Author Archives: adz8

Just When You Thought it Was Safe…

Just When You Thought it Was Safe…

By: Rob Ralyea

Every morning around 7 AM I get the morning Food Safety News delivered to my Inbox. Usually about then, my coffee is done, I’ve piled through some of the more pressing stuff from the night before and I settle in to read the snippets of the goings-on in the Food Safety world. For those who know me, I am all about vomiting (aka puking) and diarrhea and all the things that go with a good foodborne illness (obviously except when I have it, which knock on wood has been pretty rare so far during my tenure on planet Earth). My most recent personal event was a few years ago when my better half got a case of what we’ll call the ‘two-bucket blues’… that’s when you get a foodborne disease that affects both ends of your body at the same time (take a moment and insert your own visual image here). That’s not a trademarked term by the way, so feel free to use it! She was even less impressed when I told her what she had, how it would progress and about how long it would last. I even told her where she probably had acquired the Staphylococcus aureus food poisoning that she was suffering with, which at the time also did not impress her (for some reason). The difference between Staph and Norovirus is somewhat subtle, in that Staph food poisoning will start about 3-4 hours in after you’ve eaten the contaminated food, and Norovirus takes roughly a day. Staph also is a bit shorter lived. Ah, such is the curse of being a food safety professional… let me also insert here that there is no such thing as the ‘intestinal flu’. The ‘flu’, short for influenza is a respiratory disease. While flu’s are in fact caused by viruses, Norovirus is not a cause of influenza. If you have diarrhea and/or vomiting and have been diagnosed with Norovirus, you have foodborne illness (which may have been contracted by merely contacting a surface that was contacted previously by an infected individual), not the ‘flu’.

As I digress back to the beginning, the tale being unfolded in my morning edition of Food Safety News, a disaster of epic proportions occurs. The headline is “Doughnut shop norovirus outbreak victim count nears 250”… NOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooo!!!!!!! Not doughnuts!!!!!!! Yes, now doughnuts. Just when you thought something was ‘safe’, it turns out just as liable to cause foodborne disease as anything else. I mean, come on, doughnuts are fried and are beloved by most everyone around the world in one shape or another. There are the glazed, the jelly filled, the crème filled, the chocolate covered, cinnamon….gee I could go on and on. (Now you want a doughnut don’t you?).   Prior to last year we also thought ice cream was virtually safe. After all, nothing can grow in the freezer, right? Well, we do know that nothing will survive a deep fryer, so this doughnut outbreak is a case of contamination after the fact by a food handler. In fact, I surmise one of the employees was probably returning to work after suffering from Norovirus and was still carrying the virus, thereby causing this outbreak. This highlights the need for plant management to fully understand the risks associated with people returning to work after being ill and how these people need to be managed. A person suffering from Norovirus, for example, can still shed the virus for up to 2 weeks after they’ve recovered and are showing no more symptoms. The virus is also highly transmissible in that it is estimated that it takes less than 100 virus particles to make a person sick.   This little gem (Norovirus) was discovered after it caused its first recognized outbreak in 1968 in Norwalk, Ohio, infecting 150 elementary school children. My last fun fact on Norovirus is that it causes more than half of the foodborne illnesses in the United States.

The real point to the matter is we don’t typically give much sick time to food handlers or food processing employees annually. People who get sick generally either try to work through it, or if they take time off, try to take the minimum time off they possibly can, often coming back to work while still suffering some effects of the disease. In the case of Norovirus, they are in all likelihood still shedding the virus. As food safety professionals we need to be vigilant and place individuals who may have had this type of illness in non-food contact areas. Ideally they wouldn’t return to work for an extended period of time. However, we all know that even when you’re sick, the house payment, the car payment and the electric bill all still show up in the mailbox. Norovirus can live in the wild (outside of a host) for a decent amount of time so having a person in your food facility is also jeopardizing the health of your other employees. Another illustration of how transmissible the virus can be- a person vomited on a New Zealand airliner and a flight attendant cleaned it up (lucky person). During the next 5 days 43% (27 of 63 flight attendants who worked on that plane, including the one who cleaned up the vomit) came down with Norovirus. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21836128).

