Rather than tweetstorm, one post with some reactions to the people recommendation tutorial at #recsys2016 by Ido Guy (Yahoo Research, Israel) and Luiz Pizzato (Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Australia), primarily Luiz’ part.
Not sure people recommendation has to be symmetrical; it would be interesting to ponder use cases where that’s not true (Twitter is the one that comes first to mind).
The point that success often gets measured outside the system is a good one — the example of a dating site being successful when people stop using it because they matched was cute. Victoria Sosik, Steve Ibara, and Lindsay Reynolds thought about that in persuasive systems, and the Suhonen et al. Kassi system in barter and social exchange systems.
Random side thought: wonder about designing not just a dating site but a relationship one, where you might use the site to help continue and develop the relationship long term. Doug Zytko was thinking about this a while ago.
Claim that successful people recommendations are ones that lead to interaction is a little overstated maybe. For instance, one potential benefit of “unsuccessful” recs that don’t lead to interaction is learning more about the space of possible people — what is this social circle or company or population of mates _like_?
Point that unsuccessful people recommendations can have psychological effects was nice, as was the idea that people might be more inclined to be makers or receivers of people recommendations, and that varies by context…
The point that people might become less picky over time if early attempts on dates, jobs, etc. don’t pay off (or more picky if you have much success) was interesting, but is that algorithm-actionable? Or is that more about how far people are willing to go down a list of recommendations?
Fraud concern feels a little overstated, even with the legitimate threats of fudgers, liars, scammers… Reminds me a little of the obligatory preventing collusion section in crowdsourcing papers.
Interesting tutorial for system complexities. Exploring asymmetry in recommendations, particularly in platforms have many nuances. The idea of designing relationship-focused platforms introduces innovation. It is actually my college project and I read a few ideas on the site https://edubirdie.com/examples/death-of-a-salesman/ as my site will be related to this famous play. It is interesting to work on strategies for the projects that really make use and investigate the psychological effects it have on the people.
Dive into the world of people recommendation tutorials, where experts offer personalized advice on finding the perfect frames to suit your style and face shape. Whether you’re into bold, statement-making designs or classic, understated looks, these tutorials cater to all preferences. Explore tips and tricks from influencers and professionals, including exclusive insights from glassesusa, for a flawless eyewear experience.
It is often very difficult to consider the right candidate due to an incorrectly written resume. When writing a resume, it is important to adhere to a specific structure so that the information is clear, organized and easy to understand. Here https://www.gotresumebuilder.com/sample-resume-generator you can create an example for yourself to understand what it should look like
The people recommendation tutorial provided invaluable insights into the intricacies of recommendation systems. The session illuminated key techniques and challenges in personalizing user experiences, akin to navigating the sliding door of wardrobe to find the perfect fit. Such discussions not only enhance our understanding but also pave the way for more effective and user-centric recommendation algorithms in various domains.