked Arenas to be developed into a more complicated character than the persecuted, brilliant, good man that he was.
I also found the movie to be unnecessarily sexual at times. When Lieutenant Victor holds a gun to Arenas’ face, you’d think he’d be reflecting on his life or thinking about what he’s leaving behind. Instead, he’s having a sexual fantasy involving Lt. Victor placing a gun in his mouth to simulate oral sex. I think the oversexualization of Arenas takes away from his character’s overall development.
Sometimes we forget that arthouse films purposefully avoid facts or oversexualizing situations in order to paint an exaggerated sense of the author’s perspective. While this can overwhelm a film at times, in other cases it is the only way to effectively get a point across.