How Does a Judge Think?

In this Rose Cafe event, Judge Scott Miller came to speak to us about his job and answer questions that we had for him.  What I found most interesting about the discussion was his explanation of how the public often forgets the humanity of every person on trial: he told us that most of his cases involved people who had lived in poverty or an inhospitable environment and didn’t know any better from the petty crimes they were committing; he also explained that we will most likely judge someone for one, minor crime that was committed when in reality he/she is a relatively decent person.  I also thought it was interesting how he was often conflicted with determining a person’s sentence because he wanted to be just as well as fair in administering a sentence.  This discussion allowed for me to gain more respect for judges because I realized that they are responsible for determining someone’s fate–jail time, etc.–by pondering what they think is necessary to hold the person accountable while also keeping the public’s safety in mind.

Comments are closed.