As food safety professionals, we need to take this disease seriously and maybe start thinking of better ways to manage people who have the disease and work in the food industry. The next time you’re out at a restaurant, I want you to envision the cook in the back, the bartender handling your drink order, or even the waiter/waitress who is bringing out your food, had been out sick for the past few days. Chances are, if that’s the case, you might be missing a few days too…give it a day or two to manifest itself. Then, CALL ME!!!! I’m always looking for new pictures of people with the ‘two-bucket blues’!! It’s my hobby J

In other news, the FDA recently released their Food Safety Plan Builder. If you already have put a Food Safety Plan together, I wouldn’t reinvent the wheel. You might take a look at it though and see if it’s of use to you. It’s located at https://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/FSMA/ucm539791.htm

And as always, the Cornell resources are available online at https://dairyextension.foodscience.cornell.edu/. Here you will find a clearinghouse of information related to Food Safety programs, upcoming workshops, dairy extension contacts and other information that may be of use to you.

 

 

 

Faces of Dairy Foods Extension – Erika K. Ganda

Faces of Dairy Foods Extension – Erika K. Ganda

Post Doctoral Associate

Erika obtained her veterinary degree in Brazil in 2012 and her PhD in Animal Science at Cornell University in 2017. Since the beginning of her veterinary training, she has been interested in dairy cows not only from the clinical point of view, but was also fascinated by the many pieces that compose the dairy industry and their interplay.

During her PhD Erika employed molecular techniques to study the milk microbiome in dairy cows affected with mastitis, and the impact of antimicrobial treatment in mastitis cases caused by gram-negative bacteria. She is currently working on a project that aims to use Next Generation Sequencing to monitor dairy products throughout the processing chain for safety and quality.

Erika is passionate about problem solving, evidence-based decision making, knowledge transfer, and the use of cutting edge technology to generate knowledge and make a distinct impact in the dairy industry.

The Food Processing & Development Laboratory is looking for new companies for our Incubator Program

FPDL is looking for new companies for our Incubator Program

Do you dream of starting up a new dairy company? Would you like to manufacture dairy products and you need assistance identifying a manufacturing partner? Don’t look any further, because we are here to help and we are looking for new partners for our Incubator Program!

Cornell University’s Food Processing & Development Laboratory (FPDL) is a 7,000 square foot facility that can support R&D, small scale food production and scaled-up manufacturing efforts.

Cornell’s FPDL provides education, training and technical assistance for the production of value added food and dairy products throughout New York State.  The FPDL serves as a statewide center for food and dairy processing education and training, product development and cutting-edge food processing research. It is a key resource supporting the long-term sustainability of value-added agricultural businesses (and their suppliers) across New York State. Our goal is to help promote and grow dairy processing opportunities in New York State and to provide opportunities for agricultural producers to develop and market value-added products. The successful establishment and expansion of local, value added products also encourages the creation and expansion of other local business (farmer’s markets, restaurants, agri-tourism, marketing, etc.).

To facilitate dairy start-up companies and promote growth in the dairy industry, we have developed our dairy processing incubator program.  To qualify, you must be in NY State and be a small dairy business or be aspiring to start a business in dairy processing in NY.  This is not an open-ended proposition, as you must sign agreements with Cornell University indicating your desire to start and grow a dairy processing-type business.  You must have an approved business plan in place within 3 months of starting and must be planning to move out of our facility into your own facility within 12-18 months. You also provide the labor (although we do have Food Science students/interns that are available on certain days that we use to assist in production), and for set fees, we provide equipment to use.  We will help with small product development projects provided you already have the concept.  If you want us to do full blown product development, fees increase accordingly.

Our Incubator Program has been running now for more than 4 years and has supported several companies, is currently are working with Tumino Cheese Company.

