by

Finding NSF programs and program officers for your research

tl/dr: Figuring out where to send proposals at NSF can be confusing. Understanding NSF’s org structure and solicitation mechanisms, using NSF’s award search tool (and colleagues) to look for programs and program officers that manage awards related to you work, and effectively working with program officers to find good fits can help you out.

More detail:

Getting started with applying for funding can be pretty confusing, even if you have good mentors, and as both a mentor and now a three-year rotating program officer at the National Science Foundation I’ve answered versions of this question many times. So, I figured it was time to write down some of the things I often say, though as always, these views represent my personal opinion and experience and not those of my NSF overlords. Further, there are many folks with many opinions on the topic, so ask and search around (though I was surprised not to find too many posts about this when I was putting this together).

I’ll organize the post around three main themes/tasks: (1) understanding NSF’s organizational and solicitation structure, (2) finding places in that structure that might fit your work, and (3) investigating those places through contacts with program officers and panel/review service.

First, structure, because it’s helpful to understand the basic mechanisms through which NSF solicits proposals. The root organizational structure is a hierarchy that broadly aligns with a swath of academia’s own organization of fields, with the top level being Directorates: CISE (Computer and Information Science and Engineering), SBE (Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences), ENG (Engineering), EHR (Education and Human Resources) and so on. [1] Directorates contain Divisions; inside of CISE, for instance, are three — CCF (Computing and Communication Foundations), CNS (Computer and Network Systems), and IIS (Intelligent Information Systems) — along with OAC (the Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure). Then inside of Divisions are typically Programs; IIS, for instance, contains RI (Robust Intelligence), III (Information Integration and Informatics), and CHS (Cyber-Human Systems).

Most of the core programs have some kind of core solicitation attached to which you can submit proposals. So, for instance, you wouldn’t submit to CISE or to IIS, you might submit instead to one of the core programs inside of it. This isn’t NSF-wide (in EHR, the EHR Core Research solicitation crosses the whole directorate, for instance), but programs that field solicitations it’s the general structure [2].

There are also cross-cutting solicitations that as the name implies cut across the hierarchical structure, that multiple organizational units at NSF fund and administer together. Some are foundation-wide things like CAREER; some are broad cross-cutting ones like SaTC (Secure and Trustworthy Cyberspace) that multiple directorates participate in; some are cross-cutting but within individual directorates like CRII (CISE Research Initiation Initiative) and CCRI (CISE Community Research Infrastructure) [3]. You’ll also sometimes see a Dear Colleague Letter come out that asks for proposals in a specific topic or area, or that invites supplements to existing awards for a specific purpose [4].

Now that we understand solicitations can come from many places and take several forms (core solicitations, cross-cutting solicitations, and dear colleague letters that contain requests for proposals), the next trick is finding ones that might fit you [5].

To that end, NSF’s award database has a lot of value. Using various keywords that sound like your research [6] will bring back award abstracts that show you what’s being funded (pay attention to the award dates, though — sometimes you will get pretty old awards) as well as the programs and program officers who are managing those awards. Those are places and people that you should be aware of as possible funding targets.

NSF also has tools for searching funding opportunities and finding about about announcements from programs (which often contain information about funding opportunities). For instance, this sample search looking for CISE program announcements will give you a list of communications, including solicitations, FAQs, and Dear Colleague Letters that someone believed were relevant to the CISE community. The volume can be pretty high, but it’s an easy scan/filter task, and finding a relevant opportunity you didn’t know about can be high value. In particular, new opportunities sometimes crop up. Being aware of ones that might fit you can give you a leg up versus people who are not aware of them [7].

I’ve also seen that it’s useful to be aware of executive branch research priorities, often articulated by the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), as well as NSF’s own strategic plans, activities, and announcements [8]. It turns out that many cross-cutting solicitations — often the larger ones in terms of dollars — come out subsequent to OSTP and NSF Director-level initiatives, suggesting that it makes sense to keep an eye out for new solicitations related to those topics [9].

