Last Friday I watched a film called “Hacksaw Ridge”, which details the real life story of Desmond T. Doss – a man who served in the American military as a conscientious objective, choosing not to carry a gun and performed duties as a field medic. The climax of the film details the extraordinary heroics of our hero, wherein he lowered hundreds of people to safety from the top of the ridge, saving many lives – an action which ultimately won him the Medal of Honor.
I’ll be upfront and say there are aspects of the film which do not sit well with me, but I want to say here and now that the critique which follows is in no way intended as a commentary on the real life Desmond Doss. I agree wholeheartedly with the assessment of his actions that won him the Medal of Honor, and do think his story could function as truly inspirational and awe inspiring. What follows is a critique of a movie (and a character in a movie), not a man.
It could easily be argued that one of the themes of “Hacksaw Ridge” is that of motive – the absence of motive for going to war is arguably what drove Desmond’s father to alcoholism. The pointlessness of the first war, the loss of his friends for no motivating reason, clearly drains him. The call to arms made by the U.S. after Pearl Harbor motivates the young men of the entire nation to enlist, and this along with the pressure of the enlistment of so many of his friends motivates Desmond T. Doss to enlist. And, his religious beliefs motivate him to pursue the unusual military career he ultimately had. This religious belief directly motivates his actions at the battle of Hacksaw ridge – his prayer (true to life) is shown, as he asks to keep grabbing one more man after another from the top of the ridge that he might lower them to safety.
Desmond is an individual deeply passionate in his beliefs. In the spirit of empathy, I want to consider another man likely deeply passionate in his beliefs. During the battle of Hacksaw ridge, a Japanese soldier lights a grenade, holds it to his chest, and hugs an American soldier – killing them both. I cannot comment on the accuracy of such action to real Japanese soldiers from the war, but within the context of a movie it paints a troubling picture. Desmond’s belief is directly correlated with the success of the Americans on the ridge – the commanding officer says as much, and the film goes out of its way to show how inspired his fellow soldiers are with his actions and commitment to his belief system in the end. The film emphasizes the correlation between Desmond’s beliefs and the victory of the American army. If I were to give the film the benefit of the doubt, I would say this correlation is with the strength of his beliefs. Because Desmond believed deeply, honestly, and with conviction, the American military was victorious. Yet we are presented with the equally passionate strength and conviction of the Japanese soldier. One could argue that Desmond’s strength “wins” because he was motivated towards peaceful actions. I see two problems with this perspective however. The first is that Desmond’s actions ultimately promote violence – the way he carried his sergeant actively allowed the superior officer to kill more people, and moreover, his being a source of inspiration killed hundreds in the victory. It’s hard to call Desmond peaceful in the end (he even says so himself – he believes the enemy is the Devil and needs to be stopped. He just can’t hold a gun himself). Secondly, what is the source of this arbitration between peace and violence? Why should Desmond’s passions be judged superior? It is ultimately a (largely good) Christian sentiment – but then we are left with a troubling picture. Was it that God led the American troops to victory? In fighting under Desmond’s prayer, did the battle of Hacksaw Ridge as depicted in the film become a holy war? That such a consideration might be lauded is something I find deeply troubling.
I also want to mention the absence of any black soldiers at Okinawa. There were some present, and in my memory absolutely none were shown in the film. That’s another argument, however, for another time.
https://www.nps.gov/parkhistory/online_books/npswapa/extcontent/usmc/pcn-190-003132-00/sec11.htm