“Tumino Cheese Company, LLC was founded as a business in November 2015 but the roots of the company go back much further. The three partners involved in the company have strong ties to farming and an abiding love of dairy cows and tasty cheese.  In December 2015, Elisa Tumino-Van Amburgh, Sue Prokop, and Mariann Fessenden made their first cheeses using the Cornell University FPDL. Tumino Cheese Company came to the facility with the intent of developing recipes to recreate several Northern Italian, Alpine Style cheeses, and mostly cheeses that are not commonly found in the U.S. market.    Since joining, they have been developing and enhancing recipes and aging techniques to recreate the characteristics of those cheeses including the aging capacity necessary for full development.   Over the last year, they have produced several cheeses that are now being marketed and while doing so have made use of the connections for market access that the Cornell program provides. In addition, the company is continuing to develop their food safety and HAACP plans as they consider their move to their own facility once the program has concluded“ Elisa Van Amburgh

Their logo says it all: “Born in Italy and made in Finger Lakes”.

L-R: Sue Prokop, Elisa van Amburgh and Mariann Fessenden (Tumino Cheese Company)

Working with TCC for the last 18 months, I have seen them growing, learning and developing their business from the idea of producing traditional Italian cheeses to a successful cheese company who is providing delicious high quality cheeses for the New York market.

Now it’s time to search for new companies who want to take advantage of our Incubator Program.

We also provide contract manufacturing support to start-up companies as well as established manufacturers developing new and innovative products.  Examples of product development and research projects supported by the FPDL include dairy-based puddings, drinkable yogurts, fermented dairy beverages, flavored egg nog and other dairy related products.  Because of our smaller scale equipment, our facility is ideal for manufacturing test runs of new formulations or producing consumer or shelf life testing type products on a relatively small scale, yet still mimic real production.

If you are interested in any of these programs, or would like more information on the facility, please contact Rob Ralyea at rdr10@cornell.edu or Carmela Beliciu at clb352@cornell.edu.

Visit the FPDL website here.

 

When Milk Goes Bad

When Milk Goes Bad

By: Rachel Evanowski and Nicole Martin

When milk goes bad, sometimes it goes very, very bad. Such was the case when a US fluid milk processor received a consumer complaint about one of their products turning gray. That’s certainly not a call you want to get before your morning cup of joe. Thankfully the processor reached out to the Milk Quality Improvement Program for assistance in determining what was causing this unique product spoilage. Microbiological analysis revealed that the product was contaminated with a pigment producing Pseudomonas (Pseudomonas azotoformans). Pseudomonas is known to cause a number of color defects in dairy products, including an incident when fresh mozzarella made in Germany turned blue due to a contamination with Pseudomonas fluorescens and caused international headlines (http://www.bbc.com/news/10359001). While these bacteria do not cause illness, color defects are readily detected and detested by consumers, who may assume the product has been adulterated with chemicals.

Due to the heat sensitive nature of Pseudomonas, their presence in processed dairy products is an indicator of post-processing contamination (PPC). In fluid milk this contamination is commonly associated with ineffective cleaning and sanitation practices, inadequate preventative maintenance programs and cross-contamination. Resolving PPC issues may sometimes prove challenging and in these cases source tracking methods, for example, pulsed field gel electrophoresis, that have been used for decades in foodborne disease outbreak tracking may provide a useful tool for dairy processors to find and resolve PPC. The Milk Quality Improvement Program offers a variety of services to assist dairy processors with tracking and eliminating PPC.

For more information on defects caused by Pseudomonas see the following publications:

SQF Updates

SQF Updates

By: Kim Bukowski

The Safe Quality Food Institute’s (SQFI) SQF Code has been updated and redesigned in 2017 for use by all sectors of the food industry from primary production to storage and distribution and now includes a food safety code for retailers. It replaces the SQF Code, Edition 7. Plants will be audited against the Edition 8 Code starting on Jan. 2, 2018.

In August, Cornell will be offering the Accredited Basic HACCP Training, Implementing SQF Systems course and for the first time a SQF Quality Systems for Manufacturing Course.

Accredited Basic HACCP Training Course on August 24-25, 2017 is a 2-day course for individuals who have responsibility for building, maintaining, and updating plant HACCP programs that will meet customer and third party requirements. ​ This course is accredited under the International HACCP Alliance and is designed to meet the requirements set for SQF.

Implementing SQF Systems Course on August 28-29, 2017 is a 2-day course that will give participants an understanding of the Version 8 SQF Code: how to implement these requirements in a food processing plant, as well as food ingredient and food packaging plants to achieve or maintain SQF Certification. It is strongly recommended that students have completed a HACCP Course of at least 16 hours prior to taking this course.