Finally, asking colleagues in your intellectual spaces where they submit can also give you a sense of potentially interesting programs and program officers. Said colleagues will often have useful experience with and advice about interacting with them. More generally, junior folks often think they should figure everything out for themselves, but there’s a ton of value in working with more senior mentors on funding. This ranges from collaborating on proposals, to asking for thoughts on finding opportunities and fit of ideas to them, to getting specific feedback on specific proposal ideas and even drafts. People are busy but also often generous, and getting advice from colleagues and mentors is the number one thing I think junior faculty could do to get better faster at proposal writing.

Okay, now that you’ve identified some potential targets using the methods above, it’s time to dig more deeply into whether they really are fits.  Even if you’ve done the homework to look up official NSF program descriptions and awards made by that program in the past, and even if you ask colleagues, it can be hard to tell how well a particular proposal idea is going to fit a particular program because the official text of a solicitation only gives so much information.

One way to learn more about what a solicitation is about in practice is to search for (recent) awards made under it, assuming it’s not brand new. Many solicitations will have a link near the bottom of the page to help with this; there’s also an advanced search tool that can help you (among other things) find all the proposals funded by a specific solicitation, although you’ll need to find the right Program Element Code to narrow to a particular program/solicitation.

Your most likely source of information, though, is to email/talk with relevant program officers about whether your project ideas fit the programs they work with. They probably have the clearest sense of what a program’s goals are and how a project idea might fit them, often have a high level sense of how panelists might react to some aspect of a project idea, sometimes have deep expertise of their own they can bring to bear [10], and may also know other parts of NSF that could be interesting homes for a project idea [11]. Most program officers are also genuinely interested in mentoring, especially for junior researchers, so you should feel empowered to reach out to them.

It’s helpful to ground conversations with program officers in specific 1-2 page project writeups. Having a writeup in advance helps focus your own thinking and will also make interactions with program officers more efficient and effective [12]. These writeups might not be too different from an expanded project summary of the kind you might submit with a proposal, but focusing more on the specific questions, contributions, activities, and evaluations you’re considering, and less on generic “why it’s important” text. Thinking about Heilmeier’s Catechism for proposing research can be helpful here [13].

Once you have a passable version of that (it doesn’t have to be perfect), email it to the most relevant program officer you can think of in the most relevant program or two, based on the homework you’ve already done as described above. Note that solicitations often list multiple program officers, and different folks usually handle different subtopics/panels within a given solicitation.  So, best if you can identify one who handles awards related to your idea (whether in this solicitation or in general) and mail them. If you can’t tell who is best, the first person listed is often a “lead” for the solicitation and it’s reasonable to mail them and ask them who to ask. Don’t email all of them, especially individually; that’s wasteful and inconsiderate of time.

You might ask them about their thoughts on fit to their own program(s) and other programs or program officers they might recommend, as well as any thoughts they have on the proposal itself or on framing it for panelists in their program. If you’re new enough to a program or to NSF that you don’t have a good feel for it, it might make sense to ask if you could have a talk where you ask more general questions as well as talk about the writeup.

Program officers will have different levels of responsiveness to these questions. Some are more willing to talk general program or NSF issues than others. Some try hard not to inject their own opinions on proposal content both to increase fairness (relative to other PIs not getting feedback) and in case their opinions are wrong. Some prefer to reduce their contact with PIs during the proposal process in general, with the goal of avoiding biases induced by having such contact, and may want to interact by email versus calls or in-person visits.

But, you should at least get a response about program fit, and my general sense is that NSF program officers are pretty generous in interacting with PIs. If you’ve been waiting more than a week [14], it’s legitimate to re-send the mail, or try a different program officer associated with the program. Don’t take it personally, or give up on the idea of contacting POs [15].

