arXiv is an important component of scholarly communication among its communities. The readers and authors of arXiv expect to find articles that advance their scientific understanding and pique ideas and discussions, and so arXiv maintains that expectation and trust with assistance from its moderation process. The arXiv moderation process strives to rapidly disseminate research while meeting content and technical standards. Each paper that an author submits is subject to this process, which checks that submissions are relevant to the scientific community and follow arXiv policies.
This year, on average, over 10,000 articles were submitted to one of the 8 scientific categories and their 149 total sub-categories within arXiv each month. This means that every day 600-800 articles are submitted by authors who expect that their article will be posted in the next announcement. We manage this volume with a team of arXiv administrators and volunteer moderators who work together to verify that submissions meet our technical requirements and content policies.
What is our moderation process?
arXiv administrators, consisting of a small team of staff and students, work with 170+ volunteer moderators to review the classification, metadata, and content of all submissions. The team performs checks with software support to confirm that the submission is classified to the appropriate subject category, that it is in compliance with our technical requirements, including formatting and metadata information, and that the content is appropriate, which, generally, describes content that would be refereeable by a conventional journal and in the format of a research article. Our arXiv administrators and volunteer moderators work together to review submissions and resolve any issues to move the submission to announcement.
The arXiv moderation process is not a peer-review process. arXiv staff and moderators do not evaluate the validity of the scientific process and cannot give feedback on the submission.
arXiv administrators and moderators work under the guidance and policies set by the arXiv Scientific Director, with advice from our Scientific Advisory Board and the Subject Advisory Committees. The Chair of the Subject Advisory Committees and Scientific Director help administrators and moderators resolve questions and issues when requested.
Approximately 15% of daily submissions are flagged for additional actions or review. Submissions that were not flagged for review or were resolved before the deadline are posted to the next announcement. Our goal is to resolve issues within 24 hours, but some decisions require more time; thus, the submission is placed on hold until a decision can be reached.
As we balance our goals of rapid distribution with our moderation standards, sometimes content gets posted that maybe should not have been accepted. As arXiv is a permanent repository, these submissions cannot be removed after they are posted. Only in cases where the submitter did not have the legal right to submit content to arXiv do we consider removal.
Who are our moderators?
Moderators are volunteers from around the world who have been successfully selected by the Subject Advisory Committee, based on their expertise in their professional fields and in their subject classifications. Our moderators evaluate submissions based on the content and the policies of arXiv, and work with the arXiv administrative staff. They are each responsible for the submissions to their assigned sub-category, and work, ideally, with at least one other moderator. Although, some categories have only one moderator. Moderators generally spend less than 30 mins each day resolving flagged submissions before the day’s deadline, which is 14:00 Eastern Time.
We depend on our moderators. They keep arXiv relevant and of interest to professional researchers– we could not do it without them! Like many organizations that rely on devoted individuals contributing their time and effort, we could not provide the service the arXiv community expects without their dedicated volunteer service.
Thank you, moderators!
Correction: the original post was clarified to explain that moderators cannot not give feedback on submissions.