SQF Quality Systems for Manufacturing, August 30-31, 2017 is a 2-day course that provides participants with the basics to become a SQF practitioner for the Food Quality Code for Manufacturing. Attendees will gain a thorough understanding of SQF quality concepts, principles, and application requirements, enabling the implementation of an effective Food Quality Management Program meeting SQF requirements.

If you already have your HACCP certificate and are already a SQF practitioner it would be a great opportunity to learn about the “new” Quality Code and its implementation. We are offering discounted rates if you take more than one course at a time.

Note: HACCP Training should be renewed at a minimum every 5 years.

See full course calendar here.

Dairy Foods Certificate Program- What is it and Why is it Important?

Dairy Foods Certificate Program- What is it and Why is it Important?

By: Anika Zuber

What it is:

Figure 1.

The Dairy Foods Certificate Program is designed to deliver robust knowledge to all participants. Whether it be a business owner or a line operator, sales associate or marketing employee, completing the dairy foods certificate program gives the baseline knowledge necessary for producing and delivering high quality, safe and wholesome dairy products in New York State and beyond.

The program works towards developing a skilled workforce by requiring participants to attend 3 Core Courses, followed by a specialized track that is geared towards the interests or business needs of an individual. The 3 core courses include: 1. Dairy Science and Sanitation 2. Pasteurization (HTST or Vat) 3. Food Safety (HACCP or FSMA PCQI). Upon earning a certificate of achievement for each core course, a specialized course (see Figure 1 for specialized courses) will be necessary to earn a Basic Dairy Foods Certificate in a specialized field.

If the participant would like to earn an Advanced Dairy Foods Certificate, they must have a minimum of 3 years work experience, take the accompanying advanced specialized course and pass an oral examination to become an Advanced Dairy Foods Extension Certificate holder.

Why is the Dairy Foods Certificate Program Important?

On-the-job training is crucial to the success of any employee. However, often times employees are not trained on the reasons why they do the things that they do, or the reasons why their specific job and job duties are important for food safety, food quality or regulatory compliance.

Figure 2. Evelyn Hadley-Rockhill, QA Manager of North Country Dairy with her Advanced Yogurt and Fermented Dairy Products Certificate

Our core and specialized courses are designed to give employees the background knowledge necessary for more complete understanding. This is important and could contribute to improved on-the-job performance, employee retention, satisfaction and overall dedication to their role in the dairy foods system. Participants in the Dairy Foods Certificate Program are often enthusiastic about bringing the knowledge they gained back to their facilities to share with their coworkers or supervisees.

To learn more about the dairy foods certificate program, click here or contact Louise Felker, lmf226@cornell.edu.

Faces of Dairy Foods Extension- Sam Reichler

Faces of Dairy Foods Extension

Spotlight

Sam Reichler

Sam Reichler is a second year PhD student in the Milk Quality Improvement Program laboratory at Cornell. Sam began working in the lab in 2013, when he was an undergraduate earning his B.S. in food science. His past projects have focused on the growth of spore forming bacteria in fluid milk at refrigeration temperatures and on the spoilage of yogurt by yeast and mold. Sam is currently working with New York State dairy plants to detect and characterize the Gram negative bacteria in their milk responsible for post-pasteurization contamination and subsequent spoilage. His project’s goal is to implement corrective actions at the plant level, including novel cleaning and sanitation chemistry and modified worker behavior, that will improve the quality and shelf-life of fluid milk by reducing the instance of post-pasteurization contamination.

 

Cornell University is back at the National Collegiate Dairy Products Evaluation Competition!

Cornell University is back at the National Collegiate Dairy Products Evaluation Competition!

By: Carmela Beliciu

After decades on hiatus, the Cornell Dairy Products Sensory Evaluation (DPSE) Team is back in the game at the National Collegiate Dairy Products Evaluation Competition.  Cornell University was one of fourteen colleges and universities from the United States and France   present at the 95th Collegiate Dairy Products Evaluation Competition (CDPEC) held on April 12th at The Alliant Energy Center in Madison, WI.