Another way to get a sense of a program, and connect to its program officers and reviewing community, is to serve as a panelist. I’ve written a separate blog post about that so I won’t say much here, except that serving is a great way to learn a lot about proposal writing and evaluation while both serving and representing your intellectual communities while meeting both folks in those communities and program officers.

And I think that’s my story on this.  Hopefully this was useful for thinking about how to find places and people at NSF that might be good fits for you, and remember to look around for other thoughts on these topics.  A few that I bumped into while I was writing this are included below for your initial bonus amusement.

#30#

[1] There are also various administrative Offices at this level, but these don’t usually field many programs or solicitations, so I ignore them for simplicity.

[2] One of the things I’ve learned coming here as a rotating program officer is that NSF is less monolithic than you’d think. The high level structure of proposals, panels, etc., is mostly the same, and we have high level policy guidance, but practices can be quite different at every level from directorates to individual program officers.

[3] Yes, it’s awkward that the acronyms are close. There are a lot of acronyms here.

[4] DCLs vary widely; here a couple of (expired) examples I’ve been involved with, one that solicited interdisciplinary SaTC proposals, and one that looked to advance citizen science research.

[5] For what it’s worth, I was not very good at this as a PI; I just submitted to CHS’s predecessor (Human-Centered Computing) a lot, although I had collaborators who were better at this game and wound up with some collaborative submissions to other solicitations. More generally, you should also look beyond NSF to other agencies, foundations, and industry; I wasn’t particularly good at that either so I won’t discuss that here.

[6] Or, names of PIs in your community who do the kind of research you do. Finding out where they get NSF funding could be pretty useful, and PIs are sometimes willing to share proposals, which can be super-helpful for understanding the genre of proposal writing [6′].

[6′] As can reviewing, which is good for both you and the community. See my post on how to become a reviewer for more.

[7] Another interesting aspect about new solicitations is that NSF solicitations in general have a bottom-up component. There’s also definitely a top-down strategic leadership idea behind them that the solicitation descriptions work to capture, but the proposals submitted and the panelists who review them help define them in practice. New solicitations may have a little more wiggle room in this sense because they don’t have this historical “in practice” momentum.

[8] Being involved in visioning workshops funded by NSF, the Computing Community Consortium (CCC), and other places that generate whitepapers, workshop reports, etc., about the state and future of a field or topic can be a way to have your own strategic impact along these lines.

[9] I wouldn’t spend space in your proposal, however, talking about how it aligns with some NSF goal or solicitation, and I especially wouldn’t quote solicitations. Whenever I see this, I think about how that space could be used to instead give compelling details about the project that could help convince panelists that the proposal is strong.

[10] Note that program officers often cover a broad range of topics, so although they will generally have a sense of the areas where they manage proposals, they will often not have personal deep research experience with specific topics. Two corollaries of that are (1) POs will be good at giving feedback about fit, but less well-positioned on average to give feedback about content, and (2) you should ask colleagues in the area for feedback on the content as you’re preparing proposals. Better to find out about something you missed before the panel than after.

[11] But, just as NSF program officers don’t know everything about every topic they manage proposals on, they also won’t know everything about the rest of NSF. It’s not so unlike being asked if you know a particular faculty member at your own institution. If they’re not close to your own department or research interests, probably not, unless you’re fairly senior or fairly outgoing/engaged and interact with other folks outside of the context of your own research.

[12] Sending a writeup in advance trades time explaining an idea on the phone for time discussing/getting feedback on ideas. Program officers aren’t infinitely busy, but they’re busy, and these explanations sometimes sound more like sales pitches, which are not very helpful. If the fit with a particular PO is not good, the writeup can help them suggest more appropriate folks to contact right away without you having to waste time waiting for an ultimately unproductive chat. If the fit is reasonable, seeing the writeup in advance lets them have more considered reactions than hearing it explained and reacting on the spot. Some program officers are also more comfortable and responsive responding in email than on the phone.

