The Bird is being chased in Brian Priestly’s biography of jazz icon Charlie Parker, but the real question is whether Priestly will ever catch up?
Parker with his saxophone. Ray Whitten/Michael Ochs Archives, via Getty Images
Chasin’ the Bird: The Life and Legacy of Charlie Parker by Brian Priestly focuses so purely on the genre-defining music of the jazz legend, that it falls short of its promise to satisfy the morbid curiosity surrounding Parker’s notoriously dark personal life. With Priestly’s background as an established pianist, his dissections of Parker’s music are insightful and musically technical, which would appeal to an audience including people who think like him. Unfortunately, I am not one of those people, and while I found these in-depth descriptions interesting, they seemed to overtake the book and take away from other facets of the Charlie Paker story.
At the core of the book lies Priestley’s profound understanding of jazz, evident in his meticulous dissections of Parker’s music. Drawing on his own experiences as a pianist, Priestley dives deep into the intricacies of Parker’s compositions, providing insights that would undoubtedly resonate with a niche audience – those who share his musical sensibilities. For readers with a penchant for technical musical analysis, these passages offer a treasure trove of information, enriching their understanding of Parker’s innovations and contributions to jazz.
However, for readers less inclined towards the technicalities of music theory, these detailed musical explorations may prove to be overwhelming, overshadowing other aspects of Parker’s life. The promise of a comprehensive exploration of Parker’s personal struggles and triumphs, hinted at by the book’s title, remains somewhat unfulfilled. Priestley’s laser focus on the musical aspects of Parker’s legacy detracts from the opportunity to paint a more nuanced and well-rounded portrait of the man behind the saxophone.
In terms of structure, “Chasin’ the Bird” follows a chronological path through Parker’s life and career. There is much uncertainty regarding Parker’s early life, which Presitly acknowledges: “There are several areas of confusion about the most elementary information concerning Charlie’s background. Partly this is a consequence of the fact that, during his brief career, entertainers generally – and especially the African-American instrumentalists – were not extensively interviewed,” (9). While this approach allows readers to trace the evolution of his music alongside personal developments, there are moments where the narrative feels slightly disjointed. Transitions between musical analysis and biographical elements could have been smoother, enhancing the overall flow of the book.
One of the strengths of the book lies in its ability to contextualize Parker’s music within the broader landscape of jazz history. Priestley skillfully weaves together the cultural and social influences that shaped Parker’s sound, offering readers a glimpse into the vibrant jazz scene of the mid-20th century. The narrative provides valuable insights into the collaborative nature of jazz, highlighting the relationships and rivalries that fueled its evolution. In these moments, the book shines, offering a compelling narrative that goes beyond the notes on the page and delves into the cultural milieu that gave birth to Parker’s revolutionary sound. Priestly draws on a variety of primary sources, and I especially liked the moments where we got to hear Charlie Parker, himself, in clipped quotes: “‘I’d learned to play the first eight bars of Lazy River and I knew the complete tune of Honeysuckle Rose. I didn’t even stop to think about any different kind of keys or nothing like that. So I took my horn out to this joint where a bunch of fellows I had seen around were. And the first thing they started playing was Body and Soul – Long beat, you know? Shit! So I got to playing Honeysuckle Rose – I mean, and awful conglomeration. They laughed me off the bandstand, they laughed at me so hard,’” (16-17). These glimpses into Parker’s thought process through the voice of the man himself humanize him, and Preistly does a good job of utilizing the primary sources that were available to him.
Despite these strengths, there is a sense of missed opportunities throughout the book. The chapters that touch upon Parker’s personal life feel somewhat cursory, leaving readers craving a more in-depth exploration of the man behind the music. Priestley provides glimpses into Parker’s struggles with addiction, his tumultuous relationships, and the impact of his lifestyle on his health, but these aspects often feel like fleeting shadows rather than fully fleshed-out narratives. The result is a somewhat one-dimensional portrayal of Parker, where the brilliance of his music takes center stage, but the complexities of his humanity remain in the shadows.
The prose, while generally engaging, occasionally succumbs to a level of technicality that might alienate readers unfamiliar with musical terminology. Priestley assumes a certain level of musical literacy from his audience, which may limit the accessibility of the book to a broader readership. There are even pages in the book that include the sheet music with an in-depth analysis: “His use of harmony was extremely sophisticated, but what distinguished his mature style was the ability to take any principle of chord complication… and make it work in a totally non-programmed and no-schematic way. Put more succinctly, the polyrhythmic approach was fundamental but the polyharmonies were less so,” (116). As a non-music maker, these sentences were almost completely lost on me. While the depth of musical analysis is undoubtedly a strength, finding a more balanced approach that caters to both the seasoned musician and the casual reader would have enhanced the book’s overall appeal.
In conclusion, Chasin’ the Bird by Brian Priestley serves as a comprehensive exploration of Charlie Parker’s musical legacy, offering valuable insights into the technical brilliance that defined his career. However, the book falls short of delivering on its promise to delve into the intricate details of Parker’s personal life. Priestley’s background as a pianist infuses the narrative with a level of musical expertise that may resonate strongly with certain readers but may prove less engaging for those seeking a more holistic understanding of the jazz icon. While Chasin’ the Bird succeeds in unraveling the musical tapestry of Charlie Parker’s legacy, it leaves behind the shadows of his personal struggles, leaving readers yearning for a more complete portrait of the man behind the saxophone.