Established in 1916 by several universities, the Collegiate Dairy Product Evaluation Contest initially was designed to identify quality defects in dairy products throughout the country so they could be corrected. It expanded over the years to recognize those students and dairy product judging teams that had mastered the ability to identify high-quality dairy products. The contest gives students the opportunity to showcase their evaluation skills and prepare for careers in the dairy industry.

Students tested their palates against professional judges in six different dairy products; fluid milk, butter, yogurt, cheddar cheese, ice cream and cottage cheese. To begin, judges reviewed eight representative samples of the six different dairy products and rendered judgments on each of dozens of possible attributes and the severity of their departure from the ideal. Students were then challenged to present scorecards with answers that were compared to the judgments of the experts.

“Our dairy journey begun that day when we were able to try fried cheese curds, which are famous in the area. The competition was very similar to the Regional Dairy Products Evaluation Competition. However, this time we were more prepared and new exactly what to expect. As a team we placed 10th, which reflects the time and dedication of the students and all the people who helped us during the training.”   Ana Chang

The National CDPEC was a great opportunity for the students to showcase their dairy products evaluation skills and compete with other Universities as: U. of Tennessee (the team winner for all dairy products categories), South Dakota State, Iowa State, U. of Wisconsin, U of Minnesota, U. of Missouri, Clemson and Michigan State University. The competition was intense, and amounted to 5 hours of exhaustive dairy product evaluation!

“It was a great experience to meet other students who had a similar passion for dairy, and sensory evaluation, as well as speaking to them about the food science programs at schools across the country. Being exposed to a wide variety of coaches and judges showed us that there is a subjective aspect to the sensory evaluation of these products, and highlighted which of the negative quality aspects were deemed more important or universal to each segment of the competition.” Brendon Horigan

The Cornell University DPSE Team was represented by: Thomas Reis (BS-19), Elizabeth Brown (BS-19), Brendon Horigan (BS-17), Ana Chang (MS-17) and Sofia Lara (MS-18) and the Team Coach Carmela Beliciu.

L-R:  Sofia Lara, Carmela Beliciu, Ana Chang, Thomas Reis, Elizabeth Brown and Brendon Horigan.

“It was very exciting to represent Cornell University, since it was the first time we were participating after many years of absence in the contest. We achieved great results individually and as a team, which was very satisfactory given our limited experience. Besides the judging experience, the organizers promoted interaction between all the participants and it was interesting to meet and share experiences with students from other universities. Additionally, the Cheese Conference was a great opportunity to do networking with professionals from many different industries related to cheese processing and to explore new trends, technologies and ingredients.” Sofia Lara

The students’ training and dedication paid off, leading to wonderful results at the National Collegiate Dairy Products Evaluation Competition (the first participation for a Cornell team since the ‘80s):

  1. Ana Chang- 2nd place in the Milk category for Graduate Students
  2. Ana Chang  – 3rd place in the Butter category for Graduate Students
  3. Thomas Reis – 3rd place in the Milk category and overall 15th rank out of 40 Undergraduate students.

Overall Cornell DPSE Team’s standing for all Dairy Products was 10th place (out of 14 participating teams).

This may be just the beginning of a great Cornell tradition at the National Competition!

“Coming into Cornell, I knew I wanted to study food science, but with the field being so large, I still hadn’t decided what specific sector I wanted to go into. After practicing for and competing in the contests, I know I definitely want to go into the sensory science behind food. My contest experience definitely opened up my eyes as to how interesting, fun, and important sensory evaluation is”. Thomas Reis

These results would not be possible without participation of a number of dairy experts who through their their time and efforts helped educate our students in the secrets of dairy products evaluation: Carl Teravainen (O-AT-KA), Craig Gile (Cabot), Esperanza Wingard (HP Hood), Steve Murphy, Kim Bukowski, Carl Moody and Rob Ralyea.