[13] At least in CHS and SaTC, two solicitations I’ve done a lot of work with, proposals often focus too much on an applied problem they’re looking to solve, or talk about general hoped-for impacts from the work, rather than the underlying research questions, contributions beyond existing knowledge, and specific impacts the project might achieve. Proposals that don’t make the research contributions clear are both usually dead in the water for panelists and very hard to reason about program fit for.

[14] Like academic life in general, program officer schedules can be bursty and time-bound. In addition to panels, which consume the better part of 5 days to organize and run and which some program officers organize a couple dozen of a year, POs travel to conferences, do internal and external service, and have other deadlines and responsibilities. A corollary of this is that it’s a good idea to make inquiries well in advance of submission deadlines.

[15] I had a pretty bad first couple of attempts to contact folks. What I now think happened in my case is that I mailed a program officer whose NSF rotation was ending, and they didn’t respond before they left and lost access to their mail, and the mail dropped on the floor. People also accidentally delete emails (I estimate my personal rate is about 1 of 300), and mail servers sometimes fail (a program officer tried to mail me once as a PI to make an award recommendation very late in the fiscal year, meaning there was little time to put it together, and Cornell’s email system spam filtered it away. Fortunately for me they also called on the phone.)

Write a Comment

Comment

28 Comments

  1. With the vast number of programs and grants offered through the National Science Foundation, it can be confusing where to start. Many NSF programs are designed to support a specific community, while others may have a broader focus. So if you have an idea or project that fits into a particular community or field, you might want to start by searching for that. I write papers and in my confusing situation, I prefer to visit https://writix.co.uk/essay-examples/sociology website where I found the real templates free of cost to make my notes accordingly and insist people.

  2. While there are many sources for information and assistance, including search engines like Google and online services, finding NSF program officers or other staff members that can help you navigate the application process can be difficult. You can visit here https://rubygarage.org/blog/how-to-build-a-b2b-website and learn more helpful ways to build a b2b website. Some contact information may not be active or accessible, such as through university web pages. Here are some tips on how to find a contact at NSF who can help you more easily complete an application for funding for your research project.

  3. I just wanted to express my sincere appreciation for the valuable information you provided in your article “Finding NSF Programs and Program Officers for Your Research.” As a researcher, I know firsthand how challenging it can be to find funding for my work. Your article provided clear, step-by-step guidance on how to find NSF programs and program officers that align with my research interests.

    Your article was well-written and easy to follow, and I feel much more confident in my ability to find funding opportunities through the NSF. Thank you for taking the time to share your expertise and insights with the research community. Your contribution is greatly appreciated.

    https://vanityroofing.ca

  4. Quillbot is a language processing tool that helps bloggers and writers improve the readability and coherence of their writing. With Quillbot Premium, users have access to advanced features and functionality that allow them to fine-tune their writing and create professional-quality content with ease.

    Get Quillbot Premium in Free: https://guiderman.com/quillbot-premium-account-free/

  5. Finding NSF programs and program officers for your research can be a challenging task, but it is essential for securing funding for your project. It is important to research and understand the specific program guidelines and priorities to ensure that your proposal aligns with their mission and goals. Utilizing resources such as the NSF website and reaching out to program officers for guidance can help streamline the process and increase the chances of your proposal being accepted.
    https://secretplaymates.net/chelsea-escorts

  6. Web development is a constantly evolving field that involves the creation, design, and maintenance of websites and web applications. It encompasses a wide range of skills, including coding, graphic design, and user experience design. With the increasing importance of online presence and e-commerce, web development has become a crucial aspect of any business or organization. The field offers a wide range of job opportunities, from front-end developers to full-stack engineers, and is a great choice for those interested in technology and design.

    https://digitalworldgiant.com/web-development-company-new-york/

  7. This article provides a comprehensive guide to finding the right NSF program and program officer for your research. The information on searching for programs and locating program officers is incredibly helpful, especially for those who are new to the NSF funding process. The author’s step-by-step approach and clear explanations make it easy to understand the process and get started. I especially appreciated the advice on how to reach out to program officers and make a strong impression. This article is a valuable resource for any researcher looking to secure NSF funding. Thank you for sharing your expertise and experience! local SEO

  8. A major reason for the HP printer not printing colors correctly is low ink levels. Find out the current ink levels in your printer by going to the print supplies status page. After that, replace the ink cartridges on your printing device. You can also set color options by tapping the ‘Paper/Quality’ tab. Select the color field for it.

