Feed on

When Sean Fanning created Napster 10 years ago I was 9 years old. At the time I knew very little about computers and even less about the ramifications that files sharing service would have. All I knew was that I could get music instantly without having to pay anything and that was mighty convenient since it wasn’t like I could work, or drive for that matter. I vaguely remember hearing about Metallica’s  lawsuit against the company but I don’t think I knew why the band was suing the company. Soon after Napster was shut down and I moved on to Kazaa because that’s what my friends were using. Kazaa would eventually infect my computer with viruses that prevented it from functioning at which point I gave up on P2P programs.

Now a decade later, I have a much different perspective of the situation when I look back on it. Fanning should be given his due for creating Napster, it was a fantastic achievement but at the same time it deserved to be shut down. As an avid supporter of the industry, I buy at least 3 albums a week and when I say albums I mean the physical CD. How old school of me. Napster and other peer to peer programs stunt the music industry. Why would someone buy an album when they can just download it for free? That’s the question that record companies were forced to ask themselves when Napster first came into existence.

But this peer to peer outbreak is no longer contained to the music industry. As Wired points out in their article “The Shadow Internet,” video games are also being effected by this problem too. In 2004 “a hacker penetrated the corporate servers at Valve, the game company behind the popular first-person shooter Half-Life. He came away with a beta version of Half-Life 2. Movies are suffering a similar fate; over the summer 20th Century Fox saw their big budget blockbuster X-Men Origins: Wolverine leak over a month before it’s planned release date. Though the studio’s CEO Peter Chernin claimed the leaked version was only a work print, it was later revealed that only a few special effects differed between the two versions. Some claim that this leak may have cost 20th Century close to 30 million dollars in revenue! That’s a staggering number by any standard.
It’s easy to trace this all back to Napster and even easier to blame Sean Fanning, but it’s not Fanning’s fault. Fanning simply created software he thought would benefit the masses, he didn’t comprehend the severity of his crimes. It’s the general public that’s at fault. Even after Napster was shut down by the government they’ve found alternative methods to download their content illegally. In fact now the average person is even more capable of downloading their heart’s desire for free. I’m not claiming to be a moral authority, I’m simply saying it’s something to chew on.

Rated: from 5 votes

12 Responses to “Napster: The 10th Anniversary Edition”

  1. ahf43 says:

    You said that “Fanning simply created software he thought would benefit the masses, he didn’t comprehend the severity of his crimes.” While this was probably true since his site was not the first file sharing site but, to the best of my knowledge, the first of its magnitude and the first to specialize in MP3s, this most definitely is not the case of people today who create file sharing sites. Do you think that people who created Napster-esque sites after seeing the outcome of the Napster case should suffer a worse fate than Fanning and Napster, or do you believe that in these cases, the blame should still fall on the general public to a great degree than the creator?

  2. Wesley Ambrecht says:

    That’s a tough question but I suppose their crimes are worse than Fanning because there was intent from the outset.

  3. bmw070789 says:

    There’s also the issue of the public getting involved. I don’t think any college student would actively think “i am sharing and downloading this music for the intent of hurting the music industry, etc.” They would most likely just think “i am one person getting one song. it won’t affect much.” I wonder where the boiling point is when it becomes a tough issue to discern how important “intent” is.

  4. Wesley Ambrecht says:

    That’s the point. If they were thinking “I’m sharing and downloading this music with the intent of hurting the music industry, etc.” they wouldn’t do it anymore.

  5. p2p sites says:


    How come “napster revolution” actually haven’t done anything
    we still have all those p2p sites ,torrents ..
    so what was so argent to close napster???


  6. The industry thought that by shutting down Napster they would be making a statement. Unfortunately, that statement went unheard by many. Now, instead of targeting the companies like Napster, they tend to go after individuals. So, for example, it’s not uncommon for spies to walk onto college campuses and hack into their network to secure the info they need to file lawsuits.

  7. I have been looking for blogs and forums all around the web to learn more about how to market my band, record music and more and this is by far the best place I have found so far.

    I am learning a great deal here! It’s going to assist me a lot when promoting my band and recording songs.

    Thanks for the great info!

  8. Glad I could help. Feel free to follow me on Twitter! @iamwesley

  9. Free Cams says:

    Very nice post. I just stumbled upon your weblog and wanted to say that I have truly enjoyed surfing around your blog posts. After all I will be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again soon!

  10. Great Informative post You are a very smart person! :)

  11. I discovered your blog web site on google and examine a few of your early posts. Proceed to keep up the excellent operate. I just additional up your RSS feed to my MSN Information Reader. Seeking forward to reading more from you afterward!…

  12. you could have an important blog here! would you prefer to make some invite posts on my blog?

Leave a Reply

Class Blog: Copyright in the Digital Age 09