The Team would like to gratefully acknowledge and thank those who have financially supported this program to date:

 

  • Great Lakes Cheese
  • New York State Cheese Manufacturer’s Association
  • The 1,200 farm families of Agrimark/Cabot/McCadam
  • Northeast Dairy Foods Association Boosters
  • Northeast Dairy Foods Association Board of Directors

 

“Before this semester, I would have never imagined that there was a Collegiate Dairy Evaluation Contest. Not many students get the chance to try something so interesting and unique, and I was so happy to be a part of it.” Elizabeth Brown

We are always looking for volunteers who are experts in dairy product sensory evaluation for our training sessions.  Since this program is currently funded by the industry, any donations to support the program going forward are also deeply appreciated.  It is our goal to put Cornell University back on the map in dairy sensory evaluation.  Feel free to contact Rob Ralyea at rdr10@cornell.edu or Carmela Beliciu at clb352@cornell.edu – we’d love to hear from you and talk about this exciting program!

Dairy Shrink and Loss Workshop

By: Carl Moody

The” brand new” Dairy Shrink and Loss Workshop is being offered June 20-21st by Cornell Dairy Foods Extension in collaboration with Mérieux NutriSciences.  This workshop is designed specifically for dairy processing personnel who can prevent waste and have a direct and immediate impact on their company’s bottom line.

Participants will learn the fundamentals of product loss as it pertains to dairy processing equipment, maintenance, sampling, testing, calibrations and weight control. The workshop will focus on how proper sampling and testing, equipment maintenance, calibrations, and weight control can decrease instances of shrink and loss. Participants will be able to identify shrink hot spots and help determine strategies to manage the issues discussed. Also included is a thorough explanation of losses and will give tools to prevent future losses in the facility. Other aspects which will be covered in the training are an overview of federal milk market orders, using tools to optimize formulation based on ingredient costs, and an understanding of how to bench-mark their facility losses vs an industry/process standard.

 The program will be beneficial to all personnel, but targeted specifically to production, QA/QC, and maintenance, but financial management positions will benefit as well from the content. The enhanced management of raw materials, formulation, process, maintenance and monitoring of waste streams can improve the overall financial performance of a facility as well as increased sustainability.

We encourage you to register for this course quickly as significant interest is expected. Registration is limited to 40 participants.

https://dairyextension.foodscience.cornell.edu/content/merieux-nutrisciencescornell-university-dairy-shrink-and-loss-june-20-21-2017

Big vs. Small Companies on Food Safety Planning- Does it Matter?

By: Rob Ralyea

I meet many people throughout the course of a year in my travels.  I think one of my favorite lines is, “but we’re a small company, so why do we have to comply with the regulations that the big companies do?”  Or along the same lines, “we’re small so we don’t have the ability, the time or the assets to make those things happen like the big companies do.”   People who tell me this should understand that I feel their pain as I too am responsible for a licensed dairy plant and have to teach students, support research projects, work with companies on product development, support extension workshops and get production done as well- all with 3 employees (1 is part time).

I digress.  I’d like to start by outlining a foodborne disease outbreak that occurred in 2011.  Many of you who follow this sort of thing will probably remember the Jensen brothers and the Listeria outbreak that killed 33 and sickened over 100 more in 28 states.  Brothers Ryan and Eric Jensen inherited a 160-acre farm from their father and they expanded it out to about 6,000 acres, growing cantaloupes, hay and grains.  Note from me, the author… 6,000 acres is by no means LARGE in Colorado or the world of produce growers.

The brothers had years of experience growing and harvesting cantaloupes, but the year before the outbreak occurred they decided to make a few equipment/processing changes, and in the end it would cost them everything (although a small cost as dozens lost their lives and many still have long-term consequences of having been sickened).

Investigators descended on Jensen Farms and would determine that the outbreak occurred because a pair of brothers who had inherited the fourth-generation farm had changed their packing procedures, substituted in some new equipment and removed an antimicrobial wash.   The findings would show that they had poor facility and equipment design as well as poor post-harvest handling practices.

The tragic ending: as you can imagine, the litigation followed.  Unfortunately, there are attorneys in this country who are making a fantastic living by focusing exclusively in foodborne disease outbreak lawsuits.  Marler and Clark, probably the most famous of them, sued on behalf of the victims.  Needless to say, the Jensen’s filed bankruptcy (they were also fined $150,000 each, 100 hours of community service, six months of in-home detention and 5 years’ probation).  A claims administrator in the farm bankruptcy put a value of about $45 million on 61 of 66 claims. It is estimated all 66 will bring a claim value of over $50 million.  Added to the lawsuit (because the Jensens lost everything) were stores selling the cantaloupe. These include Walmart and Kroger as well as the third party auditor, Primus, who had recently audited the farm and gave them a score of 96%.