  9. Very good article! thank you to the author for it! In its interesting and useful information it is possible often times re-read it! I will advise reading it all friends. It will be very useful for the writing of the article. Very much thank you.
    Quiebras de abogados

  10. When embarking on the journey of finding NSF programs and program officers for your research, harnessing the vernet magic can lead to fruitful outcomes. This captivating allure refers to the art of navigating through the vast landscape of the National Science Foundation (NSF) and tapping into the interconnected web of available resources. The process involves meticulously exploring the NSF’s website, understanding their mission, and aligning your research objectives with the relevant programs. Moreover, employing the vernet magic entails forging meaningful connections with program officers who act as invaluable guides throughout the application process, offering expert insights and advice to shape your proposal into a compelling and competitive endeavor. By harnessing this magical approach, researchers can enhance their chances of securing funding and realizing their scientific aspirations through the NSF’s support.

  11. Finding NSF programs and program officers for your research is a crucial step in securing funding and establishing successful collaborations. Navigating the expansive landscape of National Science Foundation (NSF) opportunities can be daunting, but it is essential for researchers to identify the most suitable programs that align with their innovative ideas and goals. To streamline this process, researchers can utilize the comprehensive resources available on the NSF website, including the search functionality at https://www.ufabetwins.info/ufabetทางเข้า/. This online tool allows scholars to efficiently explore various funding avenues, from foundational science to interdisciplinary initiatives. Moreover, connecting with dedicated program officers who specialize in specific areas can significantly enhance the chances of securing funding, as these experts provide valuable insights, guidance, and support throughout the proposal development and submission stages.

  12. Struggling with assignments in Saudi Arabia? Your academic rescue team is here! 🎓✨ Our Assignment Help in Saudi Arabia offers expert assistance tailored to your needs. Whether it’s essays, presentations, or research papers, we’ve got the expertise to ensure your success. Our dedicated team of professionals understands the challenges students face and is committed to providing top-notch, plagiarism-free solutions. With us by your side, you can wave goodbye to stress and hello to academic excellence. 🌟 Don’t let assignments weigh you down; let us lift you up! Reach out now for affordable and reliable help that guarantees your grades soar. 🚀📝

  13. Many students have problems when they seek Assignment Help because some university students are unsure how to get help with assignment and which company is best for them. Don’t be concerned. Our staff is one of the top assignment help service providers, assisting students with all types of assignments. You can call Home of Dissertations if you want plagiarism-free content delivered on schedule.

  14. Here, the prosecution attorney must establish your guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. However, the emphasis now turns to the accused, and they might avoid major consequences by retaining the services of The Law Offices of SRIS, P.C. ‘s professional dui lawyers in Arlington, Virginia, to represent them.

  15. Navigating NSF programs and identifying program officers is a critical aspect of research success. Seeking assistance from an interview paper writing service is invaluable in gaining insights from experienced researchers. These services can aid in crafting compelling narratives, effectively conveying your research objectives to potential program officers, thus increasing the likelihood of securing the support necessary for your academic endeavors.

  16. The Spanish Group’s official English to Spanish translation document services extend into translation for immigration purposes including USCIS certified translations. We make it easy to get an immigration translation in the exact format required, and with all the proper certifications.

  17. What an incredible post—thank you for sharing such valuable information and keeping us updated. Take a moment to explore the extraordinary Culture Hoodie an absolute necessity for those with a keen eye for style.

  18. I really like the community system in Drift Boss. People are very friendly and willing to share experiences with each other.