Before I begin I must explain that I felt the need to put liberal in front of Catholic to dispel the quick assumptions that just because one is devout towards a Christian religion doesn’t mean he/she is from the bible belt or votes Republican or follows religious zealots such as Pat Robertson or believes Christian religions are superior or necessarily wants to ban gay marriage or stem cell research, or even abortion. You are more than welcome to ask what my views are on these topics and I will be more than happy to answer you and explain my logic behind my decision on each of them. I believe if it weren’t for the hard-core conservative Christian right (which the Republican party manipulates) I would not even need to make this statement. But that is not the case.
This past weekend, as many of you know, the Pope made a visit to his home country of Germany where he spoke to a crowd mostly consisting of people in the academia profession. In that speech there was one specific comment that rightfully incited many Muslims. When I read the news articles I sat in front of my laptop in disbelief. I couldn’t believe he said that. I know Benedict is no John Paul II, but I thought his goal was to continue to reach out to other religions, make lasting connections for peace. Even his apology did not directly state his sorrow for making the comment but rather the reaction that followed. The speech the Pope made was an opinionated, convince speech (the term I learned from my oral communications class) not an inform speech. He had no neutrality in his speech and therefore cannot take a neutral position on that quote. Although he cited the quote as taken from an emperor, since it is a convince speech, unless he disagrees with or refutes the quote in his speech, it is one that he supports. On the other hand, it does not help the invalidity of his claim that Mohammed preached violence when, as a reaction to what the Pope said, cloth dummies of the Pope are being burned by Muslims, 4 churches were fire bombed by Muslims, and a nun was killed by Muslims. I AM NOT DEFENDING WHAT THE POPE SAID, BUT THE EVENTS MENTIONED ABOVE DO NOT HELP IN REBUFFING THE STATEMENT FROM THE POPE.
On an aside, I would like to say that the day after the speech was delivered (Sunday) I went to church and the first sentence that came out of the priest’s mouth during the sermon was about what happened. I was pleased to see this problem was not brushed under the rug, and the priest certainly did not support what was said; rather he hoped these wounds could be healed. There are two active Catholic priests at Cornell, both of whom I consider to be progressive and universally understanding about all the differences among people whether that be sexuality, race, or religious preferences. I am happy that these two priests have a more realistic world view and compliment them on what they preach. It would be a problem if they didn’t since they are sharing a building with religious leaders from the 21 other different religions represented at Cornell.