Why no jail time??  Eric and Ryan Jensen were never out to make anyone sick or kill anybody.  They had no ill will and were trying to do the right things.  Even with the best intentions, things can go wrong, especially when you’re that ‘little guy’ trying to do everything yourself.  The Jensens were cooperative and tried to help in solving the problem.  They are no more evil than anyone else out here in the world and they were trying to make a good and safe product.  A small change can make a big difference in extremely negative ways, as was illustrated in this outbreak.

I can give more examples of small companies that were trying to do the right thing but still had issues:

Whittier Farms (MA 2007).  Listeria monocytogenes, killed 4.  Closed in 2008, citing inability to afford the safety upgrades that were needed.  Pasteurized milk (post-pasteurization contamination issue the culprit).

Billy Goat Dairy (CO 2010).  Campylobacter and E. coli O157:H7, 2 children hospitalized with HUS, 30 ill total.   On farm raw milk sales.

Bravo Farms Cheese Factory (5 states, 2010).  E. coli O157:H7 15 hospitalizations, 1 child with HUS.  Listeria monocytogenes also found in cheese; no Listeria illnesses reported. Outbreak strain found in cheese linked to Costco “Cheese Road Show;” recall expanded to all company cheeses.

Unknown (UT 2010-2011).  Salmonella newport, 62 ill. As many as 2,100 may have been infected since 2009.  Outbreak from raw milk queso fresco cheese. Unknown source of raw milk being used for illegal distribution of raw milk cheese.

Brunton Dairy (PA 2011).  Yersinia enterocolitica, 16 illnesses. Glass-bottled pasteurized milk and ice cream.

Grassfields Cheese, (13 states, 2015-2016).  E. coli O157:H7, 7 illnesses.  Recall of all cheeses produced between December 2015 and August 2016.

Dr Bob’s Ice Cream (CA 2016). Several recalls of a variety of products for Listeria monocytogenes.  Dr Bob’s is also closed as of this writing, citing ‘business complications’.

The list above, is in no way all-inclusive, but merely a smattering of outbreaks over the past several years that illustrates bad things can happen even to good people. In some cases, the ingredients used in a food product are contaminated.  A more recent case involves bulk milk powder contaminated with Salmonella.  An older case that resulted in criminal prosecution involved peanut paste contaminated with Salmonella.  We could also expand this list to a multitude of food products, or even restaurants for that matter, as an estimated 48 million people a year will get some form of foodborne illness.

Now let’s think about the other part of the postulating argument.  If the ‘big’ companies have all the people they need and are able to comply with regulations, how is it that Blue Bell (ice cream) still has an outbreak where 4 people die and over 8 million gallons of ice cream needs to be recalled?  We can ask the same questions for a multitude of large companies who have recently been caught up in the food recall nightmare… Jeni’s Ice Cream (who since finding Listeria in their plant has spent oodles of money on food safety professionals and clean-up), Kraft, Sara Lee, General Mills, ConAgra, pick your company.

The answer is, it does not matter what size you are. One mistake can put you on the wrong side of the litigation trail.  Unfortunately, in today’s world that little trail turns into a superhighway very quickly.

Here is another example of big vs. small: Big companies may have a staff of lawyers, but causing foodborne disease or death is nearly indefensible. This puts big companies in a similar position to small companies without a staff of lawyers. How can a company of any size defend an outbreak, especially with the advances of science in the field of microbiology and genomics? With the implementation of the Food Safety and Modernization Act, (FSMA) the ability to fly under the radar is even tougher.  Pathogens isolated from plants are now getting sent for whole genome sequencing and are stored in a database.  Guess what happens when an outbreak occurs and the pathogen sequence matches one that is in the database that was once found in your plant?  It makes a very good friend of mine lament to me that he, “would love to figure out a way to quit making food and start making plywood……he would sleep better at night”.  Bill Marler once told me he’d love to be an “ambulance chaser:, that nothing in the world would please him more… and he wished the foodborne disease market for litigation would dry up completely.  Until then, though, he will continue to advocate for those harmed because of